Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Abstract underlying representations play a crucial role in capturing predictable relations among different phonetic categories in phonological theory. Tone sandhi is a tonal alternation phenomenon in which a tone changes to a different tone in certain phonological environments. This study investigates whether Taiwanese listeners are more sensitive to the surface form of the tones or the underlying tonal representations of tone sandhi words. An auditory lexical decision experiment was conducted to examine priming effects between monosyllabic primes and disyllabic target words (tone sandhi T51 → T55 and sandhi T24 → T33). Each target was preceded by either a surface-tone prime (e.g., ping55-ping55tsun24; pue33-pue33jong51), an underlying-tone prime (e.g., ping51-ping55tsun24; pue24-pue33jong51), or an unrelated control (e.g., ping21-ping55tsun24; pue21-pue33jong51). Results showed significant differences in the natue of the priming effects across the two sandhi types, with productivity of the tone sandhi rule influencing how listeners’ process and represent tone sandhi words.

Keywords

Priming tone sandhi underlying representation surface representation productivity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bates

Maechler

Bolker

B. M.

Walker

(2014). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.

Chan

M. K. M.

Ren

H.-M.

(1989). Wuxi tone sandhi: from last to first syllable dominance. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 21(2), 35–64.

Cheng

R. L.

(1968). Tone sandhi in Taiwanese. Linguistics, 41(1), 19–42.

Chien

Y.-F.

Sereno

J. A.

Zhang

(2016). Priming the representation of Mandarin tone 3 sandhi words. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 179–189.

Connine

C. M.

Random

Patterson

D. J.

(2008). Processing variant forms in spoken word recognition: The role of variant frequency. Perception and Psychophysics, 70(3), 403–411.

Cutler

Weber

(2007). Listening experience and phonetic-to-lexical mapping in L2. In Trouvain

Barry

W. J.

(Eds.), 16th International Congress of Phonetics Sciences (ICPhS 2007) (pp. 43–48). Dudweiler, Germany: Pirrot.

Flege

J. E.

Takagi

Mann

(1996). Lexical familiarity and English-language experience affect Japanese adults’ perception of /ɹ/ and /l/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99(2), 1161–1173.

Fodor

J. A.

(1983). Modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Goldinger

S. D.

(1996). Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(5), 1166–1183.

10.

Goldinger

S. D.

(1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105(2), 251–279.

11.

Goldinger

S. D.

(2007). A complementary-system approach to abstract and episodic speech perception. In Trouvain

Barry

W. J.

(Eds.), 16th International Congress of Phonetics Sciences (ICPhS 2007) (pp. 49–54). Dudweiler, Germany: Pirrot.

12.

Goldinger

S. D.

Pisoni

D. B.

Logan

J. S.

(1991). On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(1), 152–162.

13.

Kiparsky

(1973). Abstractness, opacity and global rules. In Fujimura

(Ed.), Three dimensions of linguistic theory (pp. 57–86). Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Institute for Advanced Studies of Language.

14.

Kuznetsova

Brockhoff

P. B.

Christensen

R. H. B.

(2015). lmerTest: tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0–20. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html

15.

Lin

J.-W.

(1994). Lexical government and tone group formation in Xiamen Chinese. Phonology, 11(2), 237–275.

16.

Luce

P. A.

Pisoni

D. B.

(1998). Recognition spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19(1), 1–36.

17.

McClelland

J. L.

Elman

J. L.

(1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1–86.

18.

Mullennix

J. W.

Pisoni

D. B.

Martin

C. S.

(1989). Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85(1), 365–378.

19.

Norman

O’Reilly

(2003). Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary learning system approach. Psychological Review, 110(4), 611–646.

20.

Norris

(1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52(3), 289–234.

21.

Schacter

D. L.

(1992). Understanding implicit memory: A cognitive neuroscience approach. American Psychologist, 47(4), 559–569.

22.

Tagliaferri

(2015). Paradigm. Perception Research Systems, Inc. Retrieved from www.perceptionresearchsystems.com

23.

Tsao

F.-F.

Yao

R. S.

(Eds.) (2011). Online Taiwanese dictionary. Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://twblg.dict.edu.tw/holodict_new/default.jsp

24.

Tsay

J. S.

Myers

(2013). Taiwanese spoken corpus. Minxiong Township, Taiwan: Department of Linguistics, National Chung Cheng University.

25.

Weber

Scharenborg

(2012). Models of spoken-word recognition. WIREs Cognitive Science, 3(3), 387–401.

26.

Zhang

Lai

Y.-W.

(2010). Testing the role of phonetic knowledge in Mandarin tone sandhi. Phonology, 27(1), 153–201.

27.

Zhang

Lai

Y.-W.

Sailor

(2011). Modeling Taiwanese speakers’ knowledge of tone sandhi in reduplication. Lingua, 121(2), 181–206.

28.

Zhou

Marslen-Wilson

W. D.

(1997). The abstractness of phonological representation in the Chinese mental lexicon. In Chen

H.-C.

(Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and other Asian Languages (pp. 3–26). Hong Kong, China: Chinese University Press.

What’s in a Word: Observing the Contribution of Underlying and Surface Representations

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References