This study sought to determine if the inhibitory construct of executive function (EF) and self-regulation (SR) contributes unique variance to reading comprehension (RC) beyond word recognition/decoding (WR/D) and language comprehension (LC), and if the contribution differs according to language history. Thirty-two sixth, seventh, and eighth grade students participated in this study. Seventeen students had language difficulties (LD) and fifteen students had typical language histories (LH). Participants were given a battery of RC, LC, WR/D, and inhibition (attentional control and interference) measures. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses and tests for moderation effects were used to explore the contribution of each variable to RC. Inhibition contributed significant variance to RC in addition to the variance accounted for by LC and WR/D in adolescent learners. Inhibition contributed a greater proportion of variance to RC for students with typical LH than for students with LD. Advancing the understanding of the role of inhibition in EF, SR, and RC may support early identification efforts and drive the development of interventions that effectively target RC deficits.
AdolfS.CattsH.LittleT. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include fluency component?Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19(9), 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9024-z
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. SAGE.
3.
AndersonP. (2002). Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood. Child Neuropsychology, 8(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1076/chin.8.2.71.8724
4.
ArringtonC. N.KuleszP. A.FrancisD. J.FletcherJ. M.BarnesM. A. (2014). The contribution of attentional control and working memory to reading comprehension and decoding. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(5), 325–346.
5.
BishopD.AdamsC. (1990). A prospective study of the relationship between specific language impairment, phonological disorders, and reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 1027–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1990.tb00844.x
6.
BorellaE.CarrettiB.PelegrinaS. (2010). The specific role of inhibition in reading comprehension in good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(6), 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219410371676
7.
BrownA. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In SpiroR.BruceB.BrewerW. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 453–481). Erlbaum.
8.
BryneB.Fielding-BarnsleyR. (1995). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 2- and 3-year follow-up and a new preschool trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 488–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.488
9.
ButterfussR.KendeouP. (2018). The role of executive functions in reading comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 801–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9422-6
10.
CarrettiB.BorellaE.CornoldiC.De BeniR. (2009). Role of working memory in explaining the performance of individuals with specific reading comprehension difficulties: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 246–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.002
11.
CarrettiB.CaldarolaN.TencatiC.CornoldiC. (2014). Improving reading comprehension in reading and listening settings: The effect of two training programmes focusing on metacognition and working memory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(2), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12022
12.
CartwrightK. B.LeeS. A.Taboada BarberA.DeWyngaertL. U.LaneA. B.SingletonT. (2020). Contributions of executive function and cognitive intrinsic motivation to university students’ reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(3), 345–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.273
13.
CarverR. (1998). Predicting reading level in grades 1 to 6 from listening level and decoding level: Testing theory relevant to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 10(2), 121–154. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007923124312
14.
CattsH. (1993). The relationship between speech–language impairments and reading disability. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36(5), 948–958. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3605.948
15.
CattsH.KamhiA. (Eds.). (2005). Language and reading disabilities. Pearson Education
16.
CattsH.AdolfS.WeismerS. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Langauge, and Hearing Research, 49(2), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/023)
17.
CattsH.FeyM.TomblinJ.ZangT. (2002). A longitudinal investigation of reading outcomes in children with language impairments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 45(6), 1142–1157. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/093)
18.
CattsH.HoganT.AdolfS. (2005). Developmental changes in reading and reading disabilities. In CattsH.KamhiA. (Eds.), The connections between language and reading disabilities (pp. 25–40). Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publishers.
19.
ChenR.VellutinoF. (1997). Prediction of reading ability: A cross-validation study of the simple view of reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 29(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969709547947
20.
CollinsA.KoechlinE. (2012). Reasoning, learning, and creativity: Frontal lobe function and human decision-making. PLoS Biol, 10(3), e1001293. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001293
ConnersF.OlsonR. (1990). Reading comprehension in dyslexic and normal readers: A component skill analysis. In BalotaG.Flores d’ArcaisG.RaynerK. (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 557–579). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
23.
CuttingL.ScarboroughH. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5
24.
CuttingL. E.MaterekA.ColeC. A.LevineT. M.MahoneE. M. (2009). Effects of fluency, oral language, and executive function on reading comprehension performance. Annals of Dyslexia, 59(1), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-009-0022-0
25.
DencklaM. B. (1996). Biological correlates of learning and attention: what is relevant to learning disability and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder?Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 17(2), 114–119.
DukeN.PearsonP. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In FarstrupA.SamuelsS. (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd Edition, pp. 205–242). International Reading Association.
28.
