Balota, D.A., and Chumbley, J.I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340–357.
2.
Carlson, G.N., and Tanenhaus, M.K. (1988). Thematic roles and language comprehension In W. Wilkins (ed.), Thematic Relations (pp. 263–288). New York: Academic Press.
3.
Elman, J.L., and Mcclelland, J.L. (1988). Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 143–165.
4.
Forster, K.I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., and Carter, R. (1987). Masking priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 211–251.
5.
Goldman-Eisler, F. (1958). Speech production and the predictability of words in context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 96–106.
6.
Holmes, V.M., Stowe, L., and Cupples, L. (1989). Lexical expectations in parsing complement-verb sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 668–689.
7.
Lima, S.D., and Inhoff, A.W. (1985). Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word-initial letter sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 272–285.
8.
Mcclelland, J.L. (1987). The case for interactionism in language processing. In M. Coltheart (ed.), Attention and Performance XII (pp. 3–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
Mcclelland, J.L., and Elman, J.L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86.
10.
Mcclelland, J.L., and Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.
11.
Mitchell, D. (1987). Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. In M. Coltheart (ed.), Attention and Performance XII (pp. 601–618). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Morton, J. (1970). A functional model of human memory. In D.A. Norman (ed.), Models of Human Memory (pp. 203–254). New York: Academic Press.
13.
Paap, K.R., Mcdonald, J.E., Schvaneveldt, R.W., and Noel, R.W. (1987). Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical-decision tasks. In M. Coltheart (ed), Attention & Performance XII (pp. 221–244). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Paap, K.R., Newsome, S.L., Mcdonald, J.E., and Schvaneveldt, R.W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word-superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573–594.
15.
Paap, K.R., and Noel, R.W. (in press). Dual route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race. Psychological Research.
16.
Rayner, K., Carlson, M., and Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 358–374.
17.
Schvaneveldt, R.W., and Mcdonald, J.E. (1981). Semantic context and the encoding of words: Evidence for two modes of stimulus analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 673–687.
18.
Seidenberg, M.s., and Mcclelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.
19.
Zwitserlood, P. (1985). Activation of word candidates during spoken-word recognition. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston.
20.
Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition, 32, 25–64.
