The speech signal contains potential cues to a wide range of socioindexical variables. The aim of the current study was to investigate how one variable, talker age, might interact with the perception of a theoretically independent variable, regional accent. We investigated this question specifically in the case of Korean: although many studies have reported on phonetic differences among Korean dialects and speakers’ beliefs and attitudes about them, there has been virtually no research on the auditory perception of such variation. Potential acoustic cues to regional accent were measured in read sentence productions from a total of 72 male talkers in their 20s or 50s to 60s from six Korean provinces. Then, in a perception experiment, native listeners from Seoul (n = 21), Gyeongsang (n = 10), and Jeolla (n = 10) listened to the sentences and were asked to identify the talker’s regional origin from among 6 provinces. Listeners’ responses correlated with talker age: young talkers were disproportionately perceived as being from Seoul, and old talkers—even life-long Seoul residents—were disproportionately perceived as being from non-Seoul regions. A follow-up experiment with listeners from Seoul (n = 30) in which talker age was treated as a between-subjects factor showed an attenuated effect, suggesting that the effect of talker age on perceived regional origin may be partially driven by a contrast effect, such that the speech of older talkers is perceived as less standard—and thus coming from a non-Seoul region—when being directly compared with that of younger talkers.
BayardD.WeatherallA.GalloisC.PittamJ. (2001). Pax Americana? Accent attitudinal evaluations in New Zealand, Australia and America. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5, 22–49.
4.
BoughtonZ. (2006). When perception isn’t reality: Accent identification and perceptual dialectology in French. French Language Studies, 16, 277–304.
5.
BradlowA.ClopperC.SmiljanicR.WalterM. A. (2010). A perceptual phonetic similarity space for languages: Evidence from five native language listener groups. Speech Communication, 52, 930–942.
6.
ChaJ. E. (2005). A tentative plan of educating Kyungsang dialect speakers for pronouncing the standard Korean. Eomunnonjip [Journal of The Society of Korean Language and Literature], 51, 105–126.
7.
ChoiE. (2011). Jaeumgundansunhwa yeongu [A study on consonant cluster simplification] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
8.
ChoiJ.-H. (2013). The analysis of regional characteristics of the aging population in Korea. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 16(2), 233–246.
9.
ClopperC. G. (2008). Auditory free classification: Methods and analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 575–581.
10.
ClopperC. G.BradlowA. R. (2008). Perception of dialect variation in noise: Intelligibility and classification. Language and Speech, 51, 175–198.
11.
ClopperC. G.BradlowA. R. (2009). Free classification of American English dialects by native and non-native listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 436–451.
12.
ClopperC. G.PisoniD. B. (2004). Some acoustic cues for the perceptual categorization of American English regional dialects. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 111–140.
13.
ClopperC. G.PisoniD. B. (2007). Free classification of regional dialects of American English. Journal of Phonetics, 35, 421–438.
14.
DerwingT. M.MunroM. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 1–16.
15.
D’OnofrioA. (2015). Persona-based information shapes linguistic perception: Valley girls and California vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19(2), 241–256.
16.
D’OnofrioA. (2018). Personae and phonetic detail in sociolinguistic signs. Language in Society, 1–27.
17.
EckertP. (1989). The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language, Variation and Change, 1, 245–267.
18.
EichhornJ. T.KentR. D.AustinD.VorperianH. K. (2018). Effects of aging on vocal fundamental frequency and vowel formants in men and women. Journal of Voice, 32, 644.e1–644.e9.
19.
EisensteinM. (1982). A study of social variation in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 32, 367–391.
20.
EychenneJ.JangT.-Y. (2015). On the merger of Korean mid front vowels: Phonetic and phonological evidence. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 7, 119–129.
21.
HarringtonJ.PalethorpeS.WatsonC. I. (2007). Age-related changes in fundamental frequency and formants: a longitudinal study of four speakers. In INTERSPEECH2007, 2753–2756.
22.
HayJ.DragerK. (2010). Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics, 48, 865–892.
