Acoustical Characteristics of Sentential Focus: Narrow vs. Broad and Single vs. Dual Focus Environments

Abstract

Acoustical analyses of speech production were conducted to determine the effects of two types of sentence focus distinction on intonational attributes of fundamental voice frequency (F _o) and duration. In each of two experiments, analyses were performed on seven speakers who orally read sentences containing variations in focus prompted by preceding questions. In Experiment 1, speakers produced higher F _o peaks and longer word durations for words assigned narrow focus in comparison with the same words in neutral-focus sentences. Sentences bearing broad focus on the verb phrase, however, were produced with a widespread durational increase but no heightening of F _o peaks. In Experiment 2, speakers produced comparable F _o peaks and word durations for narrow-focused words regardless of whether the sentence contained one or two foci. The main difference between the single and dual focus sentences was that the word following an initial focused item in a dual-focus sentence did not exhibit the low F _o value characteristic of words that follow focused items. The lack of a low post-focus F _o in dual-focus sentences represents an anticipatory influence of the additional focus at the end of the sentence.

Keywords

sentential focus fundamental frequency duration

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chomsky, N. , (1971). Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. In D.D. Steinberg and L.A. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology (pp. 183–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clark, H.H. , (1973). The languagc-as-fixcd-cffect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359.

Cooper, W.E. , Eady, S.J. and Mueller, P.R. , (1985). Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, 2142–2156.

Cooper, W.E. and Paccia-Cooper, J. , (1980). Syntax and Speech Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cooper, W.E. and Sorensen, J. , (1981). Fundamental Frequency in Sentence Production. New-York: Springcr-Verlag.

Cutler, A. , (1976). Beyond parsing and lexical look-up: An enriched description of auditory sentence comprehension. In R.J. Wales and E. Walker (eds.), New Approaches to Language Mechanisms (pp. 133–149). New York: North-Holland Publishing.

Eady, S.J. and Cooper, W.E. , (1986). Speech intonation and focus location in matched statements and questions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80, 402–415.

Halliday, M.A.K. , (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3, 199–244.

Ladd, D.R. , (1980). The Structure of Intonational Meaning. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

10.

Nooteboom, S.G. and Kruyt, J.G., (1986). Accents, focus distribution, and the perceived distribution of given and new information: An experiment. Manuscript submitted to Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

11.

Selkirk, E.O. , (1984). Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

12.

Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. , (1980). Statistical Methods. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.

13.

Weismer, G. and Ingrisano, D. , (1979). Phrase-level timing patterns in English: Effects of emphatic stress location and speaking rate. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 22, 516–533.