AlbrightA.HayesB. (2003). Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition, 90, 119–161.
2.
AlegreM.GordonP. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 41–61.
3.
AlishahiA. (2011). Computational modeling of human language acquisition: Synthesis lectures on human language technologies. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
4.
AlishahiA.StevensonS. (2008). A computational model of early argument structure acquisition. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 32, 789–834.
5.
ArnonI.Cohen PrivenU. (2013). More than words: The effect of multi-word frequency and constituency on phonetic duration. Language and Speech, 56(3), 349–372.
6.
ArnonI.SniderN. (2010). More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language,62, 67–82.
7.
AylettM.TurkA. (2006). Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and the spectral characteristics of vocal syllable nuclei. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 3048–3058.
8.
BannardC.LievenE.TomaselloM. (2009). Modeling children’s early grammatical knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 17284–17289.
9.
BannardC.MatthewsD. (2008). Stored word sequences in language learning. Psychological Science, 19, 241–248.
10.
BaayenR. H. (2011) Corpus linguistics and naive discriminative learning. Brazilian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 295–328.
11.
BaayenR. H.DijkstraT.SchreuderR. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94–117.
12.
BaayenR. H.HendrixP.RamscarM. (2013). Sidestepping the combinatorial explosion: An explanation of n-gram frequency effects based on naive discriminative learning. Language and Speech, 56(3), 329–348.
13.
BaayenR. H.MilinP.Filipovic DurdevicD.HendrixP.MarelliM. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 118, 438–482.
14.
BaayenR. H.SchreuderR.De JongN. H.KrottA. (2002) Dutch inflection: The rules that prove the exception. In NooteboomS.WeermanF.WijnenF. (Eds.), Storage and computation in the language faculty (pp. 61–92), Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
15.
BeekhuizenB.BodR.ZuidemaW. (2013). Three design principles of language: The search for parsimony in redundancy. Language and Speech, 56(3), 265–290.
16.
BockK.LeveltW. (2002). Language production: Grammatical encoding. Psycholinguistics: Critical concepts in psychology, 5, 405–452.
17.
BodR.HayJ.JannedyS. (Eds.). (2003). Probabilistic linguistics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
18.
BybeeJ. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
ChaterN.ManningC. D. (2006). Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 335–344.
21.
ChristiansenM. H.ChaterN. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 489–509.
22.
ChomskyN. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
23.
ClarkA.LappinS. (2010). Linguistic nativism and the poverty of the stimulus. Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
24.
DaelemansW.Van den BoschA. (2005). Memory-based language processing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
ElmanL. J.BatesE. A.JohnsonM. H.Karmiloff-SmithA.ParisiD.PlunkettK. (1996). Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
ElmanJ. L. (2011). Lexical knowledge without a mental lexicon?The Mental Lexicon, 60, 1–33.
27.
FineA. B.JaegerT. F.QianT.FarmerT. (submitted). Rapid expectation adaptation during syntactic comprehension. Manuscript submitted for publication.
28.
FrankM. C.GoldwaterS.GriffithsT. L.TenenbaumJ. B. (2010). Modeling human performance in statistical word segmentation. Cognition, 117, 107–125.
29.
GelmanA. (2004). Bayesian data analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press.
30.
GerkenL.WilsonR.LewisW. (2005). Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories. Journal of Child Language, 32, 249–268.
31.
GoldbergA. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32.
GoldsmithJ. (2001). Unsupervised learning of the morphology of a natural language. Computational linguistics, 27, 153-198.
33.
GoldwaterS.GriffithsT.JohnsonM. (2009). A Bayesian framework for word segmentation: Exploring the effects of context. Cognition112, 21–54.
34.
GómezR. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13, 431–436.
35.
GriffithsT. L.ChaterN.KempC.PerforsA.TenenbaumJ. B. (2010). Probabilistic models of cognition: Exploring representations and inductive biases. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 357–364.
36.
HauserM. D.ChomskyN.FitchW. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science, 298, 1569–1579.
37.
HolsingerE. (2013). Representing idioms: Syntactic and contextual effects on idiom processing. Language and Speech, 56(3), 373–394.
