Data from a cross-cultural study of conversational behaviour were compared with the phonological inventories of the languages being spoken. There was a highly significant inverse relationship between the number of contrastive vowels and the average volume of native speakers' voices. It seems that different languages are not equally salient perceptually.
ANDERSEN, H., (1988). Center and periphery: Adoption, diffusion and spread. In J. Fisiak (Ed.), Historical Dialectology: Regional and Social (pp. 39–84). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2.
CAMPBELL, G.L., (1991). Compendium of the World's Languages. 2 vols. London: Routledge.
3.
LINDBLOM, B,. (1984). Can the models of evolutionary biology be applied to phonetic problems? In M.P.R. Van den Broecke and A. Cohen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 67–81). Dordrecht: Foris.
4.
LINDBLOM, B., (1986). Phonetic universals in vowel systems. In J.J. Ohala and J.J. Jaeger (Eds.), Experimental Phonology (pp. 13–44). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
5.
LINDBLOM, B., and MADDIESON, I., (1988). Phonetic universals in consonant systems. In L.M. Hyman and C.N. Li (Eds.), Language, Speech and Mind (pp. 62–80). London: Routledge.
6.
MADDIESON, I., (1984). Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
MANUEL, S., (1990). The role of contrast in limiting vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different languages. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 1286–1298.
8.
STEVENS, K.N., (1989). On the quantal nature of speech. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 3–45.
9.
WATSON, O.M., (1970). Proxemic Behaviour: A Cross-Cultural Study. The Hague: Mouton.
