The Prosody of Wh -exclamatives and Wh -questions in German: Speech Act Differences,Information Structure,and Sex of Speaker

Abstract

The prosody of non-assertive speech acts other than questions is rather underexplored. Very little is known about the role of information structure in non-assertive speech acts in general. The present study presents two production experiments examining the prosody of string-identical verb-second (experiment 1) and verb-final (experiment 2) wh-exclamatives and wh-questions in German in relation to their status as different speech acts, in relation to their sensitivity to information structure, and in relation to speaker sex. The study shows that the two speech acts are differentiated by many prosodic means, both globally (duration, intonation contour) and locally (accent distribution in the clause-initial and clause-final regions; pitch, duration, intensity on various elements in the clause, especially the subject pronoun and the direct object, which are more prominent in exclamatives, and the verb-second auxiliary, which is more prominent in questions). Exclamatives overall show a very rigid prosodic contour; they typically are realized with an accent on the subject pronoun and on the object and end in a fall. Questions are much more flexible; they are realized as rises or falls, and show a more varied accent structure in the clause-initial and clause-final regions. Both speech acts show information-structural effects of givenness marking, but the effects in exclamatives are remarkably weak. It is proposed that the speech-act marking prosody overrides information-structural effects to some extent. Male and female speakers show differences in their preferred accent patterns for the two speech acts. Some acoustic differences are only reliable for female speakers.

Keywords

exclamative question intonation focus givenness sex of speaker German emotional language

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abels

(2004). Why surprise-predicates do not embed polar interrogatives. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte, 81, 203–221.

Abels

(2005). Remarks on Grimshaw’s clausal typology. In Maier

Bary

Huitink

(Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 9 (pp. 1–15). Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Nijmegen Centre of Semantics.

Altmann

(1993). Satzmodus. In Jacobs

Stechow

W. A.

(Eds.), Syntax: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung (pp. 1006–1029). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.

Bachorowski

J.-A.

Owren

M. J.

(1995). Vocal expression of emotion: Acoustic properties of speech are associated with emotional intensity and context. Psychological Science, 6, 219–224.

Bachorowski

J.-A.

Owren

M. J.

(2008). Vocal expressions of emotion. In Lewis

Haviland-Jones

J. M.

Feldman Barrett

(Eds.), Handbook of emotions: Third edition (pp. 196–210). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.

Banse

Scherer

K. R.

(1996). Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 614–636.

Bänziger

Scherer

K. R

. (2005). The role of intonation in emotional expressions. Speech Commununication, 46, 252–267.

Bates

Bolker

Maechler

Walker

(2013). Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4, R Package lme4. Version 1.1–11. [Computer Program]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org

Batliner

(1988a). Der Exklamativ: Mehr als Aussage oder doch nur mehr oder weniger Aussage? Experimente zur Rolle von Höhe und Position des F0-Gipfels. In Altmann

(Ed.), Intonationsforschungen (pp. 243–271). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

10.

Batliner

(1988b). Produktion und Prädikation. Die Rolle intonatorischer und anderer Merkmale bei der Bestimmung des Satzmodus. In Altmann

(Ed.), Intonationsforschungen (pp. 207–221). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

11.

Batliner

(1988c). Modus und Fokus als Dimensionen einer nonmetrischen multidimensionalen Skalierung. In Altmann

(Ed.), Intonationsforschungen (pp. 223–242). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

12.

Batliner

(1989). Fokus, Modus, und die große Zahl. Zur intonatorischen Induzierung des Fokus im Deutschen. In Altmann

Batliner

Oppenrieder

(Eds.), Zur Intonation von Modus und Fokus im Deutschen (pp. 21–70). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

13.

Baumann

(2006). The intonation of givenness: Evidence from German. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

14.

Baumann

Grice

Steindamm

(2006). Prosodic marking of focus domains: Categorical or gradient? In Hoffmann

Mixdorff

(Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Speech Prosody, Dresden (pp. 301–304). ISCA Archive. Retrieved from http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/sp2006

15.

