This study looks at the syllable onset interval (SOI) patterning in Taiwan Mandarin spontaneous speech and its relationship to discourse and syntactic units. Monologs were elicited by asking readers to tell stories depicted in comic strips and were transcribed and segmented into Discourse Segment Units (Grosz & Sidner, 1986), clauses, and phrases. Results showed that the degree of final lengthening was modulated by boundary types. Lengthening before discourse boundaries was longer than that before clausal boundaries, which was in turn longer than that before phrasal boundaries. Final SOI lengthening also seemed to reflect cognitive load. At the discourse and clausal levels, the degree of lengthening is modulated by narration order. First narrations tended to have longer final SOIs than second narrations. In addition, there was also a mild lengthening effect in nonfinal SOIs, as was evidenced by the length differences in initial and medial SOIs and the differential lengthening effect regarding the positioning of phrases in a clause.
Butcher, A. (1980). Pause and syntactic structure. In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Temporal variables in speech: Studies in honor of Frieda Goldman-Eisler (pp. 85-90). Berlin: Mouton.
2.
Campbell, W.N. (1991). Theories of prosodic structure: Evidence from syllable duration. Proceedings of 12th International Congress of Phonetics Sciences, 290-293.
Ferreira, F. (1993). Creation of prosody during sentence production . Psychological Review, 100(2), 233-253.
5.
Fon, Y.-J.J. (2002). A cross-linguistic study on syntactic and discourse boundary cues in spontaneous speech. Dissertation. The Ohio State University.
6.
Gabrielsson, A. (1993). The complexities of rhythm. In T. J. Tighe & W. J. Dowling (Eds.), Psychology and music: The understanding of melody and rhythm (pp. 93-120). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Goldman-Eisler, F. (1972). Pauses, clauses, sentences. Language and Speech, 15, 103-113.
8.
Grosjean, F. (1980). Linguistic structures and performance structures: Studies in pause distribution. In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Temporal variables in speech: Studies in honor of Frieda Goldman-Eisler (pp. 91-106). Berlin: Mouton.
9.
Grosz, B., & Hirschberg, J. (1992). Some intonational characteristics of discourse structure. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Spoken Language Processing, 429 - 432.
10.
Grosz, B.J., & Sidner, C.L. (1986). Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse . Computational Linguistics, 12(3), 175-204.
11.
Handel, S. (1993). The effect of tempo and tone duration on rhythm discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 54(3), 370-382.
12.
Hirschberg, J., & Nakatani, C.H. (1996). A prosodic analysis of discourse segments in direction-giving monologs. Proceedings of International Congress of Speech and Language Processing, 286-293.
13.
Huggins, A.W.F. (1972). Just noticeable differences for segment duration in natural speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 51, 1270-1278.
14.
Keller, E., Zellner, B., Werner, S., & Blanchoud, N. (1993). The prediction of prosodic timing: Rules for final syllable lengthening in French. Proceedings of the European Speech Communication Association (ESCA) Workshop on Prosody, 212-215. Lund , Sweden.
15.
Klatt, D.H. (1975). Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in a connected discourse. Journal Phonetics, 3, 129-140.
16.
Kowal, S.O'Connell, D.C.O'Brien, E.A., & Bryant, E.T. (1975). Temporal aspects of reading aloud and speaking: Three experiments. American Journal of Psychology, 88(4), 549-569.
17.
Ladd, D.R. (1988). Declination "reset" and the hierarchical organization of utterances. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 84(2), 530-544.
18.
Lehiste, I. (1973). Phonetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity . Glossa, 7(2), 107-121.
19.
Lehiste, I. (1975a). The phonetic structure of paragraphs. In A. Cohen & S. Nooteboom (Eds.), Structure and process in speech perception (pp. 195-206). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
20.
Lehiste, I. (1975b). The role of temporal factors in the establishment of linguistic units and boundaries. In W. U. Dressler & F. V. Mares (Eds.), Phonologica, 1972 (pp. 115-122). München- Salzburg, Germany: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
21.
Lehiste, I. (1979). Perception of sentence and paragraph boundaries . In B. Lindblom & S. Oehman (Eds.), Frontiers of speech communication research (pp. 191 - 201). London: Academic Press.
22.
Lehiste, I., Olive, J.P., & Streeter, L.A. (1976). Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60(5), 1199 - 1202.
23.
Lehiste, I., & Wang, W.S.-Y. (1977). Perception of sentence boundaries with and without semantic information. In W. U. Dressler & O. E., Pfeiffer (Eds.), Phonologica, 1976: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft (pp. 277-283). Innsbruck, Germany: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.
24.
Li, C., & Thompson, S. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar . University of California Press.
25.
Nakatani, L.H.O'Connor, K.D., & Aston, C.H. (1981). Prosodic aspects of American English speech rhythm . Phonetica, 38, 84-106.
26.
O'Malley, M.H., Kloker, O.R., & Dara-Abrams, D. (1973). Recovering parentheses from spoken algebraic expressions. I.E.E.E. Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics, AU-21(3), 217-220.
27.
Rietveld, T., & Van Hout, R.1993. Statistical Techniques for the study of language and language behavior. Mouton de Gruyter.
28.
Scott, D.R. (1982). Duration as a cue to the perception of a phrase boundary. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71(4), 996-1007.
29.
Zellner, B. (1994). Pauses and the temporal structure of speech. In E. Keller (Ed.), Fundamentals of speech synthesis and speech recognition (pp. 41-62). Chichester: John Wiley.
30.
Zellner, B. (1998). Fast and slow speech rate: A characterization for French. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 7, 3159-3163.
