Social Class and Grammatical Development: a Comparison of the Speech of Five Year Olds From Middle and Working Class Backgrounds

Abstract

A picture-strip task was used to elicit speech from 36 middle and working class children; this speech was later transcribed and analysed according to traditional grammar. It was found that the working class children made greater use of verbs and pronouns, whereas the middle class children made greater use of subordinate clauses. When further analysis was carried out into the choice made between nouns and pronouns in the subject position of sentences, working class children were found to make greater use of pronouns in this position, while middle class children made greater use of nouns. It was suggested that this preference may arise from social class differences in the functional use of language by young children, and the communication demands made of them in their social environment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baratz, J. ( 1970). Teaching reading in an urban Negro school system . In F. Williams (ed.), Language and Poverty (Chicago), 11-24.

Bereiter, C. and Engelmann, S. ( 1966). Teaching Disadvantaged Children in the Preschool . (Engelwood Cliffs, New Jersey).

Bernstein, B. ( 1962). Social class, linguistic codes, and grammatical elements . Lang. Speech, 5, 221-40.

Bernstein, B. ( 1970). A sociolinguistic approach to social learning: with some reference to educability. In F. Williams (ed.), Language and Poverty (Chicago), 25-61.

Bloom, L. ( 1970). Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammars (Cambridge, Mass.).

Deutsch, M. ( 1963). The disadvantaged child and the learning process: some psychological and developmental considerations. In A. H. Passow (ed.), Education in Depressed Areas (New York) , 163-79.

Dewart, M.H. ( 1972). Social class and children's understanding of deep structures in sentences. Brit. J. educ. Psychol., 42, 198-203.

Fraser, C. , Bellugi, U. , and Brown, R. ( 1963). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension and production . J. verb. Learn. verb. Behav., 2, 121-35.

Hawkins, P.R. ( 1969). Social class, the nominal group and reference . Lang. Speech, 12, 125-35.

10.

Henderson, D. ( 1970). Social class differences in form-class usage among five year old children. In W. Brandis and D. Henderson (eds.), Social Class, Language and Communication (London).

11.

Labov, W. ( 1970). The logic of non-standard English. In F. Williams (ed.), Language and Poverty (Chicago) , 153-89.

12.

Lacivita, A. , Kean, J.M. , and Yamamoto, K. ( 1966). Socio-economic status of children and acquisition of grammar. J. educ. Res., 60, 71-4.

13.

Lawton, D. ( 1968). Social Class, Language, and Education (London) .

14.

Nurss, J.R. and Day, D.E. ( 1971). Imitation, comprehension, and production of grammatical structures. J. verb. Learn. verb. Behav., 10, 68-74.

15.

Osser, H. , Wang , and Zaid, F. (1969). The young child's ability to imitate and comprehend speech: a comparison of two subcultural groups. Child Developm., 36, 467-80.

16.

Rackstraw, S.J. and Robinson, W.P. ( 1967). Social and psychological factors related to variability of answering behaviour in five-year-old children. Lang. Speech , 10, 88-106.

17.

Registrar General (1970). Classification of Occupations (London).

18.

Shield, M.M. ( 1974). The development of the modal auxiliary system in the verb phrase in children between three and five years. Educ. Rev., 26, 180-200.

19.

Shriner, T.H. and Miner, L. ( 1968). Morphological structures in the language of disadvantaged and advantaged children. J. Speech. Hear. Dis., 11, 605-10.

20.

Tough, J. ( 1974). Children's use of language. Educ. Rev. , 26, 166-79.

21.

Williams, F. and Naremore, R.C. ( 1969). On the functional analysis of social class differences in modes of speech. Speech Monogr., 36, 77-102.

22.

Winer, B.J. ( 1962). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design (New York) .