Although Christian ethics and contemporary utilitarian ethics both employ terms such as “love” and “compassion” in their efforts to deal with human suffering, they are in fact polar opposite ethical views. This fact is not at all easy to discern. One key to perceiving the radical opposition between them lies in clarifying their respective concepts of love and suffering and the relation between the two. In Christian personalism, suffering is always understood as the suffering of individual persons, while in utilitarianism, suffering is primarily understood as a quantifiable entity detached from the individuals who experience it. This detachment of suffering from individuals leads to the depersonalizing and commodifying recommendations of utilitarianism. The dignity of persons as understood in Christian anthropology serves as the foundation of Christian ethics and is the only basis on which ethics can avoid commodifying people. The article begins with an explanation of the utilitarian approach to suffering and its concept of love. It then proceeds to express the view of love and suffering that flows from the Christian perspective. The article concludes by exposing the inherently self-defeating structure of utilitarian ethics and offers the hope-filled, if challenging, approach of Christian personalism. Although Christian anthropology and ethics developed within the historical context of Christianity, and in fact could only have developed there, the arguments here are primarily philosophical elucidations of the differences between the two opposing schools of thought discussed, while here and there including occasional theological points.
Summary:
The article examines the difference between Christian ethics and utilitarian ethics, bringing out their stark opposition on the topics of love, suffering and the human person.
BenthamJeremy. [1789] 1939. “An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation.” In The English Philosophers from Bacon to Mill, edited by BurttEdwin A., 791–852. New York: Random House.
ColosiPeter J.2007. “Mother Teresa, John Paul II and Christian Personalism vs. Peter Singer and Utilitarianism: Two Radically Opposed Conceptions of the Nature and Meaning of Family.” In The Family in the New Millennium: World Voices Supporting the “Natural” Clan, edited by LovelessS. A.HolmanT. B., vol. 3, 49–65. Westport, CT: Praeger.
8.
ColosiPeter J. 2008a. “Personhood, the Soul and Non-Conscious Human Beings: Some Critical Reflections on Recent Forms of Argumentation within the Pro-Life Movement.” In Life and Learning XVII, Proceedings of the Seventeenth University Faculty for Life Conference, edited by KoterskiS. J.JosephW., 277–304. Washington, DC: Georgetown University, University Faculty for Life.
9.
ColosiPeter J. 2008b. “The Uniqueness of Persons in the Life and Thought of Karol Wojtyła/Pope John Paul II, with Emphasis on His Indebtedness to Max Scheler.” In Karol Wojtyla’s Philosophical Legacy, edited by BilliasNancy MardasCurryAgnes B.McLeanGeorge F., 61–100. Washington, DC: The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
10.
ColosiPeter J. 2009a. “John Paul II and Christian Personalism vs. Peter Singer and Utilitarianism: Two Radically Opposed Conceptions of the Nature and Meaning of Suffering.” Ethics Education15, no. 1: 20–41.
11.
ColosiPeter J. 2009b. “John Paul II and Max Scheler on the Meaning of Suffering.” Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture12, no. 3: 17–32.
12.
ColosiPeter J.2010. “Christian Personalism vs. Contemporary Utilitarianism: The Cognitive Dimension of Love and its Relation to Moral Decision Making.” In The Love of Truth: All Truth and in Every Thing. Essays in Honor of Josef Seifert on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday, edited by CasanovaCarlos A., 391–406. Santiago, Chile: Ediciones UC.
13.
ColosiPeter J.2017. “A Catholic Anthropology and Medical Ethics.” In Catholic Witness in Health Care: Practicing Medicine in Truth and Love, edited by TravalineJohn M.MitchellLouise A., 31–69. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.
14.
ColosiPeter J.2018. “Discussing the Spiritual Soul in the Classroom.” National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly18, no. 3: 417–26.
15.
ColosiPeter J.2019. “The Importance of Philosophical Arguments for the Reality of the Spiritual Soul in Prolife Work.” In Life and Learning XXIX, Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth University Faculty for Life Conference, edited by KoterskiJoseph W. S. J., 107–21. Bronx, NY: University Faculty for Life, Fordham University.
