Nonliteral language represents a complex form of communication that can be interpreted in numerous different ways. Our study explored how individual differences in personality and communication styles affect the evaluation of literal and nonliteral language in the context of assumptions made by the Tinge Hypothesis (Dews & Winner, 1995). Participants watched videos of social interactions focusing on positive, negative, sarcastic, and jocular statements. They evaluated speaker intentions and social impressions and completed several personality and communication style questionnaires. Individual differences in empathy, defense style, and sarcasm use correlated with the accuracy of identifying speaker intent. Additionally, positive statements were rated as friendlier when compared to jocular statements, thereby supporting the Tinge Hypothesis. However, literal negative statements were rated as more friendly than sarcastic statements, which is inconsistent with the Tinge Hypothesis. The current results provide novel evidence for the Tinge Hypothesis using multimodal, dynamic stimuli and highlight the role of the individual personality of the recipient in evaluating sarcasm and jocularity.
AndrewsG.SinghM.BondM. (1993). DSQ 40 scale. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 181(4), 246–256.
2.
AttardoS.EisterholdJ.HayJ.PoggiI. (2003). Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm. Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 16(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2003.012
BurgoonJ. K.BlairJ. P.StromR. E. (2008). Cognitive biases and nonverbal cue availability in detecting deception. Human Communication Research, 34, 572–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00333.x
ChampelyS.EkstromC.DalgaardP.GillJ.WeibelzahlS.AnandkumarA.FordC.VolcicR.De RosarioH. (2020). pwr: Basic functions for power analysis (Version 1.3-0) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://github.com/heliosdrm/pwr
9.
ColstonH. L. (1997). Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism. Discourse Processes, 23(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709544980
DewsS.WinnerE.KaplanJ.RosenblattE.HuntM.LimK.McGovernAQualterA.SmarshB. (1996). Children’s understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony. Child Development, 67(6), 3071–3085. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01903.x
12.
DressM. L.KreuzR. J.LinkK. E.CaucciG. M. (2008). Regional variation in the use of sarcasm. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X07309512
GibbsR. W. (2002). A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and what is implicated. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(4), 457–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(01)00046-7
17.
GilesR. M.RothermichK.PellM. D. (2019). Differences in the evaluation of prosocial lies: A Cross-cultural study of Canadian, Chinese, and German adults. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00038
18.
GioraR. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(3), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183
19.
GioraR.FeinO.LaadanD.WolfsonJ.ZeitunyM.KidronR.KaufmanR.ShahamR. (2007). Expecting irony: Context versus salience-based effects. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(2), 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480701235346
20.
GriceH. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In ColeP.MorganJ. L. (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Arts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
21.
HarrisM.PexmanP. (2003). Children’s perceptions of the social functions of verbal irony. Discourse Processes, 6950(March 2014), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3603
22.
HoltgravesT.HoltgravesT. (1997). Styles of language use: Individual and cultural variability in conversational indirectness styles of language use, 624–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.624
23.
HonanC. A.McDonaldS.SufaniC.HineD. W.KumforF. (2016). The awareness of social inference test: Development of a shortened version for use in adults with acquired brain injury. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2015.1136691
24.
IvankoS. L.PexmanP. M.OlineckK. M. (2004). How sarcastic are you? Individual differences and verbal irony. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(3), 244–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X04266809
25.
JakobsonL. S.PearsonP. M.KozubZ.HareC.RigbyS. N. (2018). Links between traits associated with the broad autism phenotype and empathy and young adults’ ability to decode speaker intentionality. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 50, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.03.001
26.
KatzA. N. (2005). Discourse and social-cultural factors in understanding non literal language. In ColstonH.KatzA. (Eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences (pp. 183–208). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27.
KeltnerD.YoungR. C.HeereyE. A.OemigC.MonarchN. D. (1998). Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1231–1247. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1231
28.
KieckhäferC.FelsenheimerA. K.RappA. M. (2019). A new test for irony detection: The influence of schizotypal, borderline, and autistic personality traits. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10(Feb), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00028
29.
KnyazevG.MerkulovaE.SavostyanovA.SaprigynA.BocharovA. (2019). Personality and EEG correlates of reactive social behavior. Neuropsychologia, 124(January), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.006
30.
KreuzR. J.GlucksbergS. (1989). How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(4), 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.118.4.374
31.
KrishnanA.HuntD. S. (2019). TTYL :-) . . . Nonverbal cues and perceptions of personality and homophily in synchronous mediated communication. Information Communication and Society, 24(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1635183
32.
LippaR. (1998). Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the people-things dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 996–1009. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.996
33.
