Syllable-final nasals /n/ and /ŋ/ in Taiwan Mandarin have been reported to be undergoing merging. Perceptual studies have reported that the alleged merging is context-sensitive and the merging directions are vowel-dependent. These findings have been mostly attributed to dialectal and social factors. The current study uses ultrasonography to capture postures of the entire tongue during the production of syllable-final nasals. The results, though confirming previous findings that the merging directions of syllable-final nasals are vowel-dependent, are best accounted for by the biomechanics of the tongue, as supported by computational 3D model simulations. Furthermore, for some speakers, although nasals were merged in terms of tongue posture, the degrees of nasalization of the preceding vowel were contrastive, suggesting that the merging process may be incomplete.
BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
2.
BoersmaP.WeeninkD. (2017). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0.26).
3.
CarignanC. (2018). Using ultrasound and nasalance to separate oral and nasal contributions to formant frequencies of nasalized vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 143(5), 2588–2601.
4.
ChangY.-c.HsiehF.-f. (2018). Variation in responses to conflicting articulatory targets in the Mandarin VN rimes. LabPhon16, University of Lisbon.
5.
ChangY.-c.HsiehF.-f.OuK.-y.HsiehY.-l. (2016). An aerodynamic study of the nasals and nasalization in Taiwanese Mandarin. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, 46(4), 631–635.
6.
ChenC.-Y. (1991). The nasal endings and retroflexed initials in Peking Mandarin: Instability and the trend of changes. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 19(2), 139–171.
7.
ChenM. Y. (1997). Acoustic correlates of English and French nasalized vowels. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 102, 2360–2370.
8.
ChenM. Y. (2000). Acoustic analysis of simple vowels preceding a nasal in Standard Chinese. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 43–67.
9.
ChoT.KimD.KimS. (2017). Prosodically conditioned fine-tuning of coarticulatory vowel nasalization in English. Journal of Phonetics, 64, 71–89.
10.
ChuangC.-T. (2017). Revisiting Nasal Coda Merger in Taiwan Mandarin: A Corpus Study. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 43(2), 1–27.
11.
DavidsonL. (2006). Comparing tongue shapes from ultrasound imaging using smoothing spline analysis of variance. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(1), 407–415.
12.
DerrickD.StavnessI.GickB. (2015). Three speech sounds, one motor action: Evidence for speech-motor disparity from English flap production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(3), 1493–1502.
13.
DuanmuS. (2007). The Phonology of Standard Chinese. Oxford University Press.
14.
FonJ.HungJ.-m.HuangY.-H.HsuH.-j. (2011). Dialectal variations on syllable-final nasal mergers in Taiwan Mandarin. Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 273–311.
15.
GickB.ChiuC.WidingE.Roewer-DespresF.MayerC.FelsS.StavnessI. (2019). Quantal biomechanical effects in speech postures of the lips. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia.
16.
GickB.StavnessI.ChiuC. (2013). Coarticulation in a whole event model of speech production. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics ICA2013, Montréal, Canada.
HeyneM.DerrickD. (2015). Using a radial ultrasound probe’s virtual origin to compute midsagittal smoothing splines in polar coordinates. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(6), EL509–EL514.
20.
HeyneM.WangX.DerrickD.DorreenK.WatsonK. (2018). The articulation of/ɹ/in New Zealand English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 1–23.
21.
HombertJ.-M.OhalaJ. J.EwanW. G. (1979). Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language, 55(1), 37–58.
22.
HsiehF.-f.KenstowiczM.MouX. (2009). Mandarin adaptations of coda nasals in English loanwords. In CalabreseA.WetzelsW. L. (Eds.), Loan Phonology (pp. 131–154). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
23.
HsuH.-j.TseJ. K.-P. (2007). Syllable-Final Nasal Mergers in Taiwan Mandarin-Leveled but Puzzling. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 33(1), 1–18.
24.
IngR. O. (1985). Guoyu fayin zai Taiwan: Muqian qushi yu yiban cuowu zhi tantao [Mandarin pronunciation on Taiwan: An analysis of recent trends and errors]. Proceedings of the first international conference on the teaching of Chinese as a second language, Taipei, Taiwan.
25.
KawasakiT. (2009). Nasal-oral contrast and the degree of nasalization in Taiwanese. 文学部紀要 [Hosei University Repository], 59, 15–22.
26.
KimS.KimJ.ChoT. (2018). Prosodic-structural modulation of stop voicing contrast along the VOT continuum in trochaic and iambic words in American English. Journal of Phonetics, 71, 65–80.
27.
KublerC. C. (1985). The influence of Southern Min on the Mandarin of Taiwan. Anthropological Linguistics, 27(2), 156–176.
LabovW. (1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change, 2(2), 205–254.
30.
LabovW. (2011). Principles of linguistic change, volume 3: Cognitive and cultural factors (Vol. 36). John Wiley & Sons.
31.
LaiY.-h. (2009). Acoustic correlates of Mandarin nasal codas and their contribution to perceptual saliency. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 35(2), 143–166.
32.
LinC. C. (2002). Nasal endings of Taiwan Mandarin: Production, perception, and linguistic change. 35th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, Arizona State University.
33.
LinY.-H. (2007). The Sounds of Chinese. Cambridge University Press.
34.
LloydJ. E.StavnessI.FelsS. (2012). ArtiSynth: A fast interactive biomechanical modeling toolkit combining multibody and finite element simulation. In Soft tissue biomechanical modeling for computer assisted surgery (pp. 355–394). Springer.
35.
MaclaganM. A.GordonE.LewisG. (1999). Women and sound change: Conservative and innovative behavior by the same speakers. Language Variation and Change, 11(1), 19–41.
36.
MoisikS. R.GickB. (2017). The quantal larynx: The stable regions of laryngeal biomechanics and implications for speech production. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(3), 540–560.
37.
R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URLhttps://www.R-project.org/
38.
StavnessI.GickB.DerrickD.FelsS. (2012). Biomechanical modeling of English/r/variants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(5), EL355–EL360.
39.
StylerW. (2015). On the acoustical and perceptual features of vowel nasality [Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder].
40.
StylerW. (2017). On the acoustical features of vowel nasality in English and French. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(4), 2469–2482.
41.
ThurgoodG. (2007). Tonogenesis revisited: Revising the model and the analysis. Studies in Tai and Southeast Asian Linguistics, 263–291.
42.
TseJ. K.-P. (1992). Production and perception of syllable final [n] and [ŋ] in Mandarin Chinese: An experimental study. Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 18, 143–156.
43.
TsengS.-C. (2013). Lexical coverage in Taiwan Mandarin conversation. International Journal of Computational Linguistics & Chinese Language Processing, 18(1), 1–18.
44.
WickhamH. (2009). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag.
45.
YangJ. H.-T. (2007). The role of sound change in speech recognition research. Proceedings of the Conference on Computing Linguistics and Speech Processing, Taipei Taiwan.
46.
YeY. (2018). Contextual neutralization of the nasal codas in Taiwanese Mandarin: An EMA study. Master thesis, National Tsing Hua University. Taiwan.
47.
YuehL.-c. (1992). The drift of the velar nasal ending in Taiwan Mandarin: A sociolinguistic survey. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Fu Jen Catholic University.
48.
ZhangJ. (2000). Non-contrastive features and categorical patterning in Chinese diminutive suffixation: Max [F] or Ident [F]?Phonology, 17(3), 427–478.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
