Measurements were made of the intensities of vowels produced in isolation and in CVC syllables by three adult speakers. It was found that the predicted direct relationship with vowel opening did not apply to vowel intensity measures obtained. Similar results were found for both level recorder and voltmeter measurements. The lack of predicted relationship did not appear to be due to any effect of consonant environment. Increasing vocal effort did tend to increase the intensity of open vowels more than that of close vowels. It is suggested that reversals in the predicted relationship between vowel intensity and vowel opening may be due to variations in vocal effort and in voice quality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Black, J.W. ( 1949). Natural frequency, duration, and intensity of vowels in reading. J. Speech Hear. Dis., 14, 3.
2.
Chiba, T. and Kajiyama, M. ( 1958). The Vowel, Its Nature and Structure ( Tokyo).
3.
Fairbanks, G. ( 1950). A physiological correlative of vowel intensity . Speech Monogr., 17, 390.
4.
Fairbanks, G., House, A.S. and Stevens, E.L. ( 1950). An experimental study of vowel intensities. J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 22, 457.
5.
House, A.S. and Fairbanks, G. ( 1953). The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. 7. acoust. Soc. Amer., 25, 105.
6.
Lehiste, I. and Peterson, G.E. ( 1959). Vowel amplitude and phonemic stress in American English. Report No. 3 (Part 1 ; Studies of Syllable Nuclei), Speech Research Laboratory, University of Michigan.
7.
Licklider, J.C.R., Hawley, M. and Walkling, R.A. ( 1955). Influences of variations in speech intensity and other factors upon the speech spectrum (Abstract). J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 27, 207.
8.
Stevens, K.N. and House, A.S. ( 1961). An acoustical theory of vowel production and some of its implications. J. Speech Hear. Res., 4, 303.
