Two experiments using bisyllabic CVCCVC nonsense words that varied in phonotactic probability and stress placement were conducted to examine the influences of phonotactic and metrical information on spoken word recognition. Experiment 1 examined participants' intuitions about the phonological “goodness” of nonsense words. Experiment 2 examined processing times for the same stimuli in a speeded auditory repetition task. The results of both studies provide further evidence that the phonotactic configuration and stress placement of spoken stimuli have important implications for the representation and processing of spoken words.
AUER, E.T. (1993). Dynamic processing in spoken word recognition: The influence of paradigmatic and syntagmatic states. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
2.
BALOTA, D.A., & CHUMBLEY, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 89–106.
3.
BROWN, R.W., & HILDUM, D. C. (1956). Expectancy and the perception of syllables. Language, 32, 411–419.
4.
CHURCH, K. (1987). Phonological parsing and lexical retrieval. Cognition, 25, 53–69.
5.
CLEMENTS, G.N., & KEYSER, S. J. (1983). CV Phonology: A generative theory of the syllable.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
CUTLER, A. (1990). Exploiting prosodic probabilities in speech segmentation. In G.T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 105–121). Cambridge: MIT Press.
7.
CUTLER, A., & BUTTERFIELD, S. (1992). Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 218–236.
8.
CUTLER, A., & CARTER, D. M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language, 2, 133–142.
9.
CUTLER, A., & NORRIS, D. G. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113–121.
10.
EUKEL, B. (1980). Phonotactic basis for word frequency effects: Implications for lexical distance metrics (Abstract from the Proceedings of the 100th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Los Angeles, CA). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68 (Suppl. 1), S33.
11.
FRISCH, S., BROE, M., & PIERREHUMBERT, J. (1995). The role of similarity in phonotactic constraints. Unpublished Manuscript. Northwestern University. Evanston, IL.
12.
GREENBERG, J.H., & JENKINS, J. J. (1964). Studies in the psychological correlates of the sound system of American English. Word, 20, 157–177.
13.
JUSCZYK, P.W., CUTLER, A., & REDANZ, N. (1993). Preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development, 64, 675–687.
14.
JUSCZYK, P.W., FREDERICI, A.D., WESSELS, J., SVENKERUD, V Y, & JUSCZYK, A. M. (1993). Infants' sensitivity to the sound pattern of native language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 402–420.
15.
JUSCZYK, P.W., LUCE, P.A., & CHARLES-LUCE, J. (1994). Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 630–645.
16.
LEVELT, W.J. M., & WHEELDON, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239–269.
17.
LUCE, P.A., PISONI, D.B., & GOLDINGER, S. D. (1990). Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 105–121). Cambridge: MIT Press.
18.
MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G.T.M. Altman (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 148–172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
McCLELLAND, J., & ELMAN, J. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86.
20.
MESSER, S. (1967). Implicit phonology in children. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 609–613.
21.
MORTON, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165–178.
22.
NORRIS, D. (1994). SHORTLIST: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189–234.
23.
TURK, A.E., JUSCZYK, P.W., & GERKEN, L. (1995). Do English-learning infants use syllable weight to determine stress? Language and Speech, 38, 143–158.
