Previous research has shown that tonal second language (L2) experience can enhance the third language (L3) tone perception of native speakers of non-tone languages. However, tone is a multidimensional concept, and phonation type also serves as an important cue in the tone perception of some tone languages. In this study, 38 native English speakers of different Mandarin proficiency levels, 15 native English and 15 native Mandarin speakers, all of whom were naïve to the Wenzhou Wu dialect, participated in an AX discrimination task. The Wenzhou dialect was used for the naïve L3 stimuli because of its breathy voice feature in the low-register tones. Mandarin Tone 3 (T3) is often realized with creaky voice, while in English, creaky voice is a prosodic and sociophonetic marker. We asked whether the exposure to one phonation type (creaky voice) at a different linguistic level (indexical in English, allophonic in Mandarin) could lead to better performance on another phonation type (breathy voice). Our results showed that in addition to its effect on pitch perception, Mandarin-learning experience was associated with higher accuracy in phonation perception for native English speakers, and high-level L2 learners could even outperform native Mandarin speakers. Longer length of Mandarin-learning and Mandarin-immersion experience had a facilitative effect on naïve L3 tone perception, resulting in higher accuracy in the perception of both pitch and phonation to varying degrees. Moreover, the study demonstrated that acoustic similarity significantly affects pitch perception in the initial stages of L3 processing, with acoustically similar tone pairs posing greater perceptual difficulty than dissimilar pairs.
Abdelli-BeruhN.DrugmanT.OwlR. H. (2016). Occurrence frequencies of acoustic patterns of vocal fry in American English speakers. Journal of Voice, 30(6), 759.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.09.011
Anwyl-IrvineA. L.MassonniéJ.FlittonA.KirkhamN.EvershedJ. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
4.
BardelC.FalkY. (2007). The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307080557
5.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB. M.WalkerS. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
6.
Belotel-GreniéA.GreniéM. (1994). Phonation types analysis in standard Chinese. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Yokohama, Japan (pp. 343–346). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/icslp.1994-89
7.
Belotel-GreniéA.GreniéM. (1997). Types de phonation et tons en chinois standard (Phonation types and tones in standard Chinese). Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale, 26, 249–279.
8.
BestC. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In StrangeW. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues in cross-language speech research (pp. 171–204). York Press.
9.
BestC. T.McRobertsG. W.GoodellE. (2001). Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener’s native phonological system. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(2), 775–794. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1332378
10.
BestC. T.McRobertsG. W.SitholeN. M. (1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(3), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.345
BrunelleM. (2009). Northern and southern Vietnamese tone coarticulation: A comparative case study. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (JSEALS), 1(1), 49–62.
13.
Caldwell-HarrisC. L.LancasterA.LaddD. R.DediuD.ChristiansenM. H. (2015). Factors influencing sensitivity to lexical tone in an artificial language: Implications for second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(2), 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000849
14.
ChaiY. (2019). The source of creak in Mandarin utterances. In Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia (pp. 1858–1862). Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc., and International Phonetic Association.
15.
ChanI. L.ChangC. B. (2019). Perception of nonnative tonal contrasts by Mandarin-English and English-Mandarin sequential bilinguals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146(2), 956–972. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5120522
16.
ChaoY. R. (1930). A system of tone letters. Le Maître Phonétique, 45, 24–27.
17.
ChaoY. R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. University of California Press.
18.
ChenJ.BestC. T.AntoniouM. (2020). Native phonological and phonetic influences in perceptual assimilation of monosyllabic Thai lexical tones by Mandarin and Vietnamese listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 83, 101013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2020.101013
ChiaoW.-H.KabakB.BraunB. (2011). When more is less: Non-native perception of level tone contrasts. In Proceedings of the Psycholinguistic Representation of Tone Conference, Hong Kong, China (pp. 42–45). Psycholinguistic Representation of Tone.
21.
CooperA.WangY. (2012). The influence of linguistic and musical experience on Cantonese word learning. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(6), 4756–4769. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4714355
22.
DallastonK.DochertyG. (2020). The quantitative prevalence of creaky voice (vocal fry) in varieties of English: A systematic review of the literature. PLOS ONE, 15(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229960
23.