Baumann

Riester

(2012) Referential and lexical givenness: Semantic, prosodic and cognitive aspects. In Elordieta

Prieto

(Eds.), Prosody and meaning (pp. 119–162). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.

16.

Baumann

Riester

(2013). Coreference, lexical givenness and prosody in German. Lingua, 136, 16–37.

17.

Baumann

Röhr

C. T.

Grice

(2015). Prosodische (De-)Kodierung des Informationsstatus im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 34, 1–42.

18.

Brinckmann

Benzmüller

(1999). The relationship between utterance type and F0 contour in German. Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH’99), Budapest, Hungary, 5–9 September 1999, ISCA Archive. Retrieved from http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/eurospeech_1999.

19.

Beck

(2006). Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 14, 1–56.

20.

Bierwisch

(1966). Regeln für die Intonation deutscher Sätze. In Bierwisch

(Ed.), Untersuchungen über Akzent und Intonation im Deutschen (pp. 99–201). Berlin, Germany: Akademieverlag.

21.

Boersma

Weenink

(2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/

22.

Breen

Fedorenko

Wagner

Gibson

(2010). Acoustic correlates of information structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 1044–1098.

23.

Castroviejo Miró

. (2006). Wh-Exclamatives in Catalan. Doctoral dissertation. University of Barcelona, Spain.

24.

Chen

(2012). Shaping the intonation of wh-questions: Information structure and beyond. In De Ruiter

(Ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (pp. 146–162). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

25.

D’Avis

F.-J.

(2001). Über “w-Exklamativsätze” im Deutschen. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

26.

D’Avis

F.-J.

(2002). On the interpretation of wh-clauses in exclamative environments. Theoretical Linguistics, 28, 5–31.

27.

D’Avis

F.-J.

(2012). On the placement of the main accent in exclamatives. Talk presented at Information Structure in Non-Assertive Speech Acts. Workshop at the 34th Annual Meeting of the German Linguistic Society (DGfS), Frankfurt.

28.

Delfitto

Fiorin

(2014). Exclamatives: Issues of syntax logical form and interpretation. Lingua, 152, 1–20.

29.

Driemel

(2015). Exclamatives and factivity: A new test based on Verum Focus. In Bellamy

Karvovskaya

Kohlberger

Saad

(Eds.), Proceedings of ConSOLE XXIII (pp. 406–442). Leiden, The Netherlands: Leiden University Center of Linguistics.

30.

Elliott

D. E.

(1974). Toward a grammar of exclamatives. Foundations of Language, 11, 231–246.

31.

Féry

(1993). German intonational patterns. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

32.

Féry

Kügler

(2008). Pitch accent scaling on given, new and focused constituents in German. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 680–703.

33.

Grammis . Akzent. Retrieved from https://grammis.ids-mannheim.de/systematische-grammatik/2342

34.

Grimshaw

(1979). Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry, 10, 279–326.

35.

Gussenhoven

(2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

36.

Haan

(2002). Speaking of questions. An exploration of Dutch question intonation. Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT Publications.

37.

Haida

(2007). The Indefiniteness and Focusing of Wh-Words. Doctoral dissertation. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.

38.

Hedberg

Sosa

J. M.

(2002). The prosody of questions in natural discourse. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Speech Prosody Aix-en-Provence, France (pp. 375–378). ISCA Archive. Retrieved from http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/sp2002

39.

Hedberg

Sosa

J. M.

Fadden

(2004). Meanings and configurations of questions in English. In Bel

Marlien

(Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Speech Prosody Nara, Japan (pp. 309–312). ISCA Archive. Retrieved from http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/sp2004

40.

Henton

(1989). Fact and fiction in the description of female and male pitch. Language and Communication, 9, 299–311.

41.

Hermes

D. J.

Van Gestel

J. C.

(1991). The frequency scale of speech intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 97–102.

42.

Isačenko

A. V.

Schädlich

H. J.

(1966). Untersuchungen über die deutsche Satzintonation. In Bierwisch

(Ed.), Untersuchungen über Akzent und Intonation im Deutschen (pp. 7–67). Berlin, Germany: Akademieverlag.

