The Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services (ERDs) exist to guide administrators, providers, and patients regarding the Church’s principles for maintaining human dignity while providing ethical patient care. A brief history of the document itself is presented followed by a discussion of selected portions of Part One of the ERDs, which relate directly to the mission of Catholic healthcare and why this is important as the secular culture becomes increasingly hostile to religious beliefs.
BellRobert. 2015. Opinion. Tamesha Means v. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, et al. Michigan District Court Case File No. 1:15-CV-353: 1-24. Filed 6/30/15. Accessed May 8, 2021. https://www.aclu.org/legal-document/tamesha-means-opinion.
GiraudoDenisePaulWernerImadMatini. 2020. Memorandum in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Jesse Hammons v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation, et al. Maryland District Court Case No. 1:20-cv-02088-ELH: 1-30. Filed 9/25/20. Accessed May 8, 2021. https://www.aclu.org/legal-document/hammons-v-umms-motion-dismiss.
6.
JippingThomasSarahPerry. 2021. “The Religious Freedom Restoration Act: History, Status, and Threats.” The Heritage Foundation: Legal Memorandum 284. http://report.heritage.org/lm284.
7.
Jones-NosacekCynthia. 2021. “Conscientious Objection, Not Refusal: The Power of a Word.” The Linacre Quarterly: 1-5. doi:10.1177/00243639211008271.
O’RourkeKevinThomasKopfensteinerRonHamel. 2001. “A Brief History: A Summary of the Development of the Ethical and Religious Directive for Catholic Health Services.” Health Progress(November-December): 18-21.
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). 2018. Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services. 6th ed.Washington, DC: USCCB.
12.
VélezJuan R.2009. “Freedom of Conscience in Ethical Decision Making.” The Linacre Quarterly76(2): 120-132. doi:10.1179/002436309803889232.
