This study investigated the structural and temporal relationship between graphemic and phonemic processing by means of a cross-modal priming procedure. Subjects made a forced choice on the identity of the vowel in an auditorily presented syllable. To determine if and when phonemic representations are automatically activated by graphemes, visual letter primes were presented before, during, or after presentation of the syllable. in the indirect priming condition, the relationship (congruent/incongruent) between the letter and the consonant adjacent to the vowel was manipulated, whereas in the direct priming condition that between the letter and the target vowel itself was varied. in two indirect priming experiments faster reaction times were obtained over the entire range of SOAs tested when the prime was congruent with the consonant of the syllable, than when it was not. in a third direct priming experiment SOA-dependent facilitation effects were found with respect to a bimodal baseline-condition when the prime was congruent with the target vowel, and inhibition effects when it was congruent with the competing target vowel. The results support the hypothesis of automatic grapheme-to-phoneme activation before word recognition.
COLTHEART, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (ed.), Strategies of Information Processing (pp. 151–216). New York: Academic Press.
2.
COLTHEART, M. (1980). Reading, phonological recoding and deep dyslexia. In M. Coltheart, K.E. Patterson, and J.C. Marshall (eds.), Deep Dyslexia (pp. 197–226). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
3.
COLTHEART, M., DAVELAAR, E., JONASSON, J.T., and BESNER, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (ed.), Attention and Performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
ELMAN, J.E., and MCCLELLAND, J.L. (1986). Exploiting lawful variability in the speech wave. In J.S. Perkell and D.H. Klatt (eds.), Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes (pp. 360–385). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
ERIKSEN, B.A., and ERIKSEN, C.W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.
6.
FLORES D'ARCAIS, G.B., SCHREUDER, R., and GLAZENBORG, G. (1985). Semantic activation during recognition of referential words. Psychological Research, 37, 39–49.
7.
FROST, R., REPP, B.H., and KATZ, L. (1988). Can speech perception be influenced by simultaneous presentation of print? Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 741–755.
8.
GLASER, M.O., and GLASER, W.R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 875–894.
9.
GLASER, W.R., and DÜNGELHOFF, F-J. (1984) The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 640–654.
10.
GORDON, P.C., and MEYER, D.E. (1984). Perceptual-motor processing of phonetic features in speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 153–178.
11.
HANSON, V.L. (1981). Processing of written and spoken words: Evidence for common coding. Memory & Cognition, 9, 93–100.
12.
HEALY, A.F., and CUTTING, J.E. (1976). Units of speech perception: Phoneme and syllable. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 73–83.
13.
HELL, W. (1987). Aufmerksamkeit und Interferenz. Untersuchungen zur kontextabhängigen Verar-beitung von Ziffern.Weinheim: Deutscher Studienverlag.
14.
HUMPHREYS, G.W., and EVETT, L.J. (1985). Are there independent lexical and non-lexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual-route theory of reading. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 689–740.
15.
KAHNEMAN, D., and CHAJCZYK, D. (1983). Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 497–509.
16.
KIRSNER, K., MILECH, D., and STANDEN, P. (1983). Common and modality-specific processes in the mental lexicon. Memory & Cognition, 11, 621–630.
17.
LAHEIJ, W. (1988). Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory & Cognition, 16, 400–410.
18.
MARCEL, A.J. (1980). Surface dyslexia and beginning reading: A revised hypothesis of the pronunciation of print and its impairments. In M. Coltheart, K.E. Patterson, and J.C. Marshall (eds.), Deep Dyslexia (pp. 227–258). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
19.
MILLER, J. (1985). Discrete and continuous models of divided attention. In M.I. Posner and O.S.M. Marin (eds.), Attention and Performance XI (pp. 513–528). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
NEELY, J.H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254.
21.
NICKERSON, R.S. (1973). Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: Energy summation or preparation enhancement? Psychological Review, 80, 489–509.
22.
PERFETTI, C.A., BELL, L.C. and DELANEY, S.M. (1988). Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 59–70.
23.
POSNER, M.I. (1978). Chronometric Explorations of Mind.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum..
24.
POSNER, M.I., and SNYDER, C.R.R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. Solso (ed.), Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
POULTON, E.C. (1973). Unwanted range effects from using within subjects experimental designs. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 113–121.
26.
RUBINSTEIN, H., LEWIS, S.S., and RUBINSTEIN, M.A. (1971). Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 645–658.
27.
SEIDENBERG, M.S. (1985a). Explanatory adequacy and models of word recognition. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 724–726.
28.
SEIDENBERG, M.S. (1985b). The time course of information activation and utilisation in visual word recognition. In D. Besner, T.G. Waller, and G.E. Mackinnon (eds.), Reading Research (Vol. 5) (pp. 199–249). New York: Academic Press.
29.
SEIDENBERG, M.S. (1985c). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 1–30.
30.
SEIDENBERG, M.S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In M. Coltheart (ed.), Attention and Performance XII (pp. 245–263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31.
SEIDENBERG, M.S., and MCCLELLAND, J.L. (1987). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Unpublished manuscript.
32.
SEIDENBERG, M.S., WATERS, G.S., BARNES, M.A., and TANENHAUS, M.K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383–404.
33.
STROOP, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
34.
TOMIAK, G.R., MULLENNIX, J.W., and SAWUSCH, J.R. (1987). Integral processing of phonemes: Evidence for a phonetic mode of perception. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 81, 755–764.
35.
VAN DER HEIJDEN, A.H.C. (1981). Short-term Visual Information Forgetting.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
36.
VAN ORDEN, G.C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181–198.
37.
VAN ORDEN, G.C., JOHNSTON, J.C., and HALE, B.L. (1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 371–386.
38.
VENEZKY, R.L. (1970). The Structure of English Orthography.The Hague: Mouton.
