The existence of a universal sound symbolism is still controversial. Evidence is presented for a universal sound symbolism in a constellation of words in natural languages relating to proximity and distance. The discussion ranges from words relating to physical distance to terms of temporal and personal distance. Several explanations for the appearance of sound symbolism in this domain are suggested, including one based on their attributes as " shifters " or " indexical symbols ".
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brown, R. ( 1958). Words and Things (Glencoe).
2.
Brown, R. ( 1965). Social Psychology (New York ).
3.
Burke, K. ( 1941). The Philosophy of Literary Form ( New York).
4.
Cassirer, E. ( 1965). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Vol. 1 (New Haven).
5.
Chastaing, M. ( 1958). Le symbolisme des voyelles. Signification des I. Journal de Psychologie, LV, 403, 461.
6.
Jakobson, R. ( 1957). Shifters, Verbal Categories and the Russian Verb ( Harvard).
7.
Jespersen, O. ( 1922). Language, its Nature, Development and Origin ( London).
8.
Johnson, R.C. ( 1967). Magnitude symbolism of English words. J. verb. Learn. verb. Behav., 6, 508.
9.
Leach, E. ( 1964). Anthropological aspects of language: animal categories and verbal abuse. In Lenneberg, E. H., New Directions in the Study of Language (Cambridge ).
10.
Miron, M.S. ( 1961). A cross-linguistic investigation of phonetic symbolism . J. abn. soc. Psych., 62, 623.
11.
Sapir, E. ( 1929). A study in phonetic symbolism. J. exp. Psych., 12, 225.
12.
Slobin, D. (unpublished). Antonymic phonetic symbolism in three natural languages.
13.
Ullmann, S. ( 1963). Semantic universals. In Greenberg, J., Universals of Language (Cambridge).
