A paired comparison paradigm was employed to determine the listening rate preferences of children. Recordings of a reading of a standard prose passage were time-altered by means of a speech compressor to yield nine rates: 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250, 275, and 300 wpm. A master tape was constructed from the time-altered versions of the reading and presented to 49 children for their listening rate preference judgments. Results indicate that the children's most preferred listening rate was 175 wpm and their least preferred rate was 100 wpm. Comparisons of the present findings with the listening rate preferences of adults, as well as suggestions for future inquiry, are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Breuel, J.W., and Levens, L.M. ( 1971). The A.F.B. harmonic compressor. In Foulke, E. (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Louisville Conference on Rate and/or Frequency Controlled Speech ( Louisville, Kentucky), 185.
2.
Cain, C.J. and Lass, N.J. ( 1974). Listening rate preferences of adults. In Ducker, S. (ed.), Time-Compressed Speech: An Anthology and Bibliography (Metuchen, N.J.).
3.
Campanella, S.J. ( 1967). Signal analysis of speech time-compression techniques . In Foulke, E. (ed.), Proceedings of the Louisville Conference on Time-Compressed Speech ( Louisville, Kentucky), 108.
4.
Fairbanks, G. ( 1960). Voice and Articulation Drillbook ( New York).
5.
Fairbanks, G., Everitt, W.L. and Jaeger, R.P. ( 1954). Method for time or frequency compression-expansion of speech. Trans. Inst. Radio Engineers Professional Group on Audio AU2, 7.
6.
Foulke, E. ( 1965). A survey of the acceptability of rapid speech . New Outlook for the Blind,. 60, 261.
7.
Foulke, E. ( 1970). Methods of controlling the word rate of recorded speech . J. Commun., 20, 305.
8.
Foulke, E. and Sticht, T.G. ( 1966). Listening rate preferences of college students for literary material of moderate difficulty. J. auditory Res., 6, 397.
9.
Graham, W.W. ( 1971). The Graham compressor: a technical development of the Fairbanks method. In Foulke, E. (ed.). Proceedings of the Second Louisville Conference on Rate and/or Frequency Controlled Speech (Louisville, Kentucky), 193.
10.
Guilford, J.P. ( 1954). Psychometric Methods (New York ), 154.
11.
Hutton, C.L. ( 1954). A psychophysical study of speech rate. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.
12.
Iverson, L. ( 1956). Time compression. Int. J. Educ. Blind , 5, 78.
13.
Lass, N.J. and Cain, C.J. ( 1972). A correlational study of listening rate preferences and listeners' oral reading rates. J. auditory Res., 12, 308.
14.
Lass, N.J. and Prater, C.E. ( 1973). A comparative study of listening rate preferences for oral reading and impromptu speaking tasks. J. Commun. , 23, 95.
15.
Mattingly, I.G. ( 1967). Speech synthesis by rule as a research technique . J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 41, 1588.
16.
Ross, R.T. ( 1934). Optimal orders for the presentation of pairs in the method of paired comparisons. J. educ. Psychol., 25, 375.