23.
HayJ.NolanA.DragerK. (2006). From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. The Linguistic Review, 23, 351–379.
24.
HayJ.WarrenP.DragerK. (2006). Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 458–484.
25.
HollidayJ. J. (2012). The acoustic realization of the Korean sibilant fricative contrast in Seoul and Daegu. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 4, 67–74.
26.
HollidayJ. J.KongE. J. (2011). Dialectal variation in the acoustic correlates of Korean stops. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. 878–881.
27.
HyunP. H. (1985). Jejudo bangeonyeongu nongopyeon [Articles on Jeju dialect research]. Seoul: Iuchulpansa.
28.
JangH. (2012). Gugeo eodu jangaeeum-eui eumhyangjeok teukseonggwa jigak danseo [The acoustic properties and perceptual cues of Korean word-initial obstruents] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
29.
JangH.ShinJ. (2007). Gender difference of standard language orientation throughout the monopthongs by 20`s Daegu dialect speakers. Hangugeohak [Korean Linguistics], 36, 289–314.
JeonL.Cukor-AvilaP. (2015). “One country, one language”?: Mapping perceptions of dialects in South Korea. Dialectologia, 14, 17–46.
32.
KangB.-M. (2004). Hangugin-eui bangeon-e daehan taedo-eui chui: Yebijeok josa gyeolgwa [Changes in Koreans’ attitudes toward dialects: Preliminary survey results]. Proceedings of the Summer 2004 Meeting of the Linguistic Society of Korea. 131–142.
33.
KangJ.KongE. J. (2016). Static and dynamic spectral properties of the monophthong vowels in Seoul Korean: Implication on sound change. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 8, 39–47.
34.
KenstowiczK.ChoH.KimJ. (2008). A note on contrasts, mergers, and acquisitions in Kyungsang accent. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 28, 107–122.
35.
KimB.-H. (2014). A study on the Jeju dialect used by Jeju people living in Ikuno-ku, Osaka, Japan. Yeongju-eomun [The Journal of Yeongju Language & Literature], 28, 111–136.
36.
KimS. (2009). A diachronic study on Korean diphthong ‘eui’ (Unpublished master’s thesis). Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
37.
KimT. (1990). Gyeongsangnamdo bangeon-eui dassori chaie ttareun jirijeok bunhwa [Geographic divisions along differences in consonant pronunciation in South Gyeongsang]. Daesindaehak Nonmunjip [Daesin College Papers], 10, 47–99.
38.
KingJ. R. P. (1987). An introduction to Soviet Korean. Language Research, 23, 233–274.
39.
KingJ. R. P. (1992). Archaisms and innovations in Soviet Korean dialects. Language Research, 28, 201–223.
40.
KwakC.-G. (2003). The vowel system of contemporary Korean and direction of change. Journal of Korea Linguistics, 41, 59–91.
41.
LeeB.-W. (1998). Jungbubangeon, Gyeongnambangeon, Jeonnambangeon-eui eogyang-e daehan bigyo yeongu [Comparative research on intonation in the Central, South Gyeongsang, and South Jeolla dialects]. Urimal Yeon-gu [Korean Language Research], 8, 1–62.
42.
LeeC. (1981). Hangugeo-eui pyojuneo mit bangeondeul sai-eui sangho jeopchokgwa taedo [Contact and attitudes between Korean standard language and dialects]. Hangeul, 173, 559–584.
LeeH.ShinW.ShinJ. (2017). A sociophonetic study on high/mid back vowels in Korean. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 9, 39–51.
45.
LeeH.JongmanA. (2012). Effects of tone on the three-way laryngeal distinction in Korean: An acoustic and aerodynamic comparison of the Seoul and South Kyungsang dialects. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 42, 145–169.
46.
LeeH.JongmanA. (2015). Acoustic evidence for diachronic sound change in Korean prosody: A comparative study of the Seoul and South Kyungsang dialects. Journal of Phonetics, 50, 15–33.
