The article describes the contrastive possibilities of alignment of high accents in three Romance varieties, namely, Central Catalan, Neapolitan Italian, and Pisa Italian. The Romance languages analyzed in this article provide crucial evidence that small differences in alignment in rising accents should be encoded phonologically. To account for such facts within the AM model, the article develops the notion of “phonological anchoring” as an extension of the concept of secondary association originally proposed by Pierrehumbert and Beckman (1988), and later adopted by Grice (1995), Grice, Ladd, and Arvaniti (2000), and others to explain the behavior of edge tones. The Romance data represent evidence that not only peripheral edge tones seek secondary associations. We claim that the phonological representation of
Anderson, A., Bader, M., Bard, E., Boyle, E., Doherty, G., Garrod, S., Isard, S., Kowtko, J., McAllister, J., Miller, J., Sotillo, C., Thompson, H., & Weinert, R. (1991). The HCRC map task corpus. Language and Speech, 34(4), 351 - 366.
2.
Arranz, P., & Garrido, J.M. (2001). Unestudio perceptivo del desplazamiento del pico acentual en español. Ms. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona .
3.
Arvaniti, A., & Baltazani, M. (2004). Greek ToBI. In Jun, S. -A. (Ed.), Prosodic models and transcription: Towards prosodic typology (pp. 84-117). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
Arvaniti, A., Ladd, D.R., & Mennen, I. (1998). Stability of tonal alignment: The case of Greek prenuclear accents. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 3-25.
5.
Arvaniti, A., Ladd, D.R., & Mennen, I. (2000). What is a starred tone? Evidence from Greek. In M. Broe & J. Pierrehumbert (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V: Acquisition and the lexicon (pp. 119-131). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Atterer, M., & Ladd, D.R. (2004). On the phonetics and phonology of "segmental anchoring" of F0: Evidence from German. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 177-197.
7.
Beckman, M. (2004). Tone inventories and tune-text alignments. ESF Workshop on Typology of Tone and Intonation. Cascais, Portugal, April 1-3 , 2004. <http://ling.osu.edu/~mbeckman/795Tsu2004/typology/>
8.
Beckman, M., Díaz-Campos, M., McGory, J.T., & Morgan, T.A. (2002). Intonation across Spanish, in the Tones and Break Indices framework. Probus, 14, 9-36.
9.
Beckman, M., & Pierrehumbert, J. (1986) Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255-309.
10.
Bruce, G. (1977). Swedish word accents in sentence perspective. Gleerup: Lund.
11.
Caspers, J. (1999). The early versus the late accent-lending fall in Dutch: Phonetic variation or phonological difference. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetics Sciences , San Francisco, 945-948.
12.
Cole, J. (2000). Commentary: Integrating the phonetics and phonology of tone alignment. In M. Broe & J. Pierrehumbert (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V: Acquisition and the lexicon (pp.168-179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
De la Mota, C. (1995). La representación gramatical de la información nueva en el discurso. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
14.
D'Imperio, M. (1995). Timing differences between prenuclear and nuclear pitch accents in Italian. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98(5), 28-94.
15.
D'Imperio, M. (2000). The role of perception in tonal targets and their alignment. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ohio State University: <http://www./lpl.univ-aix.fr/lpl/documents/theses/mpthesis.pdf> ;
16.
D'Imperio, M. (2001). Focus and tonal structure in Neapolitan Italian . Speech Communication, 33(4), 339-356.
17.
D'Imperio, M. (2002a). Italian intonation: An overview and some questions . Probus, 14, 37 - 69.
18.
D'Imperio, M. (2002b). Language-specific and universal constraints on tonal alignment: The nature of Targets and "Anchors." In B. Bel & I. Marlien (Eds.), Proceedings of Speech Prosody2002, 101-106.
19.
D'Imperio, M. (2003). Tonal structure and pitch targets in Italian focus constituents. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 2 (Special volume on Romance Intonation, Ed. by P. Prieto), 55 - 65.
20.
D'Imperio, M., & House, D. (1997). Perception of questions and statements in Neapolitan Italian. Proceedings of Eurospeech '97, 1, 251-254.
21.
D'Imperio, M., & Rosenthall, S. (1999). Phonetics and phonology of main stress in Italian. Phonology, 16(1), 1-28.
22.
Elordieta, G. (1998). Intonation in a pitch accent variety of Basque. International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology. ASJU, 32, 511-569.
23.
Estebas-Vilaplana, E. (2000). The use and realization of accentual focus in Central Catalan. Ph.D. Dissertation, University College London.
24.
Estebas-Vilaplana, E. (2003). Catalan pre-nuclear accents: Evidence for word-edge tones. In M. J. Solé, D. Recasens, & J. Romero (Eds.), Proceedings of the XVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1779-1782). Barcelona: Causal Productions.
25.
Face, T. (2001a). Intonational marking of contrastive focus in Madrid Spanish. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ohio State University . Published by Lincom Europa, 2002 .
26.
Face, T. (2001b). Focus and early peak alignment in Spanish intonation . Probus, 13, 223 - 246.
27.
