ABNEY, S.P. (1989). A computational model of human parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18(1), 129–144.
2.
ALTMANN, G.T. M., & STEEDMAN, M.J. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30(3), 191–238.
3.
BARD, E.G., & SHILLCOCK, R.C. (1993). Competitor effects during lexical access: Chasing Zipf's tail. In G. T. M. Altmann & R. C. Shillcock (eds.), Cognitive models of speech processing: The Second Sperlonga meeting (pp. 235–276). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
GRAIN, S., & STEEDMAN, M.J. (1985). On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological parser. In D. Dowty, L. Karttunen, & A. Zwicky (eds.), Natural language parsing: psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives (pp. 320–358). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
5.
FERREIRA, F., & CLIFTON, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348–368.
6.
FRAZIER, L. (1987). Syntactic processing: Evidence from Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, 519–559.
7.
GARROD, S., FREUDENTHAL, D., & BOYLE, E. (1994). The role of different types of anaphor in the on-line resolution of sentences in a discourse. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 39–68.
8.
GIBSON, E., & HICKOK, G. (1993). Sentence processing with empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 147–161.
9.
JOSHI, A.K. (1985). How much context-sensitivity is necessary for characterizing structural descriptions --- Tree adjoining grammars. In D. Dowty, L. Karttunen, & A. Zwicky (eds.), Natural language processing --- theoretical, computational and psychological perspectives (pp. 206–250). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
MARSLEN-WILSON, W.D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71–102.
11.
MARSLEN-WILSON, W.D. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann (Eds.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 148–172). Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
12.
MARSLEN-WILSON, W.D. (1993). Issues of Process and Representation in Lexical Access. In G. T. M. Altmann & R. C. Shillcock (eds.), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: The Second Sperlonga Meeting.Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
MARSLEN-WILSON, W.D., TYLER, L.K., WARREN, P., GRENIER, P., & LEE, C.S. (1992). Prosodic effects in minimal attachment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 45A(1), 73–88.
14.
PICKERING, M., & BARRY, G. (1991). Sentence processing without empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6 (3), 229–259.
15.
PRITCHETT, B.L. (1992). Grammatical competence and parsing performance.Chicago: TheUniversity of Chicago Press.
16.
SPIVEY-KNOWLTON, M., & SEDIVY, J.C. (1995). Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints. Cognition, 55 (3), 227–267.
17.
TRAXLER, M. J., & PICKERING, M. J. (in press). Plausibility and the processing of unbounded dependencies: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language.
18.
TRUESWELL, J.C., TANENHAUS, M.K., & GARNSEY, S.M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of Memory and Language, 33 (3), 285–318.
19.
TRUESWELL, J.C., TANENHAUS, M.K., & KELLO, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19 (3), 528–553.
20.
TYLER, L.K., & MARSLEN-WILSON, W.D. (1977). The on-line effects of semantic context on syntactic processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 16, 683–692.
21.
VAN PETTEN, C., & KUTAS, M. (1987). Ambiguous words in context: An event-related potential analysis of the time course of meaning activation. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 188–208.