47.
LeeH.JongmanA. (2016). A diachronic investigation of the vowels and fricatives in Korean: An acoustic comparison of the Seoul and South Kyungsang dialects. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 46, 157–184.
48.
LeeI.RamseyR. S. (2000). The Korean language. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
49.
LeeK.-M. (1973). Gugeosa Gaeseol [An Introduction to the History of Korean]. Seoul: Minjungseogwan
50.
LeeK.-H. (2002). Seoul bangeongwa Busan bangeon-eui machareum-e daehan eumhyanghakjeok teukseong bigyo [A comparison of the acoustic properties of fricatives in the Seoul and Busan dialects]. Speech Sciences, 9, 223–235.
51.
LeeN.ShinJ.YooD.KimK. (2017). Speech rate in Korean across region, gender, and generation. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 9, 27–39.
52.
LongD.YimY.-C. (2002). “Regional differences in the perception of Korean dialects” in LongD.PrestonD. R. (eds.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology, vol. II (pp. 249–275). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
McGowanK. B. (2015). Social expectation improves speech perception in noise. Language and Speech, 58, 502–521.
55.
MobrandE. (2012). Reverse remittances: Internal migration and rural-to-urban remittances in industrialising South Korea. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38, 389–411.
56.
NamK.OhJ. (2007). The analysis of the reasons and aspects of pronunciation of `ㄺ/ㄼ`. 한국어학 (Korean Linguistics), 42, 123–153.
57.
NiedzielskiN. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 62–85.
58.
OguraS. (1940). The outline of the Korean dialects. Tokyo: Tōyō Bunko.
59.
OhM.YangH. (2013) The production of stops by Seoul and Yanbian Korean Speakers. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 5, 185–193.
60.
PrestonD. R. (1999). “Introduction” in PrestonD. R. (ed.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology (pp. xxiii–xxxix). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
61.
RubinD. L. (1992). Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 33, 511–531.
62.
SchertzJ.KangY.HanS. (2017). Cross-language correspondences in the face of change: Phonetic independence versus convergence in two Korean-Mandarin bilingual communities. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(1), 1–43.
63.
ShinJ.JangH.KimY.KimK. (2015). Developing a Korean standard speech DB. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 7, 139–150.
64.
ShinW. (2015). An acoustic study of the vowels and word-initial obstruents in the Jeju dialect of Korean (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
65.
StephanC. (1997). The unknown Englishes? Testing German students’ ability to identify varieties of English. In SchneiderE. W. (Ed.), Englishes Around the World (pp. 93–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
66.
StrandE. A.JohnsonK. (1996). Gradient and visual speaker normalization in the perception of fricatives. In GibbonD. (Ed.), Natural language processing and speech technology: Results of the 3rd KONVENS conference, Bielefeld, October 1996 (pp. 14–26). Berlin: Mouton.
67.
TanY. Y. (2012). Age as a factor in ethnic identification in Singapore. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33, 569–587.
68.
Van BezooijenR.GooskensC. (1999). Identification of language varieties: The contribution of different linguistic levels. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 31–48.
69.
WalkerM.SzakayA.CoxF. (2019). Can kiwis and koalas as cultural primes induce perceptual bias in Australian English speaking listeners?Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 10: 7, 1–29.
70.
WarrenP.HayJ.ThomasB. (2007). The loci of sound change effects in recognition and perception. Laboratory Phonology, 9, 87–112.
71.
YanQ. (2017). The relationship between label-based and speech-based perceptual evaluations: The case of Enshi Mandarin regional varieties. Journal of Linguistic Geography, 5, 131–150.
72.
YangB. (1996). A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 245–261.
73.
YangC.O’GradyW.YangS. (2017). Toward a linguistically realistic assessment of language vitality: The case of Jejueo. Language Documentation and Conservation, 11, 103–113.
74.
ZhengY.SamuelA. G. (2017). Does seeing an Asian face make speech sound more accented?Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 1841–1859.
