Intelligibility tests were conducted with monosyllabic, bisyllabic and trisyllabic words under conditions of known and unknown message sets. Longer words were found to be more intelligible than shorter words in both known and unknown message sets. Differences in intelligibility among the different lengths are interpreted in terms of acoustic discriminability and relative word frequency.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BELL, D. A. (1953). The ‘internal information’ of English words in Communication Theory ed. by W. Jackson (London).
2.
HERDAN, G. (1956). Language as Choice and Chance (Groningen).
3.
Howes, D. (1957). On the relation between the intelligibility and frequency of occurrence of English words. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 29, 296.
4.
Pollack, I., Rubenstein, H. and Decker, L. (1959). Intelligibility of known and unknown message sets. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 31, 273.
5.
THORNDIKE, E. L. and LORGE, I. (1944). The Teacher's Word Book of 30,000 Words (New York).