16.
CrosbyJohn. 1996. The Selfhood of the Human Person. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.
17.
CrosbyJohn. 2004. Personalist Papers. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.
18.
DostoyevskiFyodor. 1980. The Brother Karamazov. Translated by Constance Garnett and edited with introduction by Manuel Komroff. New York: New American Library.
19.
FernándezFrancisco. 1989. In Conversation with God, Vol. 2. London, UK: Scepter.
20.
FranklViktor. 1984. Man’s Search for Meaning. New York: Washington Square Press.
KaganShelly. 1989. The Limits of Morality. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
27.
KantImmanuel. 2012a. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Revised edition. Translated and edited by MaryGregorTimmermannJens and Introduction by KorsgaardChristine M.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
KantImmanuel. 2012b. The Metaphysics of Morals. Immanuel Kant, Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by GregorMary. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
McDonoughRichard. 2009. “The Abuse of the Hypocrisy Charge in Politics.” Public Affairs Quarterly23, no. 4: 296–98.
30.
MillJohn Stuart. [1863] 1987. “Utilitarianism.” In John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham, Utilitarianism and Other Essays, edited by RyanAlan, 272–338. London, UK: Penguin Books.
31.
NeuhausRichard John. 2002. “A Curious Encounter with a Philosopher from Nowhere.” First Things120 (February): 77–82.
32.
PistoriusMartin. 2013. Ghost Boy. Nashville, TN: Nelson Books.
SchelerMax. 1998. Ressentiment. Translated by CoserLewis B.HoldheimWilliam W.. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
35.
SchwarzStephen. 1990. The Moral Question of Abortion. Chicago, IL: Loyola University Press.
36.
SeifertJosef. 1976. Was ist und motiviert eine sittliche Handlung?Salzburg: Universitätsverlag Anton Pustet.
37.
SeifertJosef. 1997. What is Life?Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Rodopi.
38.
SeifertJosef. 2003. “The Right to Life and the Fourfold Root of Human Dignity.” In The Nature and Dignity of the Human Person as the Foundation of the Right to Life, edited by CorreaJuan de Dios VialSgrecciaElio, 194–215. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
39.
SeifertJosef. 2013. “Is the Right to Life or Is Another Right the Most Fundamental Human Right—The ‘Urgrundrecht’? Human Dignity, Moral Obligations, Natural Rights and Positive Law.” Journal of East-West Thought3, no. 4: 11–31. http://www.cpp.edu/∼jet/Documents/JET/Jet9/Seifert11-31.pdf.
40.
SeifertJosef. 2017. The Moral Action: What Is It and How Is It Motivated? Translated by WenischFritz. Gaflei, Liechtenstein: International Academy of Philosophy Press.
41.
SingerPeter. 1981. The Expanding Circle. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
42.
SingerPeter. 1993. Practical Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
43.
SingerPeter. 1995. Rethinking Life and Death: The Collapse of our Traditional Ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
SingerPeter. 1999. “A Response.” In Singer and His Critics, edited by JamiesonDale, 269–335. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
45.
SingerPeter. 2003. “Voluntary Euthanasia: A Utilitarian Perspective.” Bioethics17 (5–6): 526–41.
46.
SingerPeter. 2004. “Outsiders: Our Obligations to Those beyond Our Borders.” In The Ethics of Assistance: Morality and the Distant Needy, edited by ChatterjeeDeen, 11–32. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
47.
SmithWesley J.2003. Forced Exit: The Slippery Slope from Assisted Suicide to Legalized Murder. Dallas, TX: Spence.
48.
SpecterMichael. 1999. “The Dangerous Philosopher.” The New Yorker, September 6, 46–55.
49.
Vatican Council II. The Documents of Vatican II. 1966. All Sixteen Official Texts Promulgated by the Ecumenical Council 1963–1965. Translated from the Latin. New York: America Press.
50.
WojtylaKarol (Pope John Paul II). 1993. Love and Responsibility. Translated by WillettsH. T.San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.
