Three phoneme monitoring experiments examined the manner in which additional processing time influences spoken word recognition. Experiment 1a introduced a version of the phoneme monitoring paradigm in which a silent interval is inserted prior to the word-final target phoneme. Phoneme monitoring reaction time decreased as the silent interval increased indicating that lexical knowledge was utilized more effectively with additional processing time. Experiment 1b used short, medium, and long words and derived nonwords with word-initial mismatching segments. Phoneme monitoring response times to words and nonwords were sensitive to both additional processing time (silent interval delay) and word length. Experiment 2 examined the utilization of anticipatory coarticulation as a function of word length and additional processing time. The results suggest that (segmental and coarticulatory) information subsequent to mismatching information influences spoken word recognition in a manner dependent on word length and availability of additional processing time.
Allopenna, P.D., Magnuson, J.S., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 419-439.
2.
Boelte, J., & Coenen, E. (2002). Is phonological information mapped onto semantic information in a one-to-one manner? Brain and Language, 81, 384-397.
3.
Connine, C.M. (1994). Vertical and horizontal similarity in spoken-word recognition. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Connine, C.M., Blasko, D.G., & Hall, M. (1991). Effects of subsequent sentence context in auditory word recognition: Temporal and linguistic constraints. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 234-250.
5.
Connine, C.M., Blasko, D.G., & Titone, D. (1993). Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 193 - 210.
6.
Connine, C.M., Titone, D., Deelman, T., & Blasko, D.G. (1997). Similarity mapping in spoken word recognition . Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 463-480.
7.
Deelman, T., & Connine, C.M. (2001). Missing information in spoken word recognition: Non-released stop consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 656-663.
8.
Frauenfelder, U.H., & Peeters, G. (1990). Lexical segmentation in TRACE: An exercise in simulation. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 267-283.
10.
Grosjean, F. (1985). The recognition of words after their acoustic offset: Evidence and implications. Perception and Psychophysics , 38, 299-310.
11.
Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1973). Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies. Nature, 244, 522-523.
12.
Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition . Cognition, 25, 71-102.
13.
Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive modelsof speech processing (pp.148-172).Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
14.
Marslen-Wilson, W.D., & Zwitserlood, P. (1989). Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 576-585.
15.
Martin, J.G., Mills, C.B., Meltzer, R.H., & Shields, J.H. (1980). Anticipatory coarticulation and reaction time to phoneme targets in spontaneous speech. Phonetica, 37, 159-168.
16.
Mattys, S.L. (1997). The use of time during lexical processing and segmentation: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4,310-329.
17.
McClelland, J.L., & Elman, J.L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
18.
Meltzer, R.H., Martin, J.G., Mills, C.B., Imhoff, D.L., & Zohar, D. (1976). Reaction time to temporally-displaced phoneme targets in continuous speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 2, 277-290.
19.
Milberg, W., Blumstein, S., & Dworetzky, B. (1988). Phonological factors in lexical access: Evidence from an auditory lexical decision task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 305-308.
20.
Norris, D. (1990). A dynamic-net model of human speech recognition . In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Norris, D., McQueen, J., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition. Behavioral and Brain Science, 23, 299-325.
22.
Perkell, J.S. (1980). Phonetic features and the physiology of speech production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Speech and talk (Vol. 1,pp.337-372).New York: Academic Press.
23.
Pitt, M.A., & Samuel, A.G. (1995). Lexical and sublexical feedback in auditory word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 149-188.
24.
Samuel, A.G. (1981). The role of bottom-up confirmation in the phonemic restoration illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1124-1131.
25.
Sidák, Z. (1967). Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 626-633.
26.
Simpson, G. (1984). Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 316-340.
27.
Streeter, L.A., & Nigro, G.N. (1979). The role of medial consonant transitions in word perception. Journal Acoustical Society of America, 65, 1533-1541.
28.
Titone, D.A., & Connine, C.M. (1994). The comprehension of idiomatic expressions: Effects of predictability and literality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 20, 1126-1138.
29.
Warren, P., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1987). Continuous uptake of acoustic cues in spoken word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics , 41, 262-275.
Whalen, D.H. (1991). Subcategorical phonetic mismatches and lexical access. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 351-360.
32.
Zwitserlood, P., & Schriefers, H. (1995). Effects of sensory information and processing time in spoken-word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 121 - 136.