38.
JaegerT. F. (2010). Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 23-62.
39.
JaegerT. F.SniderN. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127(1), 57-83.
40.
JaegerT. F.TilyH. (2011). On language ‘utility’: Processing complexity and communicative efficiency. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2, 323–335.
41.
KaschakM. P.GlenbergA. M. (2004). This construction needs learned. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 450-467.
42.
KaschakM. P.KuttaT. J.SchatschneiderC. (2011). Long-term cumulative structural priming persists for (at least) one week. Memory & Cognition, 39, 381–388.
KochC.SegevI. (1989). Methods in neural modeling: From synapses to networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
KonopkaA. E.BockJ. K. (2009). Lexical or syntactic control of sentence formulation? Structural generalizations from idiom production. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 68–101.
46.
LangackerR. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
47.
LangackerR. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
48.
LennebergE. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
49.
LeveltW. J. M. (1993). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50.
LiM.VitányiP. (2008). An introduction to kolmogorov complexity and its applications. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
51.
MacWhinneyB. (1998). Models of the emergence of language. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 199–227.
52.
MacWhinneyB. (2005). The emergence of grammar from perspective. In PecherD.ZwaanR. (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language and thinking (pp. 198–223). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53.
MarcusG. F.VijayanS.Bandi RaoS.VishtonP. M. (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283, 77–80.
54.
MarrD. (1982). Vision. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
55.
McClellandJ. L.BotvinickM. M.NoelleD. C.PlautD. C.RogersT.T.SeidenbergM. S.SmithL. B. (2010). Letting structure emerge: Connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to understanding cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 348–356.
56.
OaksfordM.ChaterN. (2007). Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
57.
O’DonnellT. J. (2011). Productivity and reuse in language (Doctoral dissertation). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
58.
O’DonnellT. J.HauserM. D.FitchW. T. (2005). Using mathematical models of language experimentally. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 284–289.
59.
O’GradyW. (2010). Emergentism. In HoganP. (Ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences (pp. 274–76). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.
PiantadosiS. T.TilyH.GibsonE. (2011). Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 3526–9.
61.
PerforsA.TenenbaumJ. B.RegierT. (2006). Poverty of the stimulus? A rational approach. In SunR.MiyakeN. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 663–668). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
62.
PerforsA.TenenbaumJ. B.RegierT. (2011). The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition, 306–338.
63.
PickeringM. J.GarrodS. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–226.
64.
PinkerS. (1995). The language instinct: The new science of language and mind. London, UK: Penguin.
65.
PollardC.SagI. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
66.
PostM.GildeaD. (2013). Bayesian tree substitution grammars as a usage-based approach. Language and Speech, 56(3), 291–308.
67.
RosenbergS.CoyleP. J.PorterW. L. (1966). Recall of adverbs as a function of the frequency of their adjective roots. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 65–76.
68.
RumelhartD. E.McClellandJ. L., & the PDP Research Group. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69.
PostM.GildeaD. (2009). Bayesian learning of a tree substitution grammar. In Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 conference short papers (pp. 45–48), Suntec, Singapore.
70.
TaborW.TannenhausM. K. (1999). Dynamical systems of sentence processing. Cognitive Science, 23, 491–515.
71.
TaftM. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 7, 263–272.
72.
TenenbaumJ.GriffithsT. (2001). Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 629–640.
73.
TilyH.KupermanV. (2012). Rational phonological lengthening in spoken Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132, 3935–3940.
74.
TomaselloM. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
75.
VallabhaG.McClellandJ.PonsF.WerkerJ.AmanoS. (2007). Unsupervised learning of vowel categories from infant-directed speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 13273–13278.
76.
van den BoschA.DaelemansW. (2013). Implicit schemata and categories in memory-based language processing. Language and Speech, 56(3), 309–328.
77.
WedelA.JacksonS.KaplanA. (2013). Functional load and the lexicon: Evidence that syntactic category and frequency relationships in minimal lemma pairs predict the loss of phoneme contrasts in language change. Language and Speech, 56(3), 395–417.