Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The present study involving two converging experiments tested the hypothesis that rapid, automatic processing of lexical items in a morphemic orthography (Chinese) is necessary, though not sufficient, for reading comprehension. The subjects consisted of 23 skilled adult comprehenders contrasted with 23 less skilled comprehenders. Experiment 1 was a vocalization latency task with 80 open class Chinese characters selected according to printed frequency (high or low) and orthographic structure (simple or complex). Analyses of variance of the vocalization latencies show significant main effects of reader ability, frequency, and structure and the greater contribution of low frequency, complex characters. Experiment 2 was a lexical decision task with another 40 open class Chinese characters similarly selected and matched with 40 pseudo Chinese characters. Analyses of variance of the lexical decision latencies show significant main effects of reader ability, lexicality, and structure and the greater contribution by pseudo characters. These results uphold the automaticity hypothesis and are generally confirmed by treating the items as random effects. The interaction of the various factors in the two experiments suggests their joint effects on the response or retrieval stage of accessing the Chinese lexicon.

Keywords

automaticity Chinese lexicon reading

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BALOTA, D.A. and CHUMBLEY, J.I. , (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340–357.

CHEN, H.-S. and JUOLA, J.F. , (1982). Dimensions of lexical coding in Chinese and English. Memory and Cognition, 10, 216–224.

CHENG, C.-M. , (1982). Analysis of present-day Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 10, 281–358.

FANG, S.-P. , HORNG, R.-Y. and TZENG, O. , (1986). Consistency effects in the Chinese character and pseudo-character naming tasks. In. H.S.R. Kao and R. Hoosain (Eds.), Linguistics, Psychology, and the Chinese Language (pp. 11–21). Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.

FELDMAN, L.B. and TURVEY, MX , (1983). Word recognition in Serbo-Croatian is phonologically analytic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 288–298.

GLUSHKO, R. , (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674–691.

HAINES, L.P. and LEONG, C.K. , (1983). Coding processes in skilled and less skilled readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 33, 97–105.

HENDERSON, L. , (Ed.), (1984). Orthographies and Reading: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Neuropsychology and linguistics. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

HUNG, D.L. and TZENG, O.J.L. , (1981). Orthographic variation and visual information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 377–414.

10.

HUNG, D.L. , TZENG, O.J.L. , SALZMAN, B. and DREHER, J. , (1984). A critical evaluation of the horse-racing model of skilled reading. In H.S.R. Kao and R. Hoosain (Eds.), Psychological Studies of the Chinese Language (pp. 75–101). Hong Kong: Chinese Language Society of Hong Kong.

11.

JACKSON, M.D. and MCCLELLAND, J.L. , (1979). Processing determinants of reading speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 151–181.

12.

JAMES, C.T. , (1975). The role of semantic information in lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 140, 130–136.

13.

KAVANAGH, J.F. and VENEZKY, R.L. (Eds.), (1980). Orthography, Reading, and Dyslexia. Baltimore: University Park Press.

14.

KROLL, J.F. and MERVES, J.S. , (1986). Lexical access for concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 92–107.

15.

LEONG, C.K. , (1986). What does accessing a morphemic script tell us about reading and reading disorders in an alphabetic script? Annals of Dyslexia, 36, 82–102.

16.

LEONG, C.K. , WONG, S. , WONG, A. and HISCOCK, M. , (1985). Differential cerebral involvement in perceiving Chinese characters — Levels of processing approach. Brain and Language, 26, 131–145.

17.

LUKATELA, G. , SAVIĆ, M. , GLIGORIJEVIĆ, B. , OGNJENOVIĆ, P. and TURVEY, M.T. , (1978). Bialphabetic lexical decision. Language and Speech, 21, 142–165.

18.

MARSHALL, J.C. and NEWCOMBE, F. , (1981). Lexical access: A perspective from pathology. Cognition, 10, 209–214.

19.

MCCUSKER, L.X. , HILLINGER, M.L. and BIAS, R.G. , (1981). Phonological recoding and reading. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 217–245.

20.

PERFETTI, C.A. and HOGABOAM, T. (1975). Relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 461–469.

21.

SEIDENBERG, M.S. , (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 1–30.

22.

STERNBERG, S. , (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.

23.

TURVEY, M.T. , FELDMAN, L.B. and LUKATELA, G. , (1984). The Serbo-Croatian orthography constrains the reader to a phonologically analytic strategy. In L. Henderson (Ed.), Orthographies and Reading: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Neuropsychology, and Linguistics (pp. 81–89). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

24.

TZENG, O J.L. , and WANG, W.S.-Y. , (1983). The first two R's. American Scientist, 71, 238–243.

25.

WANG, W.S.-Y. , (1973). The Chinese language. Scientific American, 228, 50–60.

26.

WANG, W.S.-Y. , (1981). Language structure and optimal orthography. In. O.J.L. Tzeng and H. Singer (Eds.), The Perception of Print: Reading Research in Experimental Psychology (pp. 223–236). Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.

Automatic Processing of Morphemic Orthography By Mature Readers

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References