Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Certain verbs imply specific instruments, and readers appear to make such inferences when reading the verb (Garrod and Sanford, 1981). For other verbs the implications seem much weaker and no specific inferences are made when reading the verb (Singer, 1979). The present studies explore the reasons for this disparity. A study of dictionary entries for the two kinds of verbs suggested that instruments for Garrod and Sanford verbs are a more inherent part of the definition than they are for Singer verbs. However, two measures of verb-instrument relation, (instrument generation tasks), showed no difference between the two sets of verbs. Experiment I, using a mixture of verb types, excluded methodological factors as the reason for the different findings of Garrod and Sanford and Singer. It pointed to there being verb differences which are tapped by a reading task and not by questionnaires, where there are no time pressures. Experiments II and III measured the strength of the verb-instrument relation using a "word-recognition" task and found that one set of verbs (Garrod and Sanford) seemed to be more closely linked with particular indirect objects than did the other set (Singer). In Experiment IV, reading was slowed by the introduction of an uncommon instrument only after mentioning a verb from the set having stronger verb-instrument links (Garrod and Sanford verbs). Experimental results, together with the dictionary study, supported the idea of "semantic-relatedness" for Garrod and Sanford verbs, and their instruments contrasted with "association" for Singer verbs. Experiment V examined the relationship between a category and its noun exemplar. Reading was slowed by the introduction of an uncommon exemplar suggesting that a category is instantiated at the time of reading. This effect was stronger than that found previously for verbs suggesting that verbs and nouns differ in the structure of their semantic representations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Battig, W.F. and Montague, W.E. ( 1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories . Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement , 80.

Corbett, A.T. and Dosher, B.A. ( 1978). Instrument inferences in sentence encoding. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 479 491.

Garnham, A. ( 1982). Testing psychological theories about inference making . Memory and Cognition, 10, 341-357.

Garrod, S. and Sanford, A. ( 1981). Bridging inferences and the extended domain of references . In J. Long and A. Baddeley (eds.), A ttention and Performance IX (Hillsdale, N.J.), pp. 331-346.

Gentner, D. ( 1981). Verb semantic structures in memory for sentences: Evidence for componential representation. Cognitive Psychology , 3, 56-83.

Gentner, D. (In press). Some interesting differences between verbs and nouns. Cognition and Brain Theory, 4.

Green, D. ( 1975). The effects of tasks on the representation of sentences . Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior , 14, 275-283.

Haviland, S.E. and Clark, H.H. ( 1974). What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior , 13, 512-5 21.

Johnson, M.F. , Bransford, J.D. and Solomon, S.K. ( 1973). Memory for tacit implications of sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98, 203-205.

10.

McKoon, G. and Ratcliff, R. ( 1980). The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in anaphoric reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 668-682.

11.

Paris, S.G. and Lindauer, B.K. ( 1976). The role of inference in children's comprehension and memory for sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 8,217-227.

12.

Singer, M. ( 1977). Inferences about instruments: Response norms. Manuscript , University of Manitoba.

13.

Singer, M. ( 1979). Processes of inference during sentence encoding . Memory and Cognition, 7, 192-200.

14.

Winer, B.J. ( 1971). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design (New York) .

Inferring Indirect Objects in Sentences: Some Implications for the Semantics of Verbs

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References