DavisonD. S. (1991). An acoustic study of so-called creaky voice in Tianjin Mandarin. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 78, 50–57.
FlynnS.FoleyC.VinnitskayaI. (2004). The Cumulative-Enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710408668175
26.
FrancisA. L.CioccaV.MaL.FennK. (2008). Perceptual learning of Cantonese lexical tones by tone and non-tone language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 36(2), 268–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2007.06.005
27.
Gallardo del PuertoF. (2007). Is L3 phonological competence affected by the learner’s level of bilingualism?International Journal of Multilingualism, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2167/ijm042.0
28.
GandourJ. T.HarshmanR. A. (1978). Crosslanguage differences in tone perception: A multidimensional scaling investigation. Language and Speech, 21(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097802100101
29.
GarciaA. (2013). The effects of L2 proficiency on L3 phonological acquisition: A preliminary test of the L2 proficiency hypothesis. In VossE.TaiS.-J. D.LiZ. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2011 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 173–186). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
30.
GarellekM.KeatingP.EspositoC. M.KreimanJ. (2013). Voice quality and tone identification in White Hmong. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(2), 1078–1089. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4773259
31.
GiancasproD.HalloranB.IversonM. (2015). Transfer at the initial stages of L3 Brazilian Portuguese: A look at three groups of English/Spanish bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000339
HammarbergB. (2001). Roles of L1 and L2 in L3 production and acquisition. In CenozJ.HufeisenB.JessnerU. (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 21–41). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853595509-003
34.
HentonC. G. (1986). Creak as a sociophonetic marker. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80(S1), S50–S50. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2023837
35.
HuangY. (2020). Different attributes of creaky voice distinctly affect Mandarin tonal perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(3), 1441–1458. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0000721
36.
JongmanA.QinZ.ZhangJ.SerenoJ. A. (2017). Just noticeable differences for pitch direction, height, and slope for Mandarin and English listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(2), EL163–EL169. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4995526
37.
KopečkováR.GutU.WrembelM.BalasA. (2022). Phonological cross-linguistic influence at the initial stages of L3 acquisition. Second Language Research, 39(4), 1107–1131. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583221123994
KreimanJ.GerrattB. R. (2010). Perceptual sensitivity to first harmonic amplitude in the voice source. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(4), 2085–2089. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3478784
40.
KuangJ. (2011). Production and perception of the phonation contrast in Yi [MA thesis]. University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
41.
KuangJ. (2013a). Phonation in tonal contrasts [Doctoral dissertation]. University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
LamérisT. J. (2022). The effect of lexical status of pitch in the L1 and extralinguistic factors on L2 tone acquisition. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Lisbon, Portugal (pp.708–712). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2022-144
LiQ.CaoW. (2007). Riben xuesheng hanyu danzidiao de yangping yu shangsheng (The features of Mandarin tone 2 and tone 3 by Japanese students learning Chinese as a second language). Ninth National Conference on Man-Machine Speech Communication, Huangshan, China.
QinZ.JongmanA. (2016). Does second language experience modulate perception of tones in a third language?Language and Speech, 59(3), 318–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830915590191
48.
QinZ.MokP. (2011). Perception of Cantonese tones by Mandarin, English and French speakers. In Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong, China (pp. 1654–1657). City University of Hong Kong.
49.
QinZ.MokP. (2012). The perception of speech and non-speech tones by tone and non-tone language listeners. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Shanghai, China (pp. 366–369). Tongji University Press. https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2012-93
50.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
51.
RothmanJ. (2011). L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research, 27(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310386439
52.
RothmanJ. (2015). Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891300059X
53.
SaitoK.IlkanM.MagneV.TranM. N.SuzukiS. (2018). Acoustic characteristics and learner profiles of low-, mid-and high-level second language fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(3), 593–617. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716417000571
54.
SchaeferV.DarcyI. (2020). Applying a newly learned second language dimension to the unknown: The influence of second language Mandarin tones on the naïve perception of Thai tones. Psychology of Language and Communication, 24(1), 90–123. https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2020-0007
55.
