This study tested the issue of whether extended length of residence (LOR) in adulthood can provide sufficient input to overcome age effects. The study replicates Flege, Takagi, and Mann (1995), which found that 10 out of 12 Japanese learners of English with extensive residence (12 years or more) produced liquids as accurately as native speakers of English (NS). Further, for both accuracy and native-like accentedness, the Japanese with extensive residence performed statistically better as a group than inexperienced Japanese (less than 3 years of residence). Results with a new sample of Japanese learners in this study found no statistical difference between the Japanese groups with extended versus short LOR although both reported equal levels of daily input in English. Additionally, both groups received statistically lower scores than NS. Moreover, LOR affected the two groups differently: The accuracy and native-like accentedness of words and sentences by Japanese with extensive residence declined with LOR (and chronological age when age of arrival was partialled out), while for Japanese with short residence accent improved with increased LOR (but not age). This study is the first to document a decline in second language production ability with LOR and age in older second language learners. However, this finding deserves to be addressed with further research, as the study was not designed to investigate this question and thus not all relevant factors, such as motivation or attitude, were controlled for. The results from the short-residence learners indicate that the initial one to two years of immersion may be the most important for improving phonological ability.
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 57, 289 - 300.
2.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F.I.M., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19(2), 290 - 303.
3.
Bongaerts, T. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the Critical Period hypothesis (pp.133-159). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
4.
Bongaerts, T., Mennen, S., & van der Slik, F. (2000). Authenticity of pronunciation in naturalistic second language acquisition: The case of very advanced late learners of Dutch as a second language. Studia Linguistica , 54(2), 298-308.
5.
Bongaerts, T., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1995). Can late learners attain a native accent in a foreign language? A test of the Critical Period hypothesis. In D. Singleton & Z. Lengyel (Eds.), The age factor in second language acquisition (pp. 30-50). Bristol, PA: Multilingual Matters.
6.
Bongaerts, T., van Summeren, C., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. SSLA, 19, 447-465.
7.
Chaudron, C. (1983). Research on metalinguistic judgments: A review of theory, methods, and results. Language Learning, 33(3), 343-377.
8.
Craik, F.I.M., & Jacoby, L.L. (1996). Aging and memory: Implications for skilled performance . In W. A. Rogers, A. D. Fisk & N. Walker (Eds.), Aging and skilled performance: Advanced in theory and applications (pp. 113-137). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
Dekeyser, R.M., & Larson-Hall, J. (2005). What does the Critical Period really mean? In J. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Dickerson, L., & Dickerson, W. (1977). Interlanguage phonology: Current research and future directions. The notions of simplification, interlanguages, and pidgins, and their relation to second language pedagogy, Actes du 5eme Colloque de Linguistique Appliquee de Neuchatel (pp.18-30). Geneva: Droz.
11.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
12.
Flege, J.E. (1987). A critical period for learning to pronounce foreign languages? Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 162-177.
13.
Flege, J.E. (1999). Age of learning and second language speech. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the Critical Period hypothesis (pp. 101-131). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Flege, J.E., Bohn, O.S., & Jang, S. (1997). The production and perception of English vowels . Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437-470.
15.
Flege, J.E., & Fletcher, K.L. (1992). Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived accent. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(1), 370-389.
16.
Flege, J.E., & Liu, S. (2001). The effect of experience on adults' acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 23, 527-552.
17.
Flege, J.E., & MacKay, I.R.A. (2004). Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 1-34.
Flege, J.E., Munro, M.J., & MacKay, I.R.A. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3125 - 3138.
20.
Flege, J.E., Takagi, N., & Mann, V.A. (1995). Japanese adults can learn to produce English /r/ and /l/ accurately. Language and Speech, 38(1), 25-55.
21.
Flege, J.E., Yeni-Komshian, G., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition . Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78-104.
22.
Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds `l' and `r'. Neuropsychologia, 9, 317-323.
23.
Guion, S.G., Flege, J.E., & Loftin, J.D. (2000). The effect of L1 use on pronunciation in Quichua-Spanish bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 28(1), 27-42.
24.
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539-588). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
25.
Jia, G.X., & Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics , 24, 131-161.
26.
Jia, G.X., Aaronson, D., & Wu, Y. (2002). Long-term language attainment of bilingual immigrants: Predictive variables and language group differences. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 599-621.
27.
Klein, R. (2004). Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28.
Long, M.H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development . SSLA, 12(3), 251-285.
29.
Major, R.C. (1994). Current trends in interlanguage phonology. In M. Yavas (Ed.), First and second language phonology (pp.181-203). San Diego: Singular.
30.
Maxwell, S.E., & Delaney, H.D. (2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
31.
McManus, C., & Pleines, C. (2005). Personality, emotional intelligence, motivations and barriers in second language learning. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, New York .
32.
Moyer, A. (2004). Age, accent and experience in second language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
33.
Munro, M.J., & Derwing, T.M. (2001). Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 451-468.
34.
Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research , 5, 261-283.
35.
Piske, T., Flege, J.E., MacKay, I.R.A., & Meador, D. (2002). The production of English vowels by fluent early and late Italian-English bilinguals. Phonetica, 59, 49-71.
36.
Piske, T., MacKay, I.R.A., & Flege, J.E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191 -215.
37.
Ryalls, J., Cliche, A., Fortier-Blanc, I.C., & Prud'Hommeaux, A. (1997). Voice-onset time in younger and older French-speaking Canadians. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 11(3), 205-212.
38.
Sato, C. (1985). Task variation in interlanguage phonology. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp.181-196). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
39.
Scott, M.L. (1994). Auditory memory and perception in younger and older adult second language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 263-281.
40.
Sheldon, A., & Strange, W. (1982). The acquisition of / / and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 243-261.
41.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In M. H. Long & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp.183-205). New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Sweeting, P., & Baken, R. (1982). Voice onset time in a normal-aged population. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25, 129-134.
43.
Thompson, I. (1991). Foreign accents revisited: The English pronunciation of Russian immigrants. Language Learning, 41(2), 177-204.
44.
Van Rooij, J.C.G. M., & Plomp, R. (1990). Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. II: Multivariate analyses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 2611-2624.
45.
Van Rooij, J.C.G. M., & Plomp, R. (1992). Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. III. Additional data and final discussion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(2), 1028-1033.
46.
Wilcox, R.R. (2001). Fundamentals of modern statistical methods: Substantially improving power and accuracy. New York: Springer.
Yeni-Komshian, G., Flege, J.E., & Liu, S. (2000). Pronunciation proficiency in the first and second languages of Korean-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(2), 131-149.
49.
Zacks, R.T., Hasher, L., & Li, K.Z.H. (2000). Human memory. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp.293-357). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum .
