Prosodic boundaries are marked in speech by modifications to dimensions such as F0, duration, and segmental quality. The experiment reported here tests the hypothesis that modifications at the end of a prosodic domain may be amplified or attenuated depending on the type of sentence (statement or question). The prosodic modifications investigated here for French are sentence-final lengthening and vowel devoicing, which is related to changes in voice quality.
Six native speakers of French read 10 matched sets of sentences, which included both statements and questions. Measurements were made of the last vowel in each test sentence and of sentence-medial vowels in control sentences. Statement-final vowels were less periodic and more often devoiced than vowels at the end of questions or sentencemedial vowels, but question-final vowels were lengthened more than statement-final vowels. These results occurred in questions both with and without a final pitch rise, suggesting that sentence type is more important than final intonation contour in determining how prosodic finality is marked. The difference between statements and questions thus appears to be in the relative importance of lengthening and voice quality modification in marking finality, not in the overall extent to which it is marked.
Bailly, G., Aubergé, V., & Morlec, Y. (1997). Des représentations cognitives aux représentations phonétiques de l'intonation [From cognitive to phonetic representations of intonation]. In J. Perrot(Ed.), Polyphonie pour Iván Fónagy [Polyphony for Iván Fónagy] (pp. 19-28). Paris : L'Harmattan.
2.
Bard, E., Sotillo, C., Anderson, A., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Newlands, A. (1995). The control of intelligibility in running speech . Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 188-191). Stockholm.
3.
Beckman, M.E. (1996). The parsing of prosody. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 17-47.
4.
Beckman, M.E., & Edwards, J. (1992). Intonational categories and the articulatory control of duration. In Y. Tohkura, E. Vatikiotis-Bateson, & Y. Sagisaka (Eds.), Speech perception, production and linguistic structure (pp. 359-375). Tokyo: IOS Press .
5.
Beckman, M.E., & Venditti, J. (2000). Tagging prosody and discourse structure in elicited spontaneous speech . In Proceedings of the Science and Technology Agency Priority Program Symposium on Spontaneous Speech: Corpus and Processing Techniques (pp. 87-98). Tokyo, Japan.
6.
Benguerel, A.-P. (1971). Duration of French vowels in unemphatic stress . Language and Speech, 14, 383-391.
7.
Blankenship, B. (1997). The time course of breathiness and laryngealization in vowels. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UCLA.
8.
Blankenship, B. (2002). The timing of non modal phonation in vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 163-191.
9.
Byrd, D., & Saltzm An, E. (1998). Intragestural dynamics of multiple prosodic boundaries . Journal of Phonetics, 26, 173-199.
10.
Cambier-Langeveld, T., & Turk, A. (1999). A cross-linguistic study of accentual lengthening: Dutch versus English. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 255-280.
11.
Cooper, W.E., & Paccia-Cooper, J. (1980). Syntax and speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
12.
Crompton, A. (1980). Timing patterns in French. Phonetica , 37, 205-234.
13.
Crystal, T., & House, A. (1988). Segmental durations in connected-speech signals: Current results. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 83, 1553-1573.
14.
Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & Van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech , 40, 141-201.
15.
Delais, E. (1994). Rythmeet structure prosodique en français [Rhythm and prosodic structure in French]. In C. Lyche (Ed.), French generative phonology: Retrospective and perspectives (pp. 131-150). Salford, U.K.: Association for French Language Studies.
16.
Delattre, P. (1966). Les dix intonations de base du français [The ten basic intonation contours of French]. The French Review, 40, 1-14.
17.
Di Cristo, A. (1998). Intonation in French. In D. Hirst & A. Di Cristo (Eds.), Intonation systems: A survey of 20 languages (pp. 195 - 218). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Eady, S., & Cooper , W.E. (1986). Speech intonation and focus location in matched statements and questions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80, 402-415.
19.
Edwards, J., Beckman, M.E., & Fletcher, J. (1991). The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 369-382.
20.
Fagyal, Z., & Moisset, C. (1999). Sound change and articulatory release: Where and why are high vowels devoiced in Parisian French. Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp.309-312). San Francisco.
21.
Fant, G., Kruckenberg, A., & Nord, L. (1991).Durational correlates of stress in Swedish, French and English. Journal of Phonetics, 19, 351 - 365.
22.
Fletcher, J. (1991). Rhythm and final lengthening in French. Journal of Phonetics, 19, 193-212.
23.
Fónagy, I. (1989).Le français change de visage? The changing face of French]. Revue Romane [Romance Review], 24, 225-254.
24.
Fougeron, C. (1999). Prosodically conditioned articulatory variation: A review. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 97, 1-73.
25.
Fougeron, C., & Keating, P. (1997). Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 3728-3740.
26.
Fowler, C., & Housum, J. (1987). Talkers'signaling of "new" and "old" words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 489-504.
27.
Fowler, C., Levy, E., & Brown, J. (1997). Reductions of spoken words in certain discourse contexts. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 24 - 40.
28.
Grosz, B., & Hirschberg, J. (1992). Some intonational characteristics of discourse structure. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp.429-432). Banff, Alberta.
29.
Haan J., Van Heuven, V.J., Pacilly, J., & Van Bezooijen, R. (1997). An anatomy of Dutch question intonation. In J. Coerts & H. de Hoop (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands, 1997 (pp.97-108). AVT Publications 14. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
30.
Hillenbrand, J., Cleveland, R., & Erickson, R. (1994). Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 769-778.
31.
Hirschberg, J., & Pierrehum Bert, J. (1986). The intonational structuring of discourse. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 136-144). New York.
32.
Hirst, D., & Di Cristo, A. (1984). French intonation: A parametric approach. Die Neuren Sprachen, 83, 554-569.
