BADECKER, W., and CARAMAZZA, A., (1985). On considerations of method and theory governing the use of clinical categories in Neurolinguistics and Cognitive Neuropsychol-ogy: The case against Agrammatism. Cognition, 20, 97–125.
2.
BADECKER, W., and CARAMAZZA, A., (1989). A lexical distinction between inflection and derivation. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 108–116.
3.
BLUMSTEIN, S.E., (1990). Phonological deficits in aphasia: Theoretical perspectives. In A. Caramazza (Ed.), Cognitive Neuropsychology and Neurolinguistics: Advances in Models of Cognitive Function and Impairment (pp. 33–54). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4.
CAPLAN, D., (1991). Agrammatism is a theoretically coherent aphasic category. Brain and Language, 40, 274–281.
5.
CARAMAZZA, W., and BADECKER, W., (1989). Patient classification in neuropsychological research. Brain and Cognition, 10, 256–295.
6.
GOODGLASS, H., and KAPLAN, E., (1972). The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.
7.
GRODZINSKY, Y., (1991). There is an entity called agrammatic aphasia. Brain and Language, 41, 555–564.
8.
McCLOSKEY, M., and CARAMAZZA, A., (1988). Theory and methodology in cognitive neuropsychology: A response to our critics. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 583–623.
9.
MICELI, G., and CARAMAZZA, A., (1988). Dissociation of inflectional and derivational morphology. Brain and Language, 35, 24–65.
10.
PACKARD, J., (1990). A lexical morphology approach to word formation in Mandarin. Yearbook of Morphology, 3, 21–37.
11.
RAPP, B., and CARAMAZZA, A., (1993). On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage: A question of theory. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 113–141.
12.
SAFFRAN, E.M., BERNDT, R.S., and SCHWARTZ, M.F., (1989). The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: Procedure and data. Brain and Language, 37, 440–479.