MarkeyP. M.WellsS. M. (2002). Interpersonal perception in internet chat rooms. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(2), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2002.2340
34.
MatthewsJ. K.HancockJ. T.DunhamJ. (2010). The roles of politeness and humor in the asymmetry of affect in verbal irony, (February 2015), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp4101
35.
McCornackS. A.ParksM. R. (1986). Deception detection and relationship development: The other side of trust. In McLaughlinM. L. (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 9 (pp. 377–389). Sage.
36.
McDonaldS.BornhofenC.ShumD.LongE.SaundersC.NeulingerK. (2006). Reliability and validity of The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT): A clinical test of social perception. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(24), 1529–1542. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600646185
37.
MilanowiczA.TarnowskiA.BokusB. (2017). When sugar-coated words taste dry: The relationship between gender, anxiety, and response to irony. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(2215), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02215
38.
NicholsonA.WhalenJ. M.PexmanP. M. (2013). Children’s processing of emotion in ironic language. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 691.
39.
O’SullivanM.EkmanP.FriesenW.SchererK. (1985). What you say and how you say it: The contribution of speech content and voice quality to judgments of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 54–62.
40.
PexmanP. M.FerrettiT. R.KatzA. N. (2000). Discourse factors that influence online reading of metaphor and irony. Discourse Processes, 29(3), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950dp2903
41.
PexmanP. M.OlineckK. M. (2002). Does sarcasm always sting? Investigating the impact of ironic insults and ironic compliments. Discourse Processes, 33(3), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3303
42.
PexmanP.RegginL.LeeK. (2019). Addressing the challenge of verbal irony: Getting serious about sarcasm training. Languages, 4(2), 23.
PexmanP. M. (2008). It’s fascinating research: The cognition of verbal irony. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(4), 286-290.
45.
PickeringB.ThompsonD.FilikR. (2018). Examining the emotional impact of sarcasm using a virtual environment. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(3), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1481261
46.
PolkJ.YoungD. G.HolbertR. L. (2009). Humor complexity and political influence: An elaboration likelihood approach to the effects of humor type in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 17(4), 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870903210055
47.
RichterD.KunzmannU. (2011). Age differences in three facets of empathy: Performance-based evidence. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021138
RockwellP. (2000). Lower, slower, louder : Vocal cues of sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(5), 483–495.
50.
RockwellP. (2003). Empathy and the expression and recognition of sarcasm by close relations or strangers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97(1), 251–256.
51.
RothermichK.CaivanoO.KnollL. J.TalwarV. (2020). Do they really mean it? Children’s inference of speaker intentions and the role of age and gender. Language and Speech, 63(4), 689–712.
52.
RothermichK.GiorioC.FalkinsS.LeonardL.RobertsA. (2021a). Nonliteral language processing across the lifespan. Acta Psychologica, 212, 103213.
SavilahtiE. M.HaravuoriH.Rytilä-ManninenM.LindbergN.KettunenK.MarttunenM. (2018). High Beck Depression Inventory 21 scores in adolescents without depression are associated with negative self-image and immature defense style. Psychiatry Research, 263, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.02.040
55.
ScammellJ. L. (2019). Emotion regulation and social competence in middle childhood: The role of parental emotional competence, personality, and emotion socialization beliefs, attitudes, and practices. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/7735
56.
SeckmanM. A.CouchC. J. (1989). Jocularity, sarcasm, and relationships: An empirical study. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 18(3), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124189018003004
57.
Shany-UrT.PoorzandP.GrossmanS. N.GrowdonM. E.JangJ. Y.KetelleR. S.MillerB. L.RankinK. P. (2012). Comprehension of insincere communication in neurodegenerative disease: Lies, sarcasm, and theory of mind. Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 48(10), 1329–1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.08.003
58.
SparksA.McDonaldS.LinoB.O’DonnellM.GreenM. J. (2010). Social cognition, empathy and functional outcome in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 122(1–3), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2010.06.011
59.
ThompsonD.MackenzieI. G.LeutholdH.FilikR. (2016). Emotional responses to irony and emoticons in written language: Evidence from EDA and facial EMG. Psychophysiology, 53, 1054–1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12642
60.
TivM.RouillardV.VingronN.WiebeS.TitoneD. (2019). Global second language proficiency predicts self-perceptions of general sarcasm use among bilingual adults. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19865764
61.
TurcanA.FilikR. (2016). An eye-tracking investigation of written sarcasm comprehension: The roles of familiarity and context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 42(12), 1867–1893. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000285.
62.
WhalenJ. M.DoyleA.& PexmanP. M. (2020). Sarcasm between siblings: Children’s use of relationship information in processing ironic remarks. Journal of Pragmatics, 156, 149-159.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
