Words from undefined word sets were presented to listeners over a white noise background. Response times to the words were examined as a function of the frequency of word occurrence in the language and as a function of the S/N ratio under test. The effect of S/N ratio and practice was large in comparison with the effect of word frequency. The results are discussed in terms of memory search through a set of “available” response alternatives rollowing word presentation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Crossman, E. R. F. W. (1955). The measure of discriminability. Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 7, 176.
2.
Davis, R., Moray, N. and Treisman, A. (1961). Imitative responses and the rate of gain of information. Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 13, 78.
3.
Dichter, M. F. (1960). Reaction times to monosyllables as a function of ensemble size. S. B. Thesis, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Mass. Inst. Technology.
4.
Edwards, R. (1962). Reaction times to monosyllables as a function of noise level. S. B. Thesis, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Mass. Inst. Technology.
5.
Fitts, P. M. and Switzer, G. (1962). Cognitive aspects of information processing. J. exp. Psychol., 63, 321.
6.
Goldiamond, I. and Hawkins, W. F. (1958). Vexierversuch: the log relationship between word-frequency and recognition obtained in the absence of stimulus words. J. exp. Psychol., 56, 457.
7.
Henman, V. O. C. (1906). The time of perception as a measure of differences in sensation. Arch. Philos. Psychol. Sci. Meth., 8, 73.
8.
Howes, D. (1957). On the relation between the intelligibility and frequency of occurrence of English words. J. acoust. Soc. Am., 29, 296.
9.
Howes, D. and Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual duration threshold as a function of wordprobability. J. exp. Psychol., 41, 401.
10.
Lemmon, V. W. (1927). The relation of reaction-time to measures of intelligence, memory and learning. Arch. Psychol., 15, No. 94, 38.
11.
Leonard, J. A. (1959). Tactual choice reactions. Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 11, 76.
12.
Mowbray, G. H. and Rhoades, M. V. (1959). On the reduction of choice reaction times with practice. Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 11, 16.
13.
Savin, H. B. (1963). Word-frequency effect and errors in the perception of speech. J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 35, 200.
14.
Pollack, I., Rubenstein, H. and Decker, L. (1959). Intelligibility of known and unknown message sets. J. acoust. Soc. Am., 31, 273.
15.
Pollack, I., Rubenstein, H. and Decker, L. (1960). Analysis of incorrect responses to an unknown message set. J. acoust. Soc. Am., 32, 454.
16.
Pollack, I., and Rubenstein, H. (1963). Response times to known message sets in noise. Language and Speech, 6, 57.
17.
Rosensweig, M. R. and Postman, L. (1957). Intelligibility as a function of frequency of usage. J. exp. Psychol., 54, 412.
18.
Saslow, M. G. (1958). Reaction times to consonant vowel syllables in ensembles of various sizes. Quart. Progress Report X. Speech Communications, Research Laboratory for Electronics, Mass. Inst. Technology.
19.
Thorndike, E. L. and Lorge, I. (1944). The Teacher's Word Book of 30,000 Words (Columbia University, New York).
