Bever (1970) has proposed a number of strategies which can be applied during comprehension. According to one of these strategies, noun—verb—noun sequences are assumed to correspond to "actor—action—object." Using a sentence classification task, Experiment 1 provides evidence that such a strategy is indeed employed by adults. The results of Experiment 1, in conjunction with the data from a lexical decision task using the same materials (Experiment 2), also provide evidence that even weak semantic relations can produce substantial lexical priming effects during comprehension.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bever, T.G. ( 1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures . In J.R. Hayes (ed.), Cognition and the Development of Language (New York), pp. 279-362.
2.
Blank, M.S. and Foss, D.J. ( 1978). Semantic facilitation and lexical access during sentence processing. Memory and Cognition, 6, 644-b52.
3.
Chapnik-Smith, M. ( 1979). Contextual facilitation in a letter search task depends on how the prime is processed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 239-251.
4.
Fischler, I. and Bloom, P.A. ( 1979). Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 1-20.
5.
Fischler, I and Bloom, P.A. (1980). Rapid processing of the meaning of sentences. Memory and Cognition , 8, 216-225.
6.
Forster, K.I. ( 1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W.E. Cooper and E.C.T. Walker (eds.), Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett (Hillsdale, N.J.), pp. 27-85.
7.
Foss, D.J. and Ross, J.R. ( 1978). Great expectation: Context effects during sentence processing . Paper presented at the 12th International Congress of Psychology, July.
8.
Foss, D.J. and Swinney, D.A. ( 1973). On the psychological reality of the phoneme: Perception, identification and consciousness. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 246-257.
9.
Fraser, C., Bellugi, U. and Brown, R.W. ( 1963). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production . Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior , 2, 121-135.
10.
Holyoak, K.J. and Glass, A.L. ( 1975). The role of contradictions and counterexamples in the rejection of false sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verhal Behavior, 14, 215-239.
11.
Kiger, J.I. and Glass, A.L. ( 1983). The facilitation of lexical decisions by a prime occurring after the target. Memory and Cognition, 11, 356-365.
12.
Kintsch, W. ( 1972). Notes on the structure of semantic memory. In E. Tulving and W. Donaldson (eds.), Organization of Memory (New York), pp. 247-308.
13.
Meyer, D.E. ( 1970). On the representation and retrieval of stored semantic information. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 242-300.
14.
Parkin, A.J. ( 1979). Specifying levels of processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 175-195.
15.
Rips, L.J., Shoben, E.J. and Smith, E.E. ( 1973). Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations . Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior , 12, 1-20.
16.
Schuberth, R.E. and Eimas, P.D. ( 1977). Effects of context on the classification of words and non-words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 27-36.
17.
Wilkins, A.T. ( 1971). Conjoint frequency, category size, and categorization time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 382-385.
