This study investigates the phonological production of 50 heritage speakers of Cantonese aged 5–11 in the USA. They were compared to 12 majority language speaker peers in Hong Kong via ratings from first language adult speakers. Overall, the heritage speakers were rated as less native-like and less comprehensible than the children in Hong Kong, although they received higher scores from raters speaking the same variety of Cantonese (i.e., Guangzhou Cantonese, vs. Hong Kong Cantonese). None of the tested language background factors, including age of testing, had a predictive effect on the heritage speakers’ scores. The results illustrate the divergence and heterogeneity of heritage phonology compared to homeland varieties.
AbercrombieD. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
2.
AhnS.ChangC. B.DeKeyserR.Lee-EllisS. (2017). Age effects in first language attrition: speech perception by Korean-English bilinguals. Language Learning, 67(3), 694–733.
3.
AuT. K.KnightlyL. M.JunS.OhJ. S. (2002). Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science, 13(3), 379–385.
4.
AuT. K.OhJ.KnightlyL.JunS. A.RomoL. (2008). Salvaging a childhood language. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 998–1011.
5.
BarrieM. (2003). Contrast in Cantonese vowels. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 20, 1–19.
6.
BatesD. M.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.
7.
BauerR. S.BenedictP. K. (1997). Modern Cantonese phonology. Berlin, Germany & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
8.
Cantonese Pronunciation Electronic Dictionary Team (Research Institute for the Humanities, Chinese University of Hong Kong (1999). A Chinese Talking Syllabary of the Cantonese Dialect: An Electronic Depository. Retrieved from http://humanum.arts.cuhk.edu.hk/Lexis/Canton2/
9.
ChambersJ. K. (2002). Dynamics of dialect convergence. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6, 117–130.
10.
ChanA. Y. W.LiS. C. S. (2000). English and Cantonese phonology in contrast: Explaining Cantonese ESL learners’ English pronunciation problems in language. Culture & Curriculum, 13(1), 67–85.
11.
ChangC. B. (2012). Rapid and multifaceted effects of second-language learning on first-language speech production. Journal of Phonetics, 40(2), 249–268.
12.
ChangC. B.YaoY. (2016). Toward an understanding of heritage prosody: Acoustic and perceptual properties of tone produced by heritage, native, and second language speakers of Mandarin. Heritage Language Journal, 13(2), 134–160.
13.
ChangC. B.YaoY.HaynesE. F.RhodesR. (2011). Production of phonetic and phonological contrast by heritage speakers of Mandarin. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(6), 3964–3980.
14.
CheungW. H. Y. (2009). Span of High Tones in Hong Kong English. Proceedings of the 35th BLS Annual Meeting, 1, 72–82.
15.
ChowS. (2002). A phonetic study of the intonation in Hong Kong Cantonese. Unpublished MPhil thesis, City University of Hong Kong.
16.
de LeeuwE.SchmidM.MennenI. (2010). Perception of foreign accent in native speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(1), 33–40.
17.
DeterdingD.WongJ.KirkpatrickA. (2008). The pronunciation of Hong Kong English. English World-Wide, 29(2), 148–175.
18.
DerwingT. M.MunroM. J. (2009). Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 42(4), 476–490.
19.
DingP. S. (2010). Phonological change in Hong Kong Cantonese through language contact with Chinese topolects and English over the past century. In MillarR. M. (Ed.), Marginal dialects: Scotland, Ireland and beyond (pp. 198–218). Aberdeen, UK: Forum for Research on the Languages of Scotland and Ireland.
20.
DuanmuS. (2011). Chinese syllable structure. In Van OostendorpM.EwenC.HumeE.RiceK. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, Volume 5 (pp. 2151–2777). Malden, MA & Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
21.
FlegeJ. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In StrangeW. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.
22.
FlegeJ. E. (1999). Age of learning and second language speech. In BirdsongD. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 101–132). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
FlegeJ. E.FletcherK. L. (1992). Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 9(1), 370–389.
24.
FloresC.RatoA. (2016). Global accent in the Portuguese speech of heritage returnees. Heritage Language Journal, 13(2), 161–183.
25.
FryD. B. (1968). Manual of phonetics. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland Publishing Company.
26.
GodsonL. (2004). Vowel production in the speech of Western Armenian heritage speakers. Heritage Language Journal, 2(1), 44–69.
27.
HashimotoA. O. (1972). Phonology of Cantonese. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
HardingL. (2013). Pronunciation assessment. In ChapelleC. A. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics.
29.
HoppH.SchmidM. S. (2013). Perceived foreign accent in first language attrition and second language acquisition: The impact of age of acquisition and bilingualism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 361–394.
30.
HungT. T. N. (2003). Towards a phonology of Hong Kong English. World Englishes, 19(3), 337–356.
31.
IsaacsT.TrofimovichP. (2012). Deconstructing comprehensibility: Identifying the linguistic influences on listeners’ L2 comprehensibility ratings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 475–505.
32.
JenkinsJ. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language: New models, new norms, new goals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
JenkinsJ. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 23, 83–103.
34.
JusczykP. W.HoustonD. M.NewsomeM. (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology, 39(3–4), 159–207. http://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0716
35.
KanR. T. Y.SchmidM. S. (2019). Development of tonal discrimination in young heritage speakers of Cantonese. Journal of Phonetics, 73, 40–57.
36.
KaoD. (1971). Structure of the syllable in Cantonese. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
37.
KhattabG. (2009). Phonetic accommodation in children’s code-switching. In BullockB. E.ToribioA. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic code-switching (pp. 142–159). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
KhattabG. (2013). Phonetic convergence and divergence strategies in English-Arabic bilingual children. Linguistics, 51, 439–472.
