The influence of speech timing on children's auditory processing of sentences was examined with a question-answering comprehension task. Sentences were presented under two conditions, one employing natural speech and the other speech with an electronically-altered temporal pattern. Three types of sentences in each presentation condition were administered to children enrolled in the first, second and third grades. The sentence types consisted of center-embedded (SS) and right-branching (OS) relative clause sentences and conjoined constructions. The main effects of presentation condition, sentence type, and grade level were each significant, as was the three-way interaction. The results are discussed with regard to the interaction among speech timing, sentence structure, and children's age.
ARDERY, G., (1979). The development of coordinations in child language. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 745–756.
2.
ARDERY, G., (1980). On coordination in child language. Journal of Child Language, 7, 305–320.
3.
BLESSER, B., (1974). Discussion: Perceptual and cognitive strategies. In R.E. Stark (Ed.), Sensory Capabilities of Hearing-Impaired Children (pp. 129–153). Baltimore: University Park Press.
4.
BROEN, P.A., (1972). The Verbal Environment of the Language-Learning Child. ASHA Monographs No. 17. Washington, D.C.: American Speech and Hearing Association.
5.
CAIRNS, H.S. and HSU, J.R., (1978). Who, why, when, and how: A development study. Journal of Child Language, 5, 477–488.
6.
COLLIER, R. and 'T HART, J., (1975). The role of intonation in speech perception. In A. Cohen and S.G. Nooteboom (Eds.), Structure and Process in Speech Perception (pp. 107–121). New York: Springer-Verlag.
7.
CROWDER, R.G., (1978). Language and memory. In J.F. Kavanagh and W. Strange (Eds.), Speech and Language in the Laboratory, School, and Clinic (pp. 331–376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
CRYSTAL, D., (1975). The English Tone of Voice. London: Edward Arnold.
9.
DALE, P.S., (1974). Hesitations in maternal speech. Language and Speech, 17, 174–181.
10.
DARWIN, C.J., (1975). On the dynamic use of prosody in speech perception. In A. Cohen and S.G. Nooteboom (Eds.), Structure and Process in Speech Perception (pp. 178–193). New York: Springer-Verlag.
11.
DAVIDSON, M. and TOPOREK, J., (1981). General univariate and multivariate analysis of variance and covariance, including repeated measures. In W.J. Dixon (Ed.), BMDP Statistical Software, 1981 Edition (pp. 388–412). Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
DE VILLIERS, J., TAGER-FLUSBERG, H., HAKUTA, K. and COHEN, M., (1979). Children's comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8, 449–518.
13.
DOOLING, D.J., (1974). Rhythm and syntax in sentence perception. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 255–264.
14.
ERBER, N.P., (1972). Speech-envelope cues as an acoustic aid to lipreading for profoundly deaf children. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 1224–1227.
15.
FERREIRO, E., OTHENIN-GIRARD, C., CHIPMAN, H. and SINCLAIR, H., (1976). How do children handle relative clauses?Archives of Psychology, 44, 229–266.
16.
FLUCK, M.J., (1978). Comprehension of relative clauses by children aged five to nine years. Language and Speech, 21, 190–201.
17.
FREUND, A., (1975). Word and phrase recognition in speech processing. In D.W. Massaro (Ed.), Understanding Language: An Information Processing Analysis of Speech Perception, Reading, and Psycholinguistics (pp. 357–389). New York: Academic Press.
18.
GARNICA, O.K., (1977). Some prosodic and paralinguistic features of speech to young children. In C.E. Snow and C.A. Ferguson (Eds.), Talking to Children: Language Input and Acquisition (pp. 63–88). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
GEERS, A.E., (1978). Intonation contour and syntactic structure as predictors of apparent segmentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 273–283.
20.
HAMBURGER, H. and CRAIN, S., (1982). Relative acquisition. In S. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language Development, Vol. 1: Syntax and Semantics (pp. 245–274). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
HENDERSON, A.I. and NELMS, S., (1980). Relative salience of intonation fall and pause as cues to the perceptual segmentation of speech in an unfamiliar language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 9, 147–159.
