A perception experiment with native German listeners provided evidence for the relevance of the tonal onglide in nuclear accents – the pitch movement leading towards the target on the accented syllable. Listeners were able to distinguish between two pragmatic meanings of a short phrase (given/non-contrastive and new/contrastive) using the tonal onglide as the sole acoustic cue. On the basis of these findings, we argue that the onglide merits a phonological status in an intonation model of German and should not be regarded as merely phonetic detail.
BatesD. M.MaechlerM.BolkerB. (2012). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999–0.
2.
BeckmanM. E. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent. Netherlands Phonetics Archives, vol. VII. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
3.
BeckmanM. E.HirschbergJ.Shattuck-HufnagelS. (2005). The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In JunS.-A. (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 9–54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BoersmaP. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341–345.
5.
BüringD. (2007). Intonation, semantics and information structure. In RamchandG.ReissC. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces.
6.
ChenA. (2011). What’s in a rise: Evidence for an off-ramp analysis of Dutch intonation. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong, 448–451.
7.
Couper-KuhlenE. (1986). An introduction to English prosody. London and Tuebingen: Edward Arnold and Niemeyer.
8.
CruttendenA. (1997). Intonation (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CrystalD. (1969). Prosodic systems and intonation in English. London: Cambridge University Press.
10.
FéryC. (1993). German intonational patterns. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
GriceM.BaumannS. (2002). Deutsche Intonation und GToBI. Linguistische Berichte, 191, 267–298.
13.
GriceM.BaumannS.BenzmüllerR. (2005). German intonation in Autosegmental-Metrical Phonology. In JunS.-A. (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 55–83). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
GriceM.BaumannS.JagdfeldN. (2009). Tonal association and derived nuclear accents: The case of downstepping contours in German. Lingua, 119, 881–905.
15.
GriceM.SavinoM. (1995). Low tone versus ‘sag’ in Bari Italian intonation: A perceptual experiment. Proceedings of the XIII International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden, 658–661.
16.
GussenhovenC. (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
GussenhovenC. (2005). Transcription of Dutch intonation. In JunS.-A. (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 118–145). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
GussenhovenC. (2008). Semantic judgements as evidence for the intonational structure of Dutch. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Speech Prosody, Campinas, Brazil, 609–612.
19.
LaddD. R. (2008). Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
LaddD. R.MortonR. (1997). The perception of intonational emphasis: Continuous or categorical?Journal of Phonetics, 25, 313–342.
21.
LaddD. R.SchepmanA. (2003). “Sagging transitions” between high pitch accents in English: Experimental evidence. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 81–112.
NiebuhrO.D’ImperioM.Gili FivelaB.CangemiF. (2011). Are there “shapers” and “aligners”? Individual differences in signalling pitch accent category. Proceedings of the 17th ICPhS, Hong Kong, China, 120–123.
24.
PeirceJ. W. (2007). PsychoPy - Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162, 8–13.
25.
PerkellJ. S.GuentherF. H.LaneH.MatthiesM. L.StockmannE.TiedeM.ZandipourM. (2004). The distinctness of speakers’ productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 2338–44.
26.
PetersJ. (2014). Intonation. Heidelberg: Winter.
27.
PhebyJ. (1975). Intonation und Grammatik im Deutschen. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
28.
PierrehumbertJ.BeckmanM. (1988). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.
29.
PikeK. L. (1945). The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
30.
R Core Team (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/.
31.
RitterS.KrügerM.MückeD.GriceM. (2012). Production and perception of contrast: Tonal onglides and oral gestures. Poster presentation at the final symposium of the DFG Priority programme 1234, July 26th.
32.
RöhrC.BaumannS. (2011). Decoding information status by type and position of accent in German. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong, 1706–1709.
33.
RöhrC.BaumannS. (2010). Prosodic marking of information status in German. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Chicago, 100019, 1–4.
34.
SchepmanA.LickleyR.LaddD.R. (2006). Effects of vowel length and “right context” on the alignment of Dutch nuclear accents. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 1–28.
35.
von EssenO. (1964). Grundzüge der hochdeutschen Satzintonation (2nd edition). Ratingen: Henn.
