How do speakers think and feel about neologisms? And how do these thoughts and feelings affect speakers’ desire to use a neologism? In the present work, we synthesized existing literature on speakers’ intrapersonal reasons for neologism use. From this synthesis, we derived a model of speaker attitudes about neologisms consisting of three core factors—efficiency, extravagance, and extralinguistic relevance. In three studies, we then empirically assessed whether this model accurately reflected how speakers thought and felt about neologisms, as well as how these thoughts and feelings affected whether speakers wanted to use a neologism. Results indicated that our conceptual model reasonably captured the various types of feelings people have about neologisms and confirmed that each of these types of feelings can be relevant to neologism use.
BrownT. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guildford Publications.
5.
BrucknerA. (2020). Current trends in business communications: Anglicisms in German. Linguaculture, 1, 23–29.
6.
BybeeJ. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82, 711–733.
7.
CalliesM. (2016). Of soundscapes, talkathons and shopaholics: On the status of a new type of formative in English (and beyond). STUF—Language Typology and Universals, 69(4), 495–516.
8.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic.
9.
CrystalD. (1995). The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language. Cambridge University Press.
10.
CrystalD. (1998). Language play. Penguin.
11.
DowningP. (1977). On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language, 53, 810–842.
12.
FazioR. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 75–109.
13.
FischerR. (1998). Lexical change in present-day English. A corpus based study of motivation, institutionalisation, and productivity of creative neologisms. Narr.
14.
HaspelmathM. (1999). Why is grammaticalization irreversible?Linguistics, 37, 1043–1068.
15.
HenrichJ.HeineS.NoranzayanA. (2010) The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Science, 33(2–3), 61–83.
16.
HohenhausP. (1996). Ad-hoc Wortbildung. Terminologie, Typologie und Theorie kreativer Wortbildung im Englischen. Peter Lang Verlag.
17.
HohenhausP. (2005). Lexicalisation and institutionalisation. In ŠtekauerP.LieberR. (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (pp. 17–27). Springer.
18.
KellerR. (2014). Sprachwandel. Von der Unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache [Language change. About the invisible hand in language] (4th ed.). Francke.
19.
KemmerS. (2003). Schemas and lexical blends. In CuyckensH.BergT.DirvenR.PantherK.-U. (Eds.), Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden (pp. 69–97). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
20.
KerremansD. (2015). A web of new words: A corpus-based study of the conventionalization of process of English neologisms. Peter Lang Verlag.
21.
KerremansD.ProkićJ.WürschingerQ.SchmidH.-J. (2019). Using data-mining to identify and study patterns in lexical innovation on the web: The NeoCrawler. Pragmatics and Cognition, 25(1), 174–200.
22.
KerremansD.StegmayrS.SchmidH.-J. (2011). The NeoCrawler: Identifying and retrieving neologisms from the Internet and monitoring ongoing change. In AllanK.RobinsonJ. A. (Eds.), Current methods in historical semantics (pp. 59–96). De Gruyter.
23.
KeyesR. (2021). The hidden history of coined words. Oxford University Press.
24.
KjellmerG. (2000). Potential words. Word, 51(51), 2205–2228.
25.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
26.
LemnitzerL. (2011). Making sense of nonce words. In Heidemann AndersenM.JensenJ.N. (Eds.), Sprognaevets Konferenceserie1. (pp. 7–18). Nye Ord.
27.
LinkS. (2021). What makes a neologism a success story? An empirical study of the diffusion of recent English blends and German compounds [Doctoral dissertation, LMU München]. https://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/28760/
28.
LipkaL. (2002). English lexicology. Lexical structure, word semantics, and word-formation. Narr.
29.
LipkaL.HandlS.FalknerW. (2004). Lexicalization and institutionalization. The state of the art in 2004. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 1, 2–19.
30.
MetcalfA. (2002). Predicting new words: The secrets to their success. Houghton Mifflin Company.
31.
OnyskoA. (2007). Anglicisms in German: Borrowing, lexical productivity, and written codeswitching. De Gruyter.
32.
PillerI. (2001). Identity constructions in multilingual advertising. Language in Society, 30(2), 153–186.
33.
SchmidH.-J. (2008). New words in the mind: Concept-formation and entrenchment in neologisms. Anglia. Zeitschrift für Englische Philologie, 126(1), 1–36.
34.
SchmidH.-J. (2020). The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford University Press.
35.
TrusloveK. (2020). The relationship between English and German in Germany: A sociolinguistic study of the use of English and anglicisms, and attitudes towards them [Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford]. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:49848e7a-fd38-41f9-9eeb-074b0084372f
36.
ZaeffererD. (2021). Are new words predictable? A pilot study on the origin of neologies by means of natural selection. In MauriC.FiorentiniI.GoriaE. (Eds.), Building categories in interaction: Linguistic resources at work (pp. 111–154). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