43.

Jacobs

(1988). Fokus-Hintergrund-Gliederung und Grammatik. In Altmann

(Ed.), Intonationsforschungen (pp. 89–134). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

44.

Jacobs

(1991). Implikaturen und “alte Information” in w-Fragen. In Reis

Rosengren

(Eds.), Fragesätze und Fragen (pp. 201–222). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

45.

Kohler

K. J.

(2004). Pragmatic and attitudinal meanings of pitch patterns in German syntactically marked questions. In Fant

Fujisaki

Cao

(Eds.), From traditional phonology to modern speech processing—In honour of Professor Wu Zongji’s 95th birthday (pp. 205–215). Beijing, China: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

46.

Krifka

(2008). Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55, 243–276.

47.

Kügler

(2003). Do we know the answer? Variation in yes-no-question intonation. In Fischer

Van de Vijver

Vogel

(Eds.), Experimental studies in linguistics 1 (pp. 9–29). Potsdam, Germany: Potsdam University Press.

48.

Kügler

Genzel

(2012). On the prosodic expression of pragmatic prominence: The case of pitch register lowering in Akan, Language and Speech, 55, 331–359.

49.

Kügler

Smolibocki

Arnold

Braun

Baumann

Grice

Jannedy

Michalsky

Niebuhr

Peters

Ritter

S. B.

Röhr

C. T.

Schweitzer

Wagner

(2015) DIMA—Annotation guidelines for German intonation. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (paper no. 317). Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow.

50.

Ladd

D. R.

Silverman

Tolkmitt

Bergmann

Scherer

(1985). Evidence for the independent function of intonation contour type, voice quality, and F0 range in signaling speaker affect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 78, 435–444.

51.

Lieberman

Michaels

(1962). Some aspects of fundamental frequency and envelope amplitude as related to the emotional content of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34, 922–927.

52.

Michalsky

(2017). Frageintonation im Deutschen: Zur intonatorischen Markierung von Interrogativität und Fragehaltigkeit. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.

53.

Näf

(1996). Die w-Exklamativsätze im Deutschen—zugleich ein Plädoyer für eine Rehabilitierung der Empirie in der Sprachwissenschaft. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 24(2), 135–152.

54.

Niebuhr

(2012). Das ist (k)eine Frage—Phonetische Merkmale in der Identifikation standarddeutscher Deklarativfragen. In Anderwald

I. L.

(Ed.), Sprachmythen—Fiktion oder Wirklichkeit (pp. 203–222). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.

55.

Niebuhr

Bergherr

Huth

Lill

Neuschulz

(2010). Intonationsfragen hinterfragt: Die Vielschichtigkeit der prosodischen Unterschiede zwischen Aussage- und Fragesätzen mit deklarativer Syntax. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, 77, 304–46.

56.

Oppenrieder

(1988). Intonatorische Kennzeichnung van Satzmodi. In Altmann

(Ed.), Intonationsforschungen (pp. 69–205). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

57.

Peters

(2005). Intonation. In Duden: Die Grammatik (pp. 95–128). Mannheim, Germany: Dudenverlag.

58.

Petrone

Niebuhr

(2014). On the intonation of German intonation questions: The role of the prenuclear region. Language and Speech, 57(1) 108–146.

59.

Pinheiro

Bates

DebRoy

Sarkar

(2013). Package “nlme” version 3.1–108. [Computer program]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org

60.

Repp

(2015). On the acoustics of wh-exclamatives and wh-interrogatives: Effects of information structure and sex of speaker. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (paper no. 319, pp. 1–5). Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow.

61.

Repp

(2016a). Semantic restrictions in verb-second versus non-verb-second wh-exclamatives. Talk presented at workshop, ‘Verb second in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences’ at the 38th Annual Conference of the Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft (DGfS), Konstanz, Germany.

62.

Repp

(2016b). Contrast: Dissecting an elusive information-structural notion and its role in grammar. In Féry

Ishihara

(Eds.), OUP handbook of information structure. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

63.