33.
Jun, S.-A., & Fougeron, C. (2000). A phonological model of French intonation. In A. Botinis (Ed.), Intonation: Analysis, Modeling and Technology (pp. 209-242). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
34.
Klatt, D. (1975). Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in a connected discourse. Journal of Phonetics, 3, 129-140.
35.
Krakow, R., Bell-Berti, F., & Wang, Q. (1995). Supralaryngeal declination: Evidence from the velum. In F. Bell-Berti & L. J. Raphael (Eds.), Producing speech: A Festschrift for Katherine Safford Harris (pp. 333-353). Woodbury, NY: AIP Press.
36.
Lacheret-Dujour, A., & Beaugendre, F. (1999). La prosodie du français [The prosody of French]. Paris: CNRS Editions.
37.
L'Huillier, M. (1999). Advanced French grammar. Cambridge , U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Littell, R., Milliken, G., Stroup, W., & Wolfinger, R. (1996). SAS System for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
39.
Loeven Bruck, H. (1999). An investigation of articulatory correlates of the accentual phrase in French. Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 667-670). San Francisco.
40.
Nakajima, S., & Allen, J. (1993). A study on prosody and discourse structure in cooperative dialogs. Phonetica. 50, 197-210.
41.
Nooteboom, S., & Eefting, W. (1994). Evidence for the adaptive nature of speech on the phrase level and below. Phonetica, 51, 92-98.
42.
Ohala, J.J. (1994). The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 325-347). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Oller, D.K. (1973). The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 1235-1247.
44.
Post, B. (2000). Pitch accents, liaison and the phonological phrase in French. Probus, 12, 127-164.
45.
Rand, D., & Sankoff, D. (1990). GoldVarb Manual, version 2. Centre de Recherche Mathémathiques, Université de Montréal. Available from: <http://www.crm.umontreal.ca/~sankoff/GoldVarb_Eng.html>.
46.
Rietveld, T., & Van Hout, R. (1993). Statistical techniques for the study of language and language behavior. Berlin : Mouton deGruyter.
47.
Rossi, M. (1981). Intonation, énonciation, syntaxe [Intonation, enunciation, syntax]. In M. Rossi, A. Di Cristo, D. Hirst , P. Martin & Y. Nishinuma (Eds.), L'intonation: de l'acoustique à la sémantique [Intonation: from acoustics to semantics] (pp. 184-233). Paris: Klincksieck.
48.
San Koff, D. (1988). Variable rules. In Sociolinguistics: An international hand book of the science of language and society (pp. 984-997). Berlin: de Gruyter.
49.
Sas Institute (1998). Stat View Reference Manual. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
50.
Sereno, J., & Jongman, A. (1995). Acoustic correlates of grammatical class. Language and Speech, 38, 57-76.
51.
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Turk, A. (1996). A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research , 25, 193-247.
52.
Smith, C. (1997). The devoicing of /z/ in American English: Effects of local and prosodic context. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 471-500.
53.
Smith, C. (submitted). Vowel devoicing in contemporary French.
54.
Swerts, M. (1997). Prosodic features at discourse boundaries of different strength. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 514-521.
55.
Swerts, M., & Geluykens, R. (1994). Prosody as a marker of information flow in spoken discourse. Language and Speech, 37, 21-43.
56.
Swerts, M., Bouwhuis, D., & Collier , R. (1994). Melodiccues to the perceived "finality" of utterances . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 2064-2075.
57.
Vaissière, J. (1991). Rhythm, accentuation and final lengthening in French. In J. Sundberg, L. Nord, & R. Carlson (Eds.), Music, language, speech, and brain (pp. 108-120). Proceedings of an international symposium at the Wenner-Gren Center, Stockholm, 5-8 September, 1990. New York : Macmillan Press.
58.
Van Donselaar, W. (1995). Listeners' use of the "information-accentuation" interdependence in processing implicit and explicit references. Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (pp. 979-982). Madrid.
59.
Van Donzel, M., & Koopmans-Van Beinum, F. (2000). Pitch movements and information structure in spontaneous Dutch discourse. In A. Botinis (Ed.), Intonation: Analysis, modeling and technology (pp. 145-161). Dordrecht: Kluwer .
60.
Van Heuven, V., & Haan, J. (2000). Phonetic correlates of statement versus question intonation in Dutch. In A. Botinis (Ed.), Intonation: Analysis, modeling and technology (pp. 119-143). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
61.
Vayra, M., & Fowler, C. (1992). Declination of supralaryngeal gestures in spoken Italian. Phonetica, 49, 48-60.
62.
Venditti, J.J. (2000). Discourse structure and attentional salience effects on Japanese intonation. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Ohio State University.
63.
Vincent, M. (1998). Structuration du discours en unités intonatives [Structuring of discourse into intonation units]. Travaux de l'Institutde Phonétique d'Aix [Working papers of the Aix Institute of Phonetics] , 18, 127-136.
64.
Vincent, M., Di Cristo, A., & Hirst, D. (1995). Prosodic features of finality for intonation units in French discourse. Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 718-721). Stockholm.
65.
Wenk, B., & Wioland, F. (1982). Is French really syllable-timed? Journal of Phonetics, 10, 193-216.
66.
Wightman, C., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., Ostendorf, M., & Price, P. (1992). Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 92, 1707-1717.
67.
Wunderli, P. (1984). L'intonation des questions sans marque segmentale [The intonation of syntactically unmarked questions]. Travaux de linguistique et de littérature [Working Papers in Linguistics and Literature] , 22, 203-250.
68.
Yaeger-Dror, M. (1992). Lexical classes in Montreal French: The case of (E:). Language and Speech, 35, 251-293.