SoC. K.BestC. T. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53(2), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830909357156
56.
SooR.MonahanP. J. (2022). Phonetic and lexical encoding of tone in Cantonese heritage speakers. Language and Speech, 66(3), 652–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309221122090
57.
SypiańskaJ.CalZ. (2020). The influence of level of proficiency in the L2 and L3 on the production of the L3 Spanish apico-alveolar sibilant. Research in Language, 18(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.18.1.06
58.
TsaoF. M. (2008). The effect of acoustical similarity on lexical-tone perception of one-year-old Mandarin-learning infants. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 50(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.2008.5002.01
59.
Van WayJ. (2014). Effect of creaky voice simulation on third-tone perception in Mandarin Chinese. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa: Working Papers in Linguistics, 45(3), 1–13.
60.
WangT.PotterC. E.SaffranJ. R. (2020). Plasticity in second language learning: The case of Mandarin tones. Language Learning and Development : The Official Journal of the Society for Language Development, 16(3), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2020.1737072
61.
WangX. (2006). Perception of L2 tones: L1 lexical tone experience may not help. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Speech Prosody, Dresden, Germany (paper 240). TUD Press. https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2006-25
WaylandR. P.GuionS. G. (2004). Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 54(4), 681–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00283.x
64.
WienerS.GossS. (2019). Second and third language learners’ sensitivity to Japanese pitch accent is additive. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(4), 897–910. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000068
65.
WolkL.Abdelli-BeruhN. B.SlavinD. C. (2012). Habitual use of vocal fry in young adult female speakers. Journal of Voice, 26(3), e111–e116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.04.007
66.
WuM.BakerB.FletcherJ.Bundgaard-NielsenR. (2016). How pitch moves: Production of Cantonese tones by speakers with different tonal experiences. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages, New York, USA (pp. 133–137). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/TAL.2016-29
67.
YangR. X. (2011). The phonation factor in the categorical perception of Mandarin tones. In Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong, China (pp. 2204–2207). City University of Hong Kong.
68.
YangR. X. (2015). The role of phonation cues in Mandarin tonal perception. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 43(1), 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2015.0035
69.
YuK. M.LamH. W. (2014). The role of creaky voice in Cantonese tonal perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(3), 1320–1333. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4887462
70.
YuasaI. P. (2010). Creaky voice: A new feminine voice quality for young urban-oriented upwardly mobile American women?American Speech, 85(3), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2010-018
71.
ZengW.SheaC. (2024). Phonetic and phonological factors in cross-dialectal tone perception. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Leiden, The Netherlands (pp. 422–426). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2024-86
72.
ZhangW. (2024). Interaction between tones and segments in Wenzhou Wu Chinese: Articulation, perception and sound change [Doctoral dissertation]. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
73.
ZhangW.MokP. (2020). A potential new sound change after tonogenesis: A preliminary perceptual study on the tonal contrast of Wenzhou Wu Chinese. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Tokyo, Japan (pp. 499–502). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2020-102
74.
ZhangW.MokP. (2024). Asymmetries of onset manner of articulation in the perception of tone register contrast in Wenzhou Wu Chinese. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Leiden, The Netherlands (pp. 572–576). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2024-116
75.
ZhangY.KirbyJ. (2020). The role of F0 and phonation cues in Cantonese low tone perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 148(1), EL40–EL45. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0001523
Zheng-ZhangS. (2008). Wenzhou Fangyan Zhi [Wenzhou Language Records]. Zhonghua Book Company.
78.
ZhuM.ChenF.ChenX.YangY. (2023). The more the better? Effects of L1 tonal density and typology on the perception of non-native tones. PLOS ONE, 18(9), Article e0291828. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291828
79.
ZouT.CaspersJ.ChenY. (2022). Perception of different tone contrasts at sub-lexical and lexical levels by Dutch learners of Mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 891756. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4055329
80.
ZouT.ChenY.CaspersJ. (2017). The developmental trajectories of attention distribution and segment-tone integration in Dutch learners of Mandarin tones. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(5), 1017–1029. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000791
