Voice qualities function communicatively in various ways within social interactions. This study uses a matched guise technique, in which Australian speakers producing examples of breathy, creaky, nasal, tense, and whispery voices were evaluated by Australian and American listeners on the dimensions of status and solidarity. The major results indicated that high status was accorded to male tense voice, and high solidarity to female breathy voice. Both these results are in accordance with earlier studies. Nasal voice was evaluated low in status but somewhat higher on solidarity. Nasal voice has been associated with the non-standard “Broad Australian” speech variety. The last result, therefore, may indicate a type of accent loyalty, or be an example of the covert prestige accorded non-standard accents generally. No nationality of subject differences were found.
ADDINGTON, D.W., (1968). The relationship of selected vocal characteristics to personality perception. Speech Monographs, 35, 492–503.
2.
BEEMAN, S.D., (1964). Semantic Scaling of Vocal Quality. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.
3.
BRADAC, J.J., (1982). A rose by another name: Attitudinal consequences of lexical variation. In E.B. Ryan and II. Giles (eds.), Attitudes Towards Language Variation (pp. 99–115). London: Edward Arnold.
4.
BROWN, R. and GILMAN, A., (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T.A. Sebcok (Ed.), Style in Language (pp. 23–276). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
5.
BULLEN, A., (1942). Nasality: Cause and remedy of our American blight. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 28, 83–84.
6.
DAVITZ, J.R. and DAVITZ, L.J., (1959). The communication of feeling by content-free speech. Journal of Communication, 9, 6–13.
7.
DEVEREUX, G., (1949). Mohave voice and speech mannerisms. Word.5, 268–272.
8.
DUNCAN, S. Jr. and FISKE, D.W., (1977). Face to Face Interaction: Research Methods and Theory. New York: Wiley.
9.
EDWARDS, J.R., (1977). Students' reactions to Irish regional accents. Language and Speech, 20, 280–286.
10.
ESLING, J.H., (1978). Voice Quality in Edinburgh: A Sociolinguistic and Phonetic Study. Doctoral dissertation, Edinburgh University.
11.
FAIRBANKS, G., (1940). Voice and Articulation Drill Book. New York: Harper.
12.
FRIEDMAN, H., (1968). Magnitude of experimental effect and a table for its rapid calculation. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 245–251.
13.
FRIEDRICH, P., (1966). Structural implications of Russian pronominal usage. In W. Bright (Ed.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 214–259). The Hague: Mouton.
14.
GALLOIS, C. and CALLAN, V.J., (1981). Personality impressions elicited by accented English speech. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 12, 347–359.
15.
GALLOIS, C., CALLAN, V.J. and JOHNSTONE, M., (1984). Ethnicity, sex and context: Personality impressions of accented English among Australian Aborigine and white students. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 3, 39–57.
16.
GILES, H., (1973). Communicative effectiveness as a function of accented speech. Speech Monographs, 40, 330–331.
17.
GILES, H. and POWESLAND, P.F., (1975). Speech Style and Social Evaluation. London: Academic.
18.
GILES, H. and SASSOON, C., (1983). The effect of speaker's accent, social class background and message style on British listeners' social judgements. Language and Communication, 3, 305–313.
19.
GILES, H. and SMITH, P., (1979). Accommodation theory: Optimal levels of convergence. In H. Giles and R.N. St-Clair (Eds.), Language and Social Psychology (pp. 45–65). Oxford: Black-well.
20.
HELFRICH, H., (1979). Age markers in speech. In K. Scherer and H. Giles (Eds), Social Markers in Speech (pp. 63–107). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
KRAMARAE, C., (1982). Gender: How she speaks. In E.B. Ryan and H. Giles (Eds.), Attitudes Towards Language Variation (pp. 84–98). London: Edward Arnold.
22.
KRAMER, E., (1962). Judgement of Portrayed Emotion from Normal English, Filtered English and Japanese speech. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
23.
LAMBERT, W.E., (1967). A social psychology of bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues, 23, 91–109.
24.
LAMBERT, W.E., HODGSON, R.C., GARDNER, R.C. and FILLENBAUM, S., (1960). Evaluative reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 144–151.
25.
LAVER, J., (1972). Voice quality and indexical information. In J. Laver and S. Hutcheson (Eds.), Communication in Face to Face Interaction (pp. 189–203). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
26.
LAVER, J., (1980). The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
LAVER, J. and TRUDGILL, P., (1979). Phonetic and linguistic markers in speech. In K.R. Scherer and H. Giles (Eds.), Social Markers in Speech (pp. 1–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
LAVER, J., WIRZ, S., MACKENZIE, J. and HILLER, S., (1981). A perceptual protocol for the analysis of vocal profiles. Work in Progress (University of Edinburgh, Department of Linguistics), 14, 139–155.
29.
LEE, D.A., (1981). Review of Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 1, 127–134.
30.
LEE, D.A., (1984). Image and speech style in the Australian television commercial. Aumla, 61, 2–68.
31.
MACKIEWICZ-KRASSOWSKA, H., (1976). Nasality in Australian English. Working Papers (Macquarie University, Speech and Language Research Centre), 1 (3), 27–40.
32.
MEHRABIAN, A., (1972). Nonverbal Communication. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
33.
MEREDITH, L-A., (1844). Notes and Sketches of New South Wales, During a Residence in that Colony from 1839 to 1844. London: John Murray.
34.
MITCHELL, A.G. and DELBRIDGE, A., (1965). The Pronunciation of English in Australia. Sidney: Angus and Robertson.
35.
PAULSTON, C.B., (1976). Pronouns of address in Swedish: Social class semantics and a changing system. Language in Society, 5, 359–386.
36.
PTACEK, P.H., SANDER, E.K., MALONEY, W.H. and ROE JACKSON, C.C., (1966). Phonatory and related changes with advanced age. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 9, 353–360.
37.
ROGERS, P.L., SCHERER, K.R. and ROSENTHAL, R., (1971). Content-filtering human speech: A simple electronic system. Behavioural Research Methods and Instrumentation, 3, 16–18.
38.
RYAN, E.B. and CARRANZA, M.A., (1975): Evaluative reactions of adolescents toward speakers of standard English and Mexican accented English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 855–863.
39.
RYAN, E.B. and GILES, H., (eds.), (1982). Attitudes Towards Language Variation. London: Edward Arnold.
40.
SCHERER, K.R., (1971). Randomized splicing: A note on a simple technique for masking speech content. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 5, 155–159.
41.
SCHERER, K.R., (1979). Personality markers in speech. In. K.R. Scherer and H. Giles (Eds.), Social Markers in Speech (pp. 147–209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
SCHERER, K.R., (1982). Methods of research on vocal communication: Paradigms and parameters. In K.R. Scherer and P. Ekman (Eds.), Handbook of Methods in Nonverbal Behaviour Research (pp. 136–198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
SCHERER, K.R., (1986). Affect expression: A review and a model for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 143–165.
44.
SHARPE, M., (1970). Voice quality: A suggested framework for description and some observations. In S.A. Wurm and D.C. Laycock (Eds.), Pacific Studies in Honour of Arthur Capell (pp. 115–132). Canberra: Australian National University.
45.
SHERMAN, D., (1954). The merits of backward playing of connected speech in the scaling of voice-quality disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 19, 312–321.
46.
SHERMAN, D. and GOODWIN, F., (1954). Pitch level and nasality. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 19, 423–428.
47.
STREET, R.L. Jr., BRADY, R.M. and PUTMAN, W.B., (1983). The influence of speech rate stereotypes and rate similarity on listeners' evaluations of speakers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2, 37–56.
48.
TRUDGILL, P., (1974). The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