DunnL. M.DunnL. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. American Guidance Service.
29.
DurkinD. (1993). Teaching them to read (6th Edition). Allyn & Bacon.
30.
EslingerP. J. (1996). Conceptualizing, describing, and measuring components of executive function: A summary. In LyonG. R.KrasnegorN. A. (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pp. 367–395). Paul H Brookes Publishing Co.
FollmerD. J.SperlingR. A. (2016). The mediating role of metacognition in the relationship between executive function and self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(4), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12123
33.
FoormanB. R.PetscherY. (2018). Decomposing the variance in reading comprehension to reveal the unique and common effects of language and decoding. Journal of visualized experiments: JoVE, 140.
34.
FuhsM. W.NesbittK. T.FarranD. C.DongN. (2014). Longitudinal associations between executive functioning and academic skills across content areas. Developmental Psychology, 50(6), 1698–1709. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036633
35.
García-MadrugaJ. A.VilaJ. O.Gómez-VeigaI.DuqueG.ElosúaM. R. (2014). Executive processes, reading comprehension and academic achievement in 3th [sic] grade primary students. Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.07.013
36.
GeorgiouG. K.DasJ. P. (2016). What component of executive functions contributes to normal and impaired reading comprehension in young adults?Research in Developmental Disabilities, 49, 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.12.001
37.
GeorgiouG. K.DasJ. P. (2018). Direct and indirect effects of executive function on reading comprehension in young adults. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12091|
38.
GeorgiouG.DasJ.HaywardD. (2008). Comparing the contribution of two tests of working memory to reading in relation to phonological awareness and rapid naming. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(3), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00373.x
GrafP.UttlB.TuokkoH. (1995). Color-and picture-word Stroop tests: Performance changes in old age. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17(3), 390–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639508405132
41.
GuajardoN. R.CartwrightK. B. (2016). The contribution of theory of mind, counterfactual reasoning, and executive function to pre-readers’ language comprehension and later reading awareness and comprehension in elementary school. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 144, 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.11.004
42.
HammillD.NewcomerP. (2008). Test of language development–Intermediate (4th Edition). Pearson.
43.
HickmanG.BartholomewM.MathwigJ.HeinrichR. (2008). Differential developmental pathways of high school dropouts and graduates. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.102.1.3-14
44.
HoffmanJ. V. (2017). Comprehension is not simple: Considering the persisting dangers in the simple view of reading comprehension. In IsraelS. E.DuffyG. G. (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 57–69). Guilford Press.
45.
HofmannW.SchmeichelB. J.BaddeleyA. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(3), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.006
46.
HoganT.AdlofS.AlonzoC. (2014). On the importance of listening comprehension. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(3), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2014.904441
HuizingaM.DolanC. V.Van der MolenM. W. (2006). Age-related change in executive function: Developmental trends and a latent variable analysis. Neuropsychologia, 44(11), 2017–2036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.010
49.
JacobR.ParkinsonJ. (2015). The potential for school-based interventions that target executive function to improve academic achievement: A review. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 512–552. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314561338
50.
JohnstonT.KirbyJ. (2006). The contribution of naming speed to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 19(4), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4644-2
51.
JoshiR.AaronP. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710050084428
52.
KarlsenB.GardnerE. F. (1995). Stanford diagnostic reading test. Harcourt/Brace.
53.
KhaliqZ. (2014). iStroop Test (Version 1:1). Mobile Application Software.
54.
KiefferM. J.VukovicR. K.BerryD. (2013). Roles of attention shifting and inhibitory control in fourth-grade reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.54
LatzmanR. D.MarkonK. E. (2010). The factor structure and age-related factorial invariance of the Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS). Assessment, 17(2), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191109356254
57.
LatzmanR. D.ElkovitchN.YoungJ.ClarkL. A. (2010). The contribution of executive functioning to academic achievement among male adolescents. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32(5), 455–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390903164363
58.
LocascioG.MahoneE. M.EasonS. H.CuttingL. E. (2010). Executive dysfunction among children with reading comprehension deficits. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(5), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409355476
59.
LoniganC. J.BurgessS. R.SchatschneiderC. (2018). Examining the simple view of reading with elementary school children: Still simple after all these years. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518764833
60.
LuntL.BramhamJ.MorrisR. G.BullockP. R.SelwayR. P.XenitidisK.DavidA. S. (2012). Prefrontal cortex dysfunction and ‘Jumping to Conclusions’: Bias or deficit?. Journal of Neuropsychology, 6(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-6653.2011.02005.x
MalekA.HekmatiI.AmiriS.PirzadehJ.GholizadehH. (2013). The standardization of Victoria Stroop color-word test among Iranian bilingual adolescents. Archives of Iranian Medicine, 16(7), 380–384. http://www.ams.ac.ir/AIM/NEWPUB/13/16/7/004.pdf
63.
