The study aims to contribute to the understanding of the role of the putamen–claustrum–insular region (region of interest, ROI) in speech motor control processes, considering functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and acoustic analysis. Forty-three neurotypical participants performed visually presented motor planning and execution tasks (two highly frequent non-word CV-syllable sequences), which differ in gestural complexity. First, it can be shown that the ROI generally plays a role during motor planning and motor execution. Second, comparing blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) responses across the complexity conditions revealed that syllables with greater gestural complexity elicited increased activation in the bilateral ROI. This region may help to coordinate articulatory movements in articulatory subsystems. The intricacy of these glottal and supraglottal articulatory movements defines the gestural complexity of the respective speech sound. Finally, our results suggest that these differences in BOLD response in the ROI reflect the differential contribution of articulatory mechanisms that are required to produce phonologically distinct speech sounds.
AbutalebiJ.RosaP. A. D.GonzagaA. K.KeimR.CostaA.PeraniD. (2013). The role of the left putamen in multilingual language production. Brain and Language, 125(3), 307–315.
2.
AckermannH.RieckerA. (2004). The contribution of the insula to motor aspects of speech production: A review and a hypothesis. Brain and Language, 89(2), 320–328.
BohlandJ. W.BullockD.GuentherF. H. (2010). Neural representations and mechanisms for the performance of simple speech sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(7), 1504–1529.
8.
BoothJ. R.WoodL.LuD.HoukJ. C.BitanT. (2007). The role of the basal ganglia and cerebellum in language processing. Brain Research, 1133(1), 136–144.
9.
BrownS. P.MathurB. N.OlsenS. R.LuppiP. H.BickfordM. E.CitriA. (2017). New breakthroughs in understanding the role of functional interactions between the neocortex and the claustrum. Journal of Neuroscience, 37(45), 10877–10881.
10.
ChoT.LadefogedP. (1999). Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics, 272, 207–229.
11.
ChomskyN.HalleM. (1968). The sound pattern of English. Harper, Row.
12.
CorreiaJ. M.Caballero-GaudesC.GuedicheS.CarreirasM. (2020). Phonatory and articulatory representations of speech production in cortical and subcortical fMRI responses. Scientific Reports, 10(1), Article 4529. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61435-y
13.
CrickF. C.KochC. (2005). What is the function of the claustrum?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 360, 1271–1279.
14.
DietrichM.AndreattaR. D.JiangY.StempleJ. C. (2020). Limbic and cortical control of phonation for speech in response to a public speech preparation stressor. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 4, 1696–1713.
15.
DillinghamC. M.JankowskiM. M.ChandraR.FroistB. E.O’MaraS. M. (2017). The claustrum: Considerations regarding its anatomy, functions and a programme for research. Brain and Neuroscience Advances, 1, 1–9.
16.
DogilG.AckermannH.GroddW.HaiderH.KampH.MayerJ.RieckerA.WildgruberD. (2002). The speaking brain: A tutorial introduction to fMRI experiments in the production of speech, prosody and syntax. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 15, 59–90.
17.
DogilG.AckermannH.MayerJ.RieckerD.WildgruberD. (2003). Das Sprechnetzwerk im menschlichen Gehirn: Evidenz aus der funktionellen Kernspintomographie und aus der Klinik. In: MüllerH. M.RickheitG. (Hrsg.), Neurokognition der Sprache (pp. 191–210). Tübingen.
18.
DraganskiB.KherifF.KlöppelS.CookP. A.AlexanderD. C.ParkerG. J. M.FrackowiakR. S. J. (2008). Evidence for segregated and integrative connectivity patterns in the human basal ganglia. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(28), 7143–7152.
19.
DrugaR. (2014). The structure and connections of the claustrum. In: SmythiesJ. R.EdelsteinL. R.RamachandranV.S. (Eds.), The claustrum: Structural, functional, and clinical neuroscience (pp. 29–84). Elsevier Academic Press.
20.
EdelsteinL. R.DenaroF. J. (2004). The claustrum: A historical review of its anatomy, physiology, cytochemistry and functional significance. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 50(6), 675–702.
21.
EulitzC.ElbertT.BartensteinP.WeillerC.MüllerS. P.PantevC. (1994). Comparison of magnetic and metabolic brain activity during a verb generation task. Neuroreport, 6, 97–100.
22.