Repp

Rosin

(2015). The intonation of echo wh-questions. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH 2015), Dresden, Germany, 6–10 September 2015 (pp. 938–942). International Speech Communication Association. ISSN: 1990-9770, ISCA Archive. Retrieved from http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/interspeech_2015

64.

Rett

(2008). Degree Modification in Natural Language. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New Jersey, USA.

65.

Rett

(2011). Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy, 34, 411–442.

66.

Roguska

(2007). Exklamation und Negation. Doctoral dissertation, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Germany.

67.

Rohloff

Michalsky

(2018). Pitch scaling as a question cue in German wh-questions. In Proceedings of Phonetics & Phonology in German-Speaking Countries (P&P 13, pp. 169–172). Berlin, Germany: Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.

68.

Röhr

Baumann

(2010). Prosodic marking of information status in German. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Speech Prosody Chicago (paper no. 19). ISCA Archive. Retrieved from http://www.isca-speech.org/sp2010/ITRW

69.

Rooth

(1985). Association with Focus. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, USA.

70.

Rooth

(1992). A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 75–116.

71.

Rosengren

(1992). Zur Grammatik und Pragmatik der Exklamation. In Rosengren

(Ed.), Satz und Illokution: Volume 1 (pp. 263–306). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

72.

Rosengren

(1997). Expressive sentence types—a contradiction in terms: The case of exclamation. In Swan

Westvik

O. J.

(Eds.), Modality in Germanic languages: Historical and comparative perspectives (pp. 151–184). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

73.

Scherer

K. R.

Banse

Wallbott

H. G.

Goldbeck

(1991). Vocal cues in emotion encoding and decoding. Motivation and Emotion, 15, 123–148.

74.

Schmid

Moosmüller

(2013). Gender differences in the phonetic realization of semantic focus. In Mertens

Simon

A. C.

(Eds.), Proceedings of the Prosody-Discourse Interface Conference 2013 (IDP-2013), Leuven, September 11–13 (pp. 13–19). Retrieved from http://www.arts.kuleuven.be/ling/franitalco/idp2013/proceedings.html

75.

Schneider

Lintfert

(2003). Categorical perception of boundary tones in German. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS-15), Barcelona (pp. 631–634). ICPhS Archive. Retrieved from http://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs/icphs2003.

76.

Scholz

(1991). Wunschsätze im Deutschen—formale und funktionale Beschreibung. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

77.

Selting

(1995). Prosodie im Gespräch: Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie der Konversation. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

78.

Truckenbrodt

(2012). On the prosody of German wh-questions. In Elordieta

Prieto

(Eds.), Prosody and Meaning (pp. 73–118). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.

79.

Uhmann

(1991). Fokusphonologie: Eine Analyse deutscher Intonationskonturen im Rahmen der nicht-linearen Phonologie. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

80.

van Heuven

V. J.

Haan

. (2000). J. Phonetic correlates of statement versus question intonation in Dutch. In Botinis

(Ed.), Intonation. analysis, modelling and technology (pp. 119–144). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

81.

van Heuven

van Zanten

. (2005). Speech rate as a secondary prosodic characteristic of polarity questions in three languages. Speech Communication, 47, 87–99.

82.

von Essen

. (1964). Grundzüge der hochdeutschen Satzintonation. Ratingen, Germany: A. Henn Verlag.

83.

Wochner

Schlegel

Dehé

Braun

(2015). The prosodic marking of rhetorical questions in German. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH 2015) (pp. 938–942). International Speech Communication Association.

84.

(2013). ProsodyPro—A tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis. In Bigi

Hirst

(Eds.), Proceedings of Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody (TRASP), Aix-en-Provence (pp. 7–10). Aix-en-Provence, France: Laboratoire Parole et Langage (LPL). Retrieved from http://www.lpl-aix.fr/~trasp/Proceedings/TRASP2013_proceedings.pdf

85.

Zanuttini

Portner

(2003). Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantic interface. Language, 79, 39–81.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB