Six experiments are reported that assess priming effects on lexical decision (in Serbo-Croatian) when the context is identifiable (unmasked conditions) and when it is unidentifiable due to forward masking (masked conditions). Word acceptance is slowed by a phone-mically similar context that is not masked but hastened by a phonemically similar context that is masked. Word acceptance is hastened by an associatively related context that is not masked; this facilitation is somewhat diminished when the context is masked. Finally, word acceptance is hastened by a grammatically related context that is not masked but is unaffected when the grammatical context is masked. These results can be rationalized in terms of a model of the language processor that maintains the autonomy of prelexical and postlexical levels but permits interaction among prelexical components.
Carello, C., Lukatela, G., and Turvey, M.T. (1988). Rapid naming is affected by association but not by syntax. Memory & Cognition, 16, 187–195.
2.
Colombo, L. (1986). Activation and inhibition with orthographically similar words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 226–234.
3.
Evett, L.J., and Humphreys, G.W. (1981). The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 325–350.
4.
Forster, K.I. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W.E. Cooper and E.C. Walker (eds.), Sentence Processing (pp. 27–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
Forster, K.I. (1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 465–495.
6.
Forster, K.I. (1987). Form-priming with masked primes: The best match hypothesis. In M. Colt-heart (ed.), Attention and Performance, XII (pp. 128–145). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Forster, K.I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., and Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 211–251.
8.
Fowler, C.A., Wolford, G., Slade, R., and Tassinary, L. (1981). Lexical access with and without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 341–362.
9.
Frost, R., Katz, L., and Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 101–115.
10.
Goodman, G.C., McClelland, J.L., and Gibbs, R.W. (1981). The role of syntactic context in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 9, 580–586.
11.
Grossberg, S.A. (1978). A theory of visual coding, memory and development. In E.L.J. Leeuwen-berg and H.F.J.M. Buffart (eds.), Formal Theories of Visual Perception.New York: Wiley.
12.
Gurjanov, M., Lukatela, G., Lukatela, K., Savić, M., and Turvey, M.T. (1985). Grammatical priming of inflected nouns by the gender of possessive adjectives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 692–701.
13.
Gurjanov, M., Lukatela, G., Moskovljević, J., Savić, M., and Turvey, M.T. (1985). Grammatical priming of inflected nouns by inflected adjectives. Cognition, 19, 55–71.
14.
Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 1–66.
15.
Humphreys, G.W., Evett, L.J., Quinlan, P.T., and Besner, D. (1987). Orthographic priming: Qualitative differences between priming from identified and unidentified primes. In M. Colt-heart (ed.), Attention and Performance, XII (pp. 106–125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
Humphreys, G.W., Evett, L.J., and Taylor, D.E. (1982). Automatic phonological priming in visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 10, 576–590.
17.
Lukatela, G., Carello, C., Kostić, A., and Turvey, M.T. (1988). Low-constraint facilitation in lexical decision with single-word contexts. American Journal of Psychology, 101, 15–29.
18.
Lukatela, G., Feldman, L.B., Turvey, M.T., Carello, C., and Katz, L. (1989). Context effects in bi-alphabetical word perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 214–236.
19.
Lukatela, G., Kostić, A., Feldman, L.B., and Turvey, M.T. (1983). Grammatical priming of inflected nouns. Memory & Cognition, 11, 59–63.
20.
Lukatela, G., Kostić, A., Todorovic, D., Carello, C., and Turvey, M.T. (1987). Type and number of grammatical violations and the grammatical congruency effect in lexical decision. Psychological Research, 49, 37–43.
21.
Lukatela, G., Moraca, J., Stojnov, D., Savić, M., Katz, L., and Turvey, M.T. (1982). Grammatical priming effects between pronouns and inflected verb forms. Psychological Research, 44, 297–311.
22.
Lukatela, G., and Turvey, M.T. (1980). Some experiments on the Roman and Cyrillic alphabets of Serbo-Croatian. In J.F. Kavanagh and R.L. Venezky (eds.), Orthography, Reading, and Dyslexia (pp. 227–247). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
23.
Lukatela, G., and Turvey, M.T. (1990). Phonemic similarity effects and prelexical phonology. Memory & Cognition, 18, 128–152.
24.
Lukatela, G., Turvey, M.T., Feldman, L.B., Carello, C., and Katz, L. (1989). Alphabet priming in bi-alphabetical word perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 237–254.
25.
Lukić, V. (1983). Active Written Vocabulary of Pupils at the Elementary School Age (in Serbo-Croatian), Belgrade: Savod za Izdavanje Udzebenika SR Srbije.
26.
Marcel, A.J. (1983a). Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 197–237.
27.
Marcel, A.J. (1983b). Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relation between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 238–300.
28.
McClelland, J.L. (1987). The case for interactionism in language processing. In M. Coltheart (ed.), Attention and Performance, XII (pp. 3–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
McClelland, J.L., and Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 357–407.
30.
Michaels, C.F., and Turvey, M.T. (1979). Central sources of visual masking: Indexing structures supporting seeing at a single, brief glance. Psychological Research, 41, 1–61.
31.
Neely, J.H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254.
32.
Posner, M.I., and Snyder, C.R.R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R.L. Solso (ed.), Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55–85).
33.
Seidenberg, M.S., Waters, G.S., Sanders, M., and Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 12, 315–328.
34.
Stanovich, K.E., and West, R.F. (1983). On priming by a sentence context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 1–36.
35.
Turvey, M.T. (1978). Visual processing and short-term memory. In W.K. Estes (ed.), Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processes. Vol. 5: Human Information Processing (pp. 91–142). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36.
West, R.F., and Stanovich, K.E. (1982). Source of inhibition in experiments on the effect of sentence context on word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 5, 385–399.
37.
West, R.F., and Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Robust effects of syntactic structure on visual word processing. Memory & Cognition, 12, 31–45.
38.
Wright, B., and Garrett, M. (1984). Lexical decision in sentences: Effects of syntactic structure. Memory & Cognition, 12, 31–45.