FauvelB.GroussardM.ChételatG.FouquetM.LandeauB.EustacheF.DesgrangesB.PlatelH. (2014). Morphological brain plasticity induced by musical expertise is accompanied by modulation of functional connectivity at rest. NeuroImage, 90, 179–188.
23.
Fernandez-MirandaJ. C.PathakS.EnghJ.JarboK.VerstynenT.YehF.-C.WangY.MintzA.BoadaF.SchneiderW.FriedlanderR. (2012). High-definition tractography of the human brain: Neuroanatomical validation and neurosurgical applications. Neurosurgery, 71(2), 430453.
24.
Fernandez-MirandaJ. C.RhotonA. L.JrKakizawaY.ChoiC.Alvarez-LineraJ. (2008). The claustrum and its projection system in the human brain: A microsurgical and tractographic anatomical study. Journal of Neurosurgery, 108, 764–774.
25.
FriedericiA. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2), 78–84.
26.
FristonK. J.HolmesA. P.PolineJ. B.GrasbyP. J.WilliamsS. C.FrackowiakR. S. (1995). Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited. NeuroImage, 2, 45–53.
27.
Gil RoblesS.GatignolP.CapelleL.MitchellM.-C.DuffauH. (2005). The role of dominant striatum in language: A study using intraoperative electrical stimulations. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 76, 940–946.
28.
GollY.AtlanG.CitriA. (2015). Attention: The claustrum. Trends in Neurosciences, 38(8), 486–495.
29.
GrabskiK.LamalleL.VilainC.SchwartzJ. L.ValléeN.TroprèsI.SatoM. (2012). Functional MRI assessment of orofacial articulators: Neural correlates of lip, jaw, larynx, and tongue movements. Human Brain Mapping, 33(10), 2306–2321.
30.
GrasbyK.TalkA. (2013). The anterior claustrum and spatial reversal learning in rats. Brain Research, 1499, 43–52.
31.
JacksonJ.KarnaniM. M.ZemelmanB. V.BurdakovD.LeeA. K. (2018). Inhibitory control of prefrontal cortex by the claustrum. Neuron, 99(5), 1029–1039.
32.
JacksonJ.SmithJ. B.LeeA. K. (2020). The anatomy and physiology of claustrum-cortex interactions. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 43, 231–247.
33.
KapakinS. (2011). The claustrum: Three-dimensional reconstruction, photorealistic imaging, and stereotactic approach. Folia Morphologica, 70(4), 228–234.
34.
KimJ.MatneyC. J.RothR. H.BrownS. P. (2016). Synaptic organization of the neuronal circuits of the claustrum. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(3), 773–784.
35.
KleinD.ZatorreR. J.MilnerB.MeyerE.EvansA. C. (1994). Left putaminal activation when speaking a second language: Evidence from PET. Neuroreport, 5, 2295–2297.
36.
KohlerK. (1979). Dimensions in the perception of Fortis and Lenis plosives. Phonetica, 36, 332–343.
37.
KrimmelS. R.WhiteM. G.PanickerM. H.BarretF. S.MathurB. N.SeminowiczD. A. (2019). Resting state functional connectivity and cognitive task-related activation of the human claustrum. NeuroImage, 196, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.075
38.
LeveltW. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.
39.
LeveltW. J. M.RoelofsA.MeyerA. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.
40.
LiebermanM. D.CunninghamW. A. (2009). Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: Re-balancing the scale. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(4), 423–428.
41.
LiskerL. (1978). Rapid vs. rabid: A catalogue of acoustic features that may cue the distinction (Status report on speech research SR-54). Haskins Laboratories.
MiklM.MarecekR.HlustíkP.PavlicováM.DrastichA.ChlebusP.BrázdilM.KrupaP. (2008). Effects of spatial smoothing on fMRI group inferences. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 26(4), 490–503.
44.
MilardiD.BramantiP.MilazzoC.FinocchioG.ArrigoA.SantoroG.TrimarchiF.QuartaroneA.AnastasiG.GaetaM. (2013). Cortical and subcortical connections of the human claustrum revealed in vivo by constrained spherical deconvolution tractography. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 406–414. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht231
45.
MokL. W.ThomasK. M.LunguO. V.OvermierJ. B. (2009). Neural correlates of cue-unique outcome expectations under differential outcomes training: An fMRI study. Brain Research, 1265, 111–127.
46.
MonchiO.PetridesM.StrafellaA. P.WorsleyK. J.DoyonJ. (2006). Functional role of the basal ganglia in the planning and execution of actions. Annals of Neurology, 59, 257–264.