Frota, S. (2000). Prosody and focus in European Portuguese. Phonological phrasing and intonation. New York: Garland Publishing.
28.
Frota, S. (2002). Tonal association and target alignment in European Portuguese nuclear falls. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology VII (pp. 387-418). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
29.
Frota, S. (2003). The phonological status of initial peaks in European Portuguese. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 2 (Special volume on Romance Intonation, Ed. by P. Prieto), 133 - 152.
30.
Gili Fivela, B. (1999). The prosody of left-dislocated topicalized constituents in Italian read speech. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology 1, Budapest , Hungary, pp. 531-534.
31.
Gili Fivela, B. (2002). Tonal alignment in two Pisa Italian peak accents . In B. Bel & I. Marlien (Eds.), Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2002 Conference (pp. 339-342), Aix-en-Provence .
32.
Gili Fivela, B. (2004). The phonetics and phonology of intonation: The case of Pisa Italian. Ph.D. Dissertation, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa.
33.
Gili Fivela, B., & D'Imperio, M. (2004). Tonal alignment of prenuclear accents in Italian: A study on the varieties spoken in Pisa and Naples. ESF International Conference on Tone and Intonation. Santorini (Greece), September 9-11, 2004.
34.
Gili Fivela, B., & Savino, M. (2003). Segments, syllables and tonal alignment: A study on two varieties of Italian. Proceedings of the XVth International Conference of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona , Spain, 3-9 August 2003, pp.2933-2936.
35.
Godjevac, S. (2000). An autosegmental/metrical analysis of Serbo-Croatian intonation. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics , 54, 79-142.
36.
Goldsmith, J. (1979). Autosegmental Phonology. Garland , New York-Ph.D. thesis 1976.
37.
Grice, M. (1995). The intonation of Palermo Italian: Implications for intonation theory. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
38.
Grice, M., Bauman, S., & Benzmüller, R. (2005a). German intonation in autosegmental-metrical phonology. In Jun, S.-A. (Ed.), Prosodic models and transcription: Towards prosodic typology (pp. 55-83). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
39.
Grice, M., & Benzmüller, R. (1995). Transcription of German Intonation using ToBI-Tones-The Saarbrücken system. In W. J. Barry & J. Koreman (Eds.), PHONUS, 1, pp. 35 - 52.
40.
Grice, M., D'Imperio, M., Savino, M., & Avesani, C. (2005b). Towards a strategy for labeling varieties of Italian. In Jun, S.-A. (Ed.), Prosodic models and transcription: Towards prosodic typology (pp. 55-83). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
41.
Grice, M., Ladd, D.R., & Arvaniti, A. (2000). On the place of phrase accents in intonational phonology, Phonology, 17, 143-185.
42.
Grice, M., & Savino, M. (2003). Map tasks in Italian: Asking questions about given, accessible and new information. Catalan Journal of Linguistics , 2, 153-180.
43.
Gussenhoven, C. (2000). The boundary tones are coming: On the nonperipheral realization of boundary tones. In M. Broe & J. Pierrehumbert (Eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the Lexicon (pp. 132-151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Gussenhoven, C., & Kerkhoff, J. (2001). The synthesis of Dutch intonation on the basis of ToDI labels. Workshop on Tone and Intonation in Europe, Vitoria-Gasteiz, June 2001 .
46.
Gussenhoven, C., Rietveld, T., & Terken, J. (1999). ToDI: Transcription of Dutch Intonation. <http://lands.let.kun.nl/todi>.
47.
Gussenhoven, C., & van der Vliet, (1999). The phonology of tone and intonation in the Dutch dialect of Venlo. Journal of Linguistics, 35, 99-135.
48.
Hirschberg, J., & Ward, G. (1992). The influence of pitch range, duration, amplitude and spectral features on the interpretation of the rise-fall-rise intonation contour in English, Journal of Phonetics, 20, 241-251.
49.
Hualde, J.I. (2002). Intonation in Spanish and the other Ibero-Romance languages: Overview and status quaestionis. In C. Wiltshire & J. Campos (Eds.), Romance phonology and variation. Selected papers from the 30th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (pp. 101-116). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
50.
Hualde, J.I. (2003a). Remarks on the diachronic reconstruction of intonational patterns in Romance with special attention to Occitan as a bridge language . Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 2 (Special volume on Romance Intonation, Ed. by P. Prieto), 181-205.
51.
Hualde, J.I. (2003b). El modelo métrico y autosegmental. In Prieto, P. (Ed.), Teorías de la entonación (pp.155-184). Barcelona: Editorial Ariel.
52.
Jun, S.A., & Fougeron, C. (2000). A phonological model of French intonation. In A. Botinis (Ed.), Intonation: Analysis, modeling and technology (pp. 209-242). Boston: Kluwer.
53.
Ladd, D.R. (1983). Phonological features of intonational peaks. Language, 59, 721-759.
54.
Ladd, D.R. (1994). Constraints on the gradient variability of pitch range, or, Pitch level 4 lives!. In P. A. Keating (Ed.), Phonological structure and phonetic form. Papers in laboratory phonology III (pp.43-63), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts .
55.
Ladd, D.R. (1996). Intonational phonology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
56.
Ladd, D.R. (2004). Segmental anchoring of pitch movements: Autosegmental phonology or speech production? In H. Quene & V. van Heuven (Eds.), On speech and language: Studies for Sieb G. Nooteboom (pp. 123-131). Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics (LOT).
57.
Liberman, M. (1975). The intonational system of English. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachussetts Institute of Technology. Garland Publishing , 1979.
58.
Marotta, G. (2000). Allineamento e trascrizione dei toni accentuali complessi: Una proposta. Atti delle 10e Giornate di Studio del Gruppo di Fonetica Sperimentale, Collana degli Atti dell'Associazione Italiana di Acustica., vol. XXVII, Napoli 2000, pp.139-149.
59.
Pierrehumbert, J.B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology .
60.
Pierrehumbert, J., & Beckman, M. (1988). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
61.
Pierrehumbert, J.B., & Steele, S. (1989). Categories of tonal alignment in English. Phonetica, 46, 181-196.
62.
Prieto, P. (1998). The scaling of the L tone line in Spanish downstepping contours. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 261-282.
63.
Prieto, P. (2002a). Entonació. In Solà, J.,M.-R. Lloret, J. Mascaró & M. Pérez-Saldanya (Eds.), Gramàtica del català contemporani (pp. 393-462). Barcelona: Editorial Empúries.
64.
Prieto, P. (2002b). Entonació: Models, teoria, mètodes. Barcelona: Ariel.
65.
Prieto, P. (2004a). The search for phonological targets in the tonal space: Evidence from five sentence-types in peninsular Spanish. In T. Face (Ed.), Laboratory approaches to Spanish phonology (pp.29-59). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
66.
Prieto, P. (2005a). Stability effects in tonal clash contexts in Catalan. Journal of Phonetics, 33(2), 215-242.
67.
Prieto, P. (2005b). En torno a la asociación tonal en el modelo métrico-autosegmental. Puntos controvertidos en su aplicación al catalán. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, 6(3), (Special issue on Prosodic Aspects , Ed. by Johannes Kabatek), 9-28.
68.
Prieto, P. (in press). Word-edge tones in Catalan. (Special issue on autosegmental-metrical approaches to intonation in Europe: Tonal targets and anchors, Ed. by M. D'Imperio). Italian Journal of Linguistics, 17.
69.
Prieto, P., & Torreira, F. (2004). Anchoring Effects in Spanish. ESF International Conference on Tone and Intonation. Santorini (Greece), September 9-11, 2004.
70.
Prieto, P., van Santen, J., & Hirschberg, J. (1995). Tonal alignment patterns in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 23, 429-451.
71.
Schepman, A., Lickley, R., & Ladd, D.R. (in press). Effects of vowel length and "right context" on the alignment of Dutch nuclear accents. Journal of Phonetics.
72.
Silverman, K.E.A., Beckman, M., Pitrelli, J.F., Ostendorf, M., Wightman, C., Price, P., & Pierrehumbert, J. (1992). ToBI: A standard for labeling English prosody. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 867 - 870.
73.
Silverman, K., & Pierrehumbert, J. (1990). The timing of prenuclear high accents in English. In Papers in laboratory phonology I. Between the grammar and physics of speech (pp.72-106), J. Kingston & M. E. Beckman (Eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74.
Smiljanic, R. (2002). Lexical, pragmatic and positional effects on prosody in two dialects of Croatian and Serbian: An acoustic study. Ph.D. Dissertation , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
75.
Smiljanic, R. (forthcoming). Early versus late focus: Pitch-peak alignment in two dialects of Serbian and Croatian. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology, 8. Yale University and Haskins Laboratories, USA.
76.
Smiljanic, R., & Hualde, J.I. (2000). Lexical and pragmatic functions of tonal alignment in two Serbo-Croatian dialects. In A. Okrent & J. Boyle (Eds.), Chicago Linguistic Society 36, vol. 1, The main session (pp.469-482). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
77.
Sosa, J.M. (1999). La entonación del español. Barcelona: Cátedra.
78.
Toledo, G. (2003). Modelo autosegmental y entonación: Los corpus DIES-RTVP, Estudios de Fonética Experimental, 12, 143-163.
79.
Verhoeven, J. (1994). The discrimination of pitch movement alignment in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics, 22, 65-85.
80.
Vigário, M., & Frota, S. (2004). The intonation of Standard and Northern European Portuguese: A comparative intonational phonology approach. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 2(2). 115-137.
81.
Ward, G., & Hirschberg, J. (1985). Implicating uncertainty. The pragmatics of fall-rise intonation. Language, 61, 747-776.
82.
Welby, P. (2003). The slaying of Lady Mondegreen, being a study of French tonal association and alignment and their role in speech segmentation. Ph.D. Dissertation, The Ohio State University.
83.
Welby, P. (2004). The structure of French intonational rises: A study of text-to-tune alignment. In B. Bel & I. Marlien (Eds.), Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2004 Conference (pp. 127-130). Nara, Japan.