22.
JONES, M.R., (1976). Time, our lost dimension: Toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Review, 83, 323–355.
23.
KLEIMAN, G.M., WINOGRAD, P.N. and HUMPHREY, M.M., (1979). Prosody and children's parsing of sentences. Technical Report No. 123, Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 170 733).
24.
LAHEY, M., (1974). Use of prosody and syntactic markers in children's comprehension of spoken sentences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17, 656–668.
25.
LASHLEY, K.S., (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L.A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior (pp. 112–135). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
26.
LEHISTE, I., (1977). Isochrony reconsidered. Journal of Phonetics, 5, 253–263.
27.
LENNEBERG, E.H., (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
28.
MARTIN, J.G., (1972). Rhythmic (hierarchical) versus serial structure in speech and other behavior. Psychological Review, 79, 487–509.
29.
NOOTEBOOM, S.G., BROKX, J. and DE ROOIJ, J., (1978). Contributions of prosody to speech perception. In W.J.M. Levelt and G.B. Flores D'Arcais (eds.), Studies in the Perception of Language (pp. 75–107). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
30.
NOOTEBOOM, S.G. and COHEN, A., (1975). Anticipation in speech production and its implications for perception. In A. Cohen and S.G. Nooteboom (Eds.), Structure and Process in Speech Perception (pp. 124–142). New York: Springer-Verlag.
31.
O'MALLEY, M.H., KLOKER, D.R. and DARA-ABRAMS, B., (1973). Recovering parentheses from spoken algebraic expressions. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics, AU-21, 217–220.
32.
READ, C. and SCHREIBER, P.A., (1982). Why short subjects are harder to find than long ones. In E. Wanner and L.R. Gleitman (Eds.), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art (pp. 78–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
REICH, S.S., (1980). Significance of pauses for speech perception. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 9, 379–389.
34.
RINGLER, N., (1976). A longitudinal study of mothers' language. In N. Waterson and C. Snow (Eds.), The Development of Communication (pp. 151–158). Chichester, Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.
35.
RISBERG, A., (1974). The importance of prosodic speech elements for the lipreader. Scandinavian Audiology, Suppl. 4, 153–164.
36.
RISBERG, A. and AGELFORS, E., (1978). On the identification of intonation contours by hearing-impaired listeners. Quarterly Progress and Status Report (Stockholm: Speech Transmission Laboratory), 2–3, 51–61.
37.
SACHS, J., BROWN, R. and SALERNO, R., (1976). Adult speech to children. In W. von Raffler-Engel and Y. Lebrun (Eds.), Baby Talk and Infant Speech (pp. 240–245). Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
38.
SARGENT, D., (1980). EDSPEECH. Computer program, National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology.
39.
SCHREIBER, P.A., (1980). On the acquisition of reading fluency. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12, 177–186.
40.
SHELDON, A., (1974). The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 272–281.
41.
SNOW, D. and COOTS, J., (1981). Sentence perception in listening and reading. Los Alamitos, CA.: Southwest Regional Laboratory for Educational Research and Development (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 208 388).
42.
SVENSSON, S.G., (1974). Prosody and Grammar in Speech Perception. Stockholm, Sweden: Monographs from the Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm.
43.
TAVAKOLIAN, S.L., (1981). The conjoined clause analysis of relative clauses. In S.L. Tavakolian (Ed.), Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory (pp. 167–187). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44.
TYLER, L.K. and MARSLEN-WILSON, W., (1981). Children's processing of spoken language. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 400–416.
45.
WINGFIELD, A., (1975). The intonation-syntax interaction: Prosodic features in perceptual processing of sentences. In A. Cohen and S.G. Nooteboom (Eds.), Structure and Process in Speech Perception (pp. 146–156). New York: Springer-Verlag.
46.
WITTE, P.L., (1980). What research on prosodic cues might have to say about comprehension and automaticity theory. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Reading Conference, Sarasota, Florida.
