BRITTON, B. K., and BLACK, J. B., (1985). Understanding Expository Text. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
EINSTEIN, G. O., MCDANIEL, M. A., OWEN, P. D., and COTÉ, N. C., (1990). Encoding and recall of texts: The importance of material appropriate processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 566–581.
3.
JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N., (1983). Mental Models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
KINTSCH, W., and VAN DIJK, T. A., (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
5.
KINTSCH, W., WELSCH, D., SCHMALHOFER, F., and ZIMNY, S., (1990). Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 133–159.
6.
McDANIEL, M. A., EINSTEIN, G. O., and LOLLIS, T., (1988). Qualitative and quantitative considerations in encoding difficulty effects. Memory and Cognition, 16, 8–14.
7.
PERRIG, W., and KINTSCH, W., (1985). Propositional and situational representations of text. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 503–518.
8.
SCHMALHOFER, F., and GLAVANOV, D., (1986). Three components of understanding: Verbatim, propositional, and situational representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 279–294.
9.
TAYLOR, H. A., and TVERSKY, B., (1992). Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 261–292.
10.
VAN DIJK, T. A., and KINTSCH, W., (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. San Diego: Academic Press.
11.
WEAVER, C. A., III, and BRYANT, D. S., (in press). Comprehension monitoring: The role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text. Memory and Cognition.
12.
WEAVER, C. A., III, and KINTSCH, W., (1991). Expository Text. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, and P. D. Pearson (Eds.). The Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. 2. (pp. 230–245). White Plains, NY: Longman.
13.
WEAVER, C. A., III, and KINTSCH, W., (1987). Reconstructions in the recall of prose. Text, 7, 165–180.