Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The index of contingency of Becker et al. is not a satisfactory measure of redundancy since (1) the measure of reconstitution against which it was validated does not co-vary with noun repetitions in all circumstances. (2) The assumption that sentence meanings are basically carried by nouns produces anomalies in the comparative judgement of passages with large amounts of noun repetition and minimal verb repetition and passages with large amounts of verb repetition and minimal noun repetition. It is suggested that for much moderately redundant English the index seems to work because it co-varies with other aspects of sentence complexity. Becker and Carroll's view of the relationship between interest of a passage and the contingency of sentences within that passage is questioned.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Becker, S.W. , Bavelas, A. and Braden, M. ( 1961). An index to measure contingency of English sentences . Language and Speech, 4, 139.

Becker, S.W. and Carroll, J. ( 1963). The effects of high and low contingency on learning and attitudes. Language and Speech, 6, 46.

Burton, N.G. and Licklider, J.C.R. ( 1955). Long-range constraints in the statistical structure of printed English. Amer. J. Psychol., 68, 650.

Dorfman, D.D. and Mckenna, H. ( 1966). Pattern preference as a function of pattern uncertainty. Canad. J. Psychol., 20, 143.

Munsinger, H. and Kessen, W. ( 1964). Uncertainty, structure and preference. Psychol. Monogr., 78, no. 586.

Parry, J. ( 1967). The Psychology of Human Communication ( London).

Pease, K. ( 1969). The great evaders. New Society , No. 365, October 2nd, 507.

Shannon, C. and Weaver, W. ( 1949). Mathematical Theory of Communication ( Urbana, Illinois).

The Index of Contingency : a Critique

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References