MillerA. C.KeenanJ. M.BetjemannR. S.WillcuttE. G.PenningtonB. F.OlsonR. K. (2013). Reading comprehension in children with ADHD: Cognitive underpinnings of the centrality deficit. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(3), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9686-8
64.
MischelW.AydukO.BermanM. G.CaseyB. J.GotlibI. H.JonidesJ.KrossETeslovichT.WilsonN. L.ZayasVShodaY. (2011). ‘Willpower’over the life span: decomposing self-regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(2), 252–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq081
65.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458
66.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P.EmersonM. J.WitzkiA. H.HowerterA.WagerT. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
67.
MoffittT. E.ArseneaultL.BelskyD.DicksonN.HancoxR. J.HarringtonH.HoutsR.PoultonR.RobertsB. W.RossS.SearsM. R.ThomsonW. M.CaspiA. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(7), 2693–2698. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010076108
68.
MunakataY.HerdS. A.ChathamC. H.DepueB. E.BanichM. T.O’ReillyR. C. (2011). A unified framework for inhibitory control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(10), 453–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.07.011
69.
NationK.CockseyJ.TaylorJ. S.BishopD. (2010). A longitudinal investigation of early reading and language skills in children with poor reading comprehension. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(9), 1031–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02254.x
70.
NessM. K. (2009). Reading comprehension strategies in secondary content area classrooms: Teacher use of and attitudes towards reading comprehension instruction. Reading Horizons, 49(2), 143–166. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol49/iss2/5
71.
NewcomerP. L.HammillD. D. (2009). PLOS: Pragmatic Language Observation Scale. Hammill Institute on Disabilities.
72.
NunesT.BryantP.BarrosR. (2012). The development of word recognition and its significance for comprehension and fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 959–973. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027412
73.
NippoldM. A. (2017). Reading comprehension deficits in adolescents: Addressing underlying language abilities. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48(2), 125–131.
74.
PelegrinaS.CapodieciA.CarrettiB.CornoldiC. (2015). Magnitude representation and working memory updating in children with arithmetic and reading comprehension disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(6), 658–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414527480
75.
PerfettiC. (1999). Comprehending written language: A blueprint of the reader. In BrownC.HagoortP. (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 167–208). Oxford University Press .
76.
PerfettiC.LandiN.OakhillJ. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In SnowlingM. J.HulmeC. (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Blackwell Publishing.
77.
QuinnJ. M.WagnerR. K. (2018). Using meta-analytic structural equation modeling to study developmental change in relations between language and literacy. Child Development, 89(6), 1956–1969. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13049
78.
SavageR. (2001). The ‘simple view’ of reading: Some evidence and possible implications. Educational Psychology in Practice, 17(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667360120039951
SesmaH. W.MahoneE. M.LevineT.EasonS. H.CuttingL. E. (2009). The contribution of executive skills to reading comprehension. Child Neuropsychology, 15(3), 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040802220029
81.
SnowlingM.BishopD.StothardS. (2000). Is preschool language impairment a risk factor for dyslexia in adolescence?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(5), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00651
StorchS.WhitehurstG. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38(6), 934–947. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.934
84.
StroopJ. (1935). Studies of interfernce in serial verbal reaction. Journal of Experiemental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651
85.
SwansonH. L.JermanO. (2007). The influence of working memory on reading growth in subgroups of children with reading disabilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96(4), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2006.12.004
86.
SweetA.SnowC. (Eds). (2003). Rethinking reading comprehension: Solving problems in teaching literacy. Guilford Publications, Inc.
87.
WechslerD. (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children–Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). The Psychological Corporation.
88.
WelshM. C.FriedmanS. L.SpiekerS. J. (2006). Executive functions in developing children: Current conceptualizations and questions for the future. In McCartneyK.PhillipsD. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of early childhood development (pp. 167–187). Blackwell Publishing.
89.
WelshM. C.PenningtonB. F.GroisserD. B. (1991). A normative-developmental study of executive function: A window on prefrontal function in children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 7(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565649109540483
YeniadN.MaldaM.MesmanJ.Van IJzendoornM. H.PieperS. (2013). Shifting ability predicts math and reading performance in children: A meta-analytical study. Learning and Individual Differences, 23(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.004
