Ansell, B., and Flowers, C. (1982). Aphasic adults' use of heuristic and structural linguistic cues for analysis. Brain and Language, 16, 61–72.
2.
Badecker, W., and Caramazza, A. (1985). On considerations of method and theory governing the use of clinical categories in neurolinguistics and cognitive neuropsychology: The case against agrammatism. Cognition, 20, 97–125.
3.
Badecker, W., Nathan, P., and Caramazza, A. (1991). Varieties of sentence comprehension deficits: A case study. Cortex, in press.
4.
Berwick, R., and Weinberg, A. (1984). The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Bresnan, J. (ed.) (1982). The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
Caramazza, A. (1984). The logic of neuropsychological research and the problem of patient classification in aphasia. Brain and Language, 21, 9–20.
7.
Caramazza, A., and Badecker, W. (1989). Patient classification in neuropsychological research. Brain and Cognition, 10, 256–295.
8.
Caramazza, A., and Hillis, A. (1989). The disruption of sentence production: A case of selective deficit to positional level processing. Brain and Language, 36, 625–650.
9.
Caramazza, A., and Zurif, E. (1976). Dissociations of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 5, 572–582.
10.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding.Dordrecht: Foris.
11.
Friederici, A. (1982). Syntactic and semantic processes in aphasic deficits: The availability of prepositions. Brain and Language, 15, 249–258.
12.
Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G., and Sag, I. (1985). Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Goodglass, H. (1976). Agrammatism. In H. Whitaker and H. Whitaker (eds.), Studies in Neurolinguistics, Volume 1 (pp. 237–260). New York, NY: Academic Press.
14.
Heilman, K., and Scholes, R. (1976). The nature of comprehension errors in Broca's, Conduction, and Wernicke's aphasics. Cortex, 12, 258–265.
15.
Kolk, H., Van Grunsven, M., and Keyser, A. (1985). On parallelism between production and comprehension in agrammatism. In M.-L. Kean (ed.), Agrammatism (pp. 165–206). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
16.
Martin, R., Wetzel, W., Blossom-Stach, C., and Feher, E. (1989). Syntactic loss versus processing deficit: An assessment of two theories of agrammatism and syntactic comprehension deficits. Cognition, 32, 157–191.
17.
Mccloskey, M., and Caramazza, A. (1988). Theory and methodology: A response to our critics. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 583–623.
18.
Miceli, G., Mazzucchi, A., Menn, L., and Goodglass, H. (1983). Contrasting cases of Italian agrammatic aphasia without comprehension disorder. Brain and Language, 19, 65–97.
19.
Miceli, G., Silveri, M., Romani, C., and Caramazza, A. (1989). Variation in the pattern of omissions and substitutions of grammatical morphemes in the spontaneous speech of socalled agrammatic patients. Brain and Language, 36, 447–492.
20.
Nespoulous, J.-L., Dordain, M., Perron, C., Ska, B., Bub, D., Caplan, D., Mehler, J., and Roch Lecours, A. (1988). Agrammatism in sentence production without comprehension deficits: Reduced availability of syntactic structures and/or of grammatical morphemes? A case study. Brain and Language, 33, 273–295.
21.
Saffran, E., Schwartz, M., and Marin, O. (1980). Evidence from aphasia: Isolating the components of a production model. In B. Butterworth (ed.), Language Production, Volume 1: Speech and Talk (pp. 221–241). New York, NY: Academic Press.
22.
Schwartz, M. (1984). What the classical aphasia categories can't do for us, and why. Brain and Language, 21, 3–8.
23.
Schwartz, M., Saffran, E., and Marin, O. (1980). The word order problem in agrammatism, I: Comprehension. Brain and Language, 10, 249–262.
24.
Zurif, E., Gardner, H., and Brownell, H. (1989). The case against the case against group studies. Brain and Cognition, 10, 237–255.