39.
KnightlyL.JunS.OhJ.AuT. (2003). Production benefits of childhood overhearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, 465–474.
40.
KuhlP. K. (1985). Categorization of speech by infants. In MehlerJ.FoxR. (Eds.), Neonate Cognition: Beyond the Blooming Buzzing Confusion (pp. 231–262). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41.
KupischT.AkpinarD.StöhrA. (2013). Gender assignment and gender agreement in adult bilingual and second language speakers of French. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(2), 150–179.
42.
KupischT.BartonD.HailerK.KlaschikE.StangenI.LeinT.van de WeijerJ. (2014a). Foreign accent in adult simultaneous bilinguals. Heritage Language Journal, 11(2), 123–150.
43.
KupischT.LeinT.BartonD.SchröderD. J.StangenI.StoehrA. (2014b). Acquisition outcomes across domains in adult simultaneous bilinguals with French as weaker and stronger language. Journal of French Language Studies, 24(3), 347–376.
44.
LawC. (2006). Tonal characteristics of early English-Cantonese bilinguals. Unpublished MA dissertation, University of Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10722/51744
45.
LefcheckJ. S. (2015). piecewiseSEM: Piecewise structural equation modeling in R for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(5), 573–579.
46.
LeungM. H. B.GoadH. (in prep.). The production of the low-level and low-falling tone merger by heritage Cantonese speakers in Toronto.
47.
Lippi-GreenR. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. New York: Routledge.
48.
MajorR. C. (2007). Identifying a foreign accent in an unfamiliar language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 539–556.
49.
MajorR. C. (2010). First language attrition in foreign accent perception. International Journal of Bilingualism, 14(2), 163–183.
MayerM. (1969). Frog, where are you?New York: Dial Press.
52.
MokP. K. P.WongP. W. (2010). Production of the merging tones in Hong Kong Cantonese: Preliminary data on monosyllables. Proceedings of Speech Prosody, 100986, 1–4.
53.
MontrulS. (2013). How “native” are heritage speakers?Heritage Language Journal, 10(2), 153–177.
54.
MunroM. J.DerwingT. M. (1999). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 49(Special Issue 1), 285–310.
55.
MunroM. J.DerwingT. M. (2011). The foundations of accent and intelligibility in pronunciation research. Language Teaching, 44, 316–327.
56.
OhJ.JunS.-A.KnightlyL.AuT. (2003). Holding on to childhood language memory. Cognition, 86(3), B53–B64.
57.
OuJ. (2012). Tone merger in Guangzhou Cantonese. Unpublished MPhil thesis, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
58.
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/
59.
RaoR. (2015). Manifestations of /bdg/ in heritage speakers of Spanish. Heritage Language Journal, 12(1), 48–74.
60.
RonquestR. E. (2013). An acoustic examination of unstressed vowel reduction in heritage Spanish. In HoweC.BlackwellS. E.QuesadaM. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 15th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 157–171). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
61.
SaadahE. (2011). The production of Arabic vowels by English L2 learners and heritage speakers of Arabic. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
62.
SancierM. L.FowlerC. A. (1997). Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 421–436.
63.
SchmidM. S.HoppH. (2014). Comparing foreign accent in L1 attrition and L2 acquisition: Range and rater effects. Language Testing, 31(3), 367–388.
64.
SmithL.NelsonC. (1985). International intelligibility of English: Directions and resources. World Englishes, 4, 333–342.
65.
SmithU.DaltonC. (2000). Motivational patterns in advanced EFL pronunciation learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 38, 229–246.
66.
SoK. L. C. (2000). Tonal production and perception of Canadian raised Cantonese speakers. Unpublished MA dissertation, Simon Fraser University.
67.
SoraceA. (2004). Native language attrition and developmental instability at the syntax-discourse interface: Data, interpretations and methods. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 143–145.
68.
StangenI.KupischT.LiaA.ErgünP.ZielkeM. (2015). Foreign accent in heritage speakers of Turkish in Germany. In PeukertH. (Ed.), Transfer effects in multilingual language development (pp. 87–108). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
69.
StoehrA.BendersT.Van HellJ. G.FikkertP. (2017). Heritage language exposure impacts voice onset time of Dutch – German simultaneous bilingual preschoolers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
70.
TaylorL.GeranpayehA. (2011). Assessing listening for academic purposes: Defining and operationalising the test construct. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(2), 89–101.
71.
ThompsonI. (1991). Foreign accents revisited: The English pronunciation of Russian immigrants. Language Learning, 41(2), 177–204.
72.
TseH. (2016). Variation and change in Toronto Heritage Cantonese: An analysis of two monophthongs across two generations. Asia Pacific Language Variation, 2(2), 124–156.
73.
UnsworthS. (2013). Assessing the role of current and cumulative exposure in simultaneous bilingual acquisition: The case of Dutch gender. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 86–110.
ValdésG. (2001). Heritage language students: Profiles and possibilities. In Kreeft PeytonJ.RanardD.McGinnisS. (Eds.), Heritage languages in America: Preserving a national resource (pp. 37–77). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
76.
WeeL.-H. (2008). Phonological patterns in the Englishes of Singapore and Hong Kong. Language, 27(3/4), 480–501.
77.
WerkerJ. F.TeesR. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49–63.
78.
WuW. (2006). A comparative analysis of the phonetics of Hong Kong Cantonese and Guangzhou Cantonese. Unpublished MPhil thesis, University of Hong Kong.
79.
Yeni-KomshianG. H.FlegeJ. E.LiuS. (2000). Pronunciation proficiency in the first and second languages of Korean-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(2), 131–149.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
