The Use of Vowel Length in Making Voicing Judgments by Native Listeners of English and Spanish: Implications for Rate Normalization

Abstract

Among other characteristics, voiced and voiceless consonants differ in voice onset time (VOT; Lisker & Abramson, 1964). In addition, in English, voiced consonants are typically followed by longer vowels than their unvoiced counterparts (Allen & Miller, 1999). In Spanish, this relationship is less systematic (Zimmerman & Sapon, 1958). In two experiments, we investigated perceptual sensitivities of English and Spanish native speakers to following vowel length (VL) in categorizing syllables that ranged from a prevoiced bilabial stop [ba] to a long-lag bilabial stop [pa]. According to our results, English speakers show sensitivity to following vowels with VLs falling within an English-typical range (Experiment 1), but not when vowels are shorter and in a Spanish-typical range (Experiment 2). Interestingly, Spanish native speakers do not show sensitivity to following VL in either condition. These results suggest that VOT-VL tradeoffs in perception reflect phonological sensitivities of listeners and are not reducible to speech rate compensation.

Keywords

Speech perception speech rate bilingual Spanish English

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramson

A. S.

(1977). Laryngeal timing in consonant distinctions. Phonetica, 34(4), 295–303.

Allen

J. S.

Miller

J. L.

(1999). Effects of syllable-initial voicing and speaking rate on the temporal characteristics of monosyllabic words. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2031–2039.

Barton

M. A.

Lord

F. M.

(1981). An upper asymptote for the three-parameter logistic item-response model. ETS Research Report Series, 1981(1).

Birdsong

(2006). Dominance, proficiency, and second language grammatical processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(1), 46–49.

Birdsong

(2014). Dominance and age in bilingualism. Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 374–392.

Boucher

V. J.

(2002). Timing relations in speech and the identification of voice-onset times: A stable perceptual boundary for voicing categories across speaking rates. Perception and Psychophysics, 64(1), 121–130.

Chen

(1970). Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment. Phonetica, 22(3), 129–159.

de Jong

. (1991). An articulatory study of consonant-induced vowel duration changes in English. Phonetica, 48(1), 1–17.

de Jong

. (2004). Stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus in English: Patterns of variation in vowel duration. Journal of Phonetics, 32(4), 493–516.

10.

Flege

J. E.

Eefting

(1986). Linguistic and developmental effects on the production and perception of stop consonants. Phonetica, 43, 155–171.

11.

Fowler

C. A.

(1980). Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 113–133.

12.

Grabe

Low

E. L.

(2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. Papers in Laboratory Phonology, 7, 515–546.

13.

Hammond

R. M.

(2001). The sounds of Spanish: Analysis and application (with special reference to American English). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

14.

House

A. S.

Fairbanks

(1953). The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25(1), 105–113.

15.

JASP Team (2018). JASP (Version 0.9) [Computer software].

16.

Kessinger

R. H.

Blumstein

S. E.

(1997). Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time in Thai, French, and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 143–168.

17.

Kessinger

R. H.

Blumstein

S. E.

(1998). Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time and vowel production: Some implications for perception studies. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 117–128.

18.

Klatt

D. H.

(1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 1208–1221.

19.

Lee

M. D.

Wagenmakers

E. J.

(2014). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Lisker

(1957). Closure duration and the intervocalic voiced-voiceless distinction in English. Language, 33, 42–49.

21.

Lisker

(1975). Is it VOT or a first-formant transition detector? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 57(6), 1547–1551.

22.

Lisker

(1986). “Voicing” in English: A catalogue of acoustic features in signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees. Language and Speech, 29, 3–11.

23.

Lisker

Abramson

(1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384–422.

24.

Magloire

Green

K. P.

(1999). A cross-language comparison of speaking rate effects on the production of voice onset time in English and Spanish. Phonetica, 56, 158–185.

25.

Mann

V. A.

Repp

B. H.

(1981). Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 548–558.

26.

McMurray

Clayards

M. A.

Tanenhaus

M. K.

Aslin

R. N.

(2008). Tracking the time course of phonetic cue integration during spoken word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 1064–1071.

27.

Miller

J. L.

(1981). Effects of speaking rate on segmental distinctions. In Eimas

P. D.

Miller

J. L.

(Eds.), Perspectives on the study of speech (pp. 39–74). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

28.

Miller

J. L.

Dexter

E. R.

(1988). Effects of speaking rate and lexical status on phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, 14, 369–378.

29.

Miller

J. L.

Volaitis

L. E.

(1989). Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category. Perception and Psychophysics, 46, 505–512.

30.

Nakai

Scobbie

J. M.

(2016). The VOT category boundary in word-initial stops: Counter-evidence against rate normalization in English spontaneous speech. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 7(1), 13.

31.

Newman

R. S.

Sawusch

J. R.

(1996). Perceptual normalization for speaking rate: Effects of temporal distance. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 540–560.

32.

Olmstead

A. J.

Viswanathan

Aivar

M. P.

Manuel

(2013). Comparison of native and non-native phone imitation by English and Spanish speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 475.

33.

Olmstead

A. J.

Viswanathan

Reilly

Aivar

M. P.

(2013). Use of vowel length in voicing categorization by Spanish-English bilinguals. Poster presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society in Toronto, Canada, November.

34.

Port

R. F.

(1977). The influence of tempo on stop closure duration as a cure for voicing and place. Haskins Laboratories: Status Report on Speech Research SR-51, 52, 59–73.

35.

Raphael

L. J.

(2005). Acoustic cues to the perception of segmental phonemes. In Pisoni

Remez

(Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 182–206). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

36.

Remez

R. E.

Dubowski

K. R.

Davids

M. L.

Thomas

E. F.

Paddu

N. U.

Grossman

Y. S.

Moskalenko

(2011). Estimating speech spectra by algorithm and by hand for synthesis from natural models. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130, 2173–2178.

37.

Stoel-Gammon

Buder

(1999). Vowel length, postvocalic voicing and VOT in the speech of two-year olds. In Ohala

J. J.

Hasegawa

Ohala

Granville

Bailey

A. C.

(Eds), Proceedings of the XIVth International Conference of Phonetic Sciences. Berkeley, CA: The Regents of the University of California.

38.

Strange

Weber

Levy

E. S.

Shafiro

Hisagi

Nishi

(2007). Acoustic variability within and across German, French, and American English vowels: Phonetic context effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(2), 1111–1129.

39.

Summerfield

(1981). Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1074–1095.

40.

Toscano

J. C.

McMurray

(2012). Cue integration and context effects in speech: Evidence against speaking rate normalization. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 74(6), 1284–1301.

41.

Toscano

J. C.

McMurray

(2015). The time-course of speaking rate compensation: Effects of sentential rate and vowel length on voicing judgments. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 30, 529–543.

42.

Utman

J. A.

(1998). Effects of local speaking rate context on the perception of voice-onset time in initial stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 1640–1653.

43.

Wayland

S. C.

Miller

J. L.

Volaitis

L. E.

(1994). The influence of sentential speaking rate on the internal structure of phonetic categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(5), 2694–2701.

44.

Viswanathan

Magnuson

J. S.

Fowler

C. A.

(2010). Compensation for coarticulation: Disentangling auditory and gestural theories of perception of coarticulatory effects in speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(4), 1005–1015.

45.

Viswanathan

Magnuson

J. S.

Fowler

C. A.

(2014). Information for coarticulation: Static signal properties or formant dynamics? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(3), 1228.

46.

Zimmerman

S. A.

Sapon

S. M.

(1958). Note on vowel duration seen cross-linguistically. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 152.