47.
MunhallK. G. (2001). Functional imaging during speech production. Acta Psychologica, 107, 95–117.
48.
NaghaviH.ErikssonJ.LarssonA.NybergL. (2007). The claustrum/insula region integrates conceptually related sounds and pictures. Neuroscience Letters, 442(1), 77–80.
49.
NielsenF. A.HansenL. K. (2000, April27–28). Experience with Matlab and VRML [Conference session]. In: Functional Neuroimaging Visualisations, VDE 2000, Princeton, NJ, United States.
50.
NielsenF. A.HansenL. K. (2002). Modelling of activation data in the BrainMap™ database: Detection of outliers. Human Brain Mapping, 15, 146–156.
51.
OberhuberM.JonesO. P.HopeT. M. H.PrejawaS.SeghierM. L.GreenD. W.PriceC. J. (2013). Functionally distinct contributions of the anterior and posterior putamen during sublexical and lexical reading. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 787. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00787
52.
OhA.DuerdenE. G.PangE. P. (2014). The role of the insula in speech and language processing. Brain and Language, 135, 96–103.
53.
ParkS.TyszkaJ. M.AllmanJ. M. (2012). The claustrum and insula in Microcebus murinus: A high resolution diffusion imaging study. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, 6, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2012.00021
54.
PatzkeN.InnocentiG. M.MangerP. R. (2014). The claustrum of the ferret: Afferent and efferent connections to lower and higher order visual cortical areas. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, Article 31. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00031
55.
PironeA.CozziB.EdelsteinL.PeruffoA.LenziCQuiliciF.AntoniniR.CastagnaM. (2012). Topography of Gng2- and NetrinG2-expression suggests an insular origin of the human claustrum. PLOS ONE, 7(9), Article e44745. https://doi.org/10.1371journal.pone.0044745
56.
PützerM.MoringlaneJ. R.SikosL.ReithW.KrickC. M. (2019). fMRI and acoustic analyses reveal neural correlates of gestural complexity and articulatory effort within bilateral inferior frontal gyrus during speech production. Neuropsychologia, 132, Article 107129.
57.
RieckerA.AckermannH.WildgruberD.DogilG.GroddW. (2000). Opposite hemispheric lateralization effects during speaking and singing at motor cortex, insula and cerebellum. Neuroreport, 11, 1997–2000.
58.
RieckerA.MathiakK.WildgruberD.ErbM.HertrichI.GroddW.AckermannH. (2005). fMRI reveals two distinct cerebral networks subserving speech motor control. Neurology, 64, 700–706.
59.
ShusterL. I.LemieuxS. K. (2005). An fMRI investigation of covertly and overtly produced mono- and multisyllabic words. Brain and Language, 93, 20–31.
60.
SmythiesJ. R.EdelsteinL. R.RamachandranV. S. (2012). Hypotheses relating to the function of the claustrum. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6, Article 53. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.-2012.00053
61.
Tanné-GariépyJ.BoussaoudD.RouillerE. M. (2002). Projections of the claustrum to the primary motor, premotor, and prefrontal cortices in the macaque monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 454, 140–157.
62.
TianX.ZarateJ. M.PoeppelD. (2016). Mental imagery of speech implicates two mechanisms of perceptual reactivation. Cortex, 77, 1–12.
63.
TorgersonC. M.IrimaA.GohM. S. Y.Van HornJ. D. (2015). The DTI connectivity of the human claustrum. Human Brain Mapping, 36(3), 827–838.
64.
TorgersonC. M.Van HornJ. D. (2014). A case study in connectomics: The history, mapping, and connectivity of the claustrum. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 8, Article 83. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2014.00083
65.
VigneauM.BeaucousinV.HerveP. Y.JobardG.PetitL.CrivelloF.Tzourio-MazoyerN. (2011). What is right-hemisphere contribution to phonological, lexico-semantic, and sentence processing? Insights from a meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 54(1), 577–593.
66.
Viñas-GuaschN.WuY. J. (2017). The role of the putamen in language: A meta-analytic connectivity modeling study. Brain Structure and Function, 222, 3991–4004.
67.
WiseR. J. S.GreeneJ.BüchelC.ScottS. K. (1999). Brain regions involved in articulation. The Lancet, 353, 1057–1061.
68.
WoolnoughO.ForsethK. J.RolloP. S.TandonN. (2019). Uncovering the functional anatomy of the human insula during speech. eLife, 8, e53086. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53086
