The Effect of Cue-Enhancement on Consonant Intelligibility in Noise: Speaker and Listener Effects

Abstract

Our previous work (Hazan & Simpson, 1998) has shown that increasing the salience of perceptually important regions of nonsense word and sentence materials aids speech perception in noise. This study aimed to extend these findings by investigating the robustness of these enhancement techniques in improving consonant intelligibility for a range of different speakers and for groups of listeners with different language backgrounds. In Experiment 1, nonsense vowel-consonant-vowel (VCV) tokens produced by two female and two male speakers without phonetic training were annotated to highlight segments of the signal corresponding to the consonant constriction/occlusion and vowel onset/offset regions. These regions were selectively amplified to enhance the cues they contained, then combined with speech- shaped noise at 0 dB SNR and presented to normally hearing listeners. Significant improvements in intelligibility were found for all speakers although the extent of the improvement varied across speakers. In Experiment 2, a subset of these stimuli were presented to two groups of learners of English — a Japanese- L1 groupanda Spanish - L1 group —and a new group of native-English controls. Results showed a significant effect of enhancement in all listener-groups and similar speaker effects for the non-native and native English listeners. Error patterns were related to the distance between the phonological systems of listeners' L1 and L2.

Keywords

enhancement second-language learning speaker variability speech perception

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Best, C.T. (1996). A direct-realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 229-273). Timonium, MD: York Press.

Bond, Z.S. , & Moore, T.J. (1994). A note on the acoustic-phonetic characteristics of inadvertently clear speech. Speech Communication, 14, 325-227.

Bradlow, A.R. , Torretta, G.M. , & Pisoni, D.B. (1996). Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Communication, 20, 255-272.

Cox, R.M. , Alexander, G.C. , & Gilmore, C. (1987). Intelligibility of average talkers in typical listening environments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81, 1598-1608.

Dubno, J.R. , & Levitt, H. (1981). Predicting consonant confusions from acoustic analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 249-261.

Flege, J.E. (1996). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 229-273). Timonium, MD: York Press.

Flege, J.E. , & Wang, C. (1991). Native-language phonotactic constraints affect how well Chinese subjects perceive the word-final /t/-/d/ contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 299-315.

Fourcin, A.J. (1986).Electrolaryngographic assessment of vocal fold function. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 435-442.

Glasberg, B.R. , & Moore, B.C.J. (1990). Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notchednoise data. Journal of Experimental Hearing Research, 47, 103-138.

10.

Gordon-Salant, S. (1986). Recognition of natural and time/intensity altered CVs by young and elderly subjects with normal hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80, 1599-1607.

11.

Hazan, V. , & Simpson, A. (1998).The effect of cue-enhancement on the intelligibility of non sense word and sentence materials presented in noise. Speech Communication, 24, 211-226.

12.

Heinz, J.M. , & Stevens, K.N. (1961). On the properties of voiceless fricative consonants . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33, 589-596.

13.

Ingram, J.C.L. , & Park, S-G. (1998). Language, context, and speaker effects in the identification and discrimination of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese and Korean listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 1161-1174.

14.

Jamieson, D.G. , & Morosan, D.E. (1986). Training non-native contrasts in adults: Acquisition of the English /ð/-/θ/ contrast by francophones. Perception and Psychophysics , 40, 205-215.

15.

Lane, H.L. , & Tranel, B. (1971). The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech . Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 677-709.

16.

Mayo, L.H. , Florentine, M. , & Buus, S. (1997). Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 686-693.

17.

Miller, G.A. , & Nicely, P.E. (1955). Analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 338 - 353.

18.

Montgomery, A.A. , & Edge, R.A. (1988). Evaluation of two speech enhancement techniques to improve intelligibility for hearing impaired adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 31, 386-393.

19.

O'Connor, J.D. (1967).Better English pronunciation . Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press .

20.

Picheny, M.A. , Durlach, N.I. , & Braida, L.D. (1986). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 434-446.

21.

Pickett, J.M. (1980). The sounds of speech communication. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

22.

Pruitt, J.S. , Kawahara, H. , Akahane-Yamada, R. , Kubo, R. (1998). Methods of enhancing speech stimuli for perceptual training: Exaggerated articulation, context truncation, and "STRAIGHT"resynthesis . In R.Carlson , C. Dunger , B. Granstrom , & A. Oster (Eds.), Proceedings of ESCA STiLL workshop (pp.105-108). Marholmen: May, 1998 .

23.

Stevens, K.N. (1985). Evidence for the role of acoustic boundaries in the perception of speech sounds. In V. Fromkin (Ed.), Phonetic linguistics: Essays in the honor of Peter Ladefoged. Orlando: Academic Press .

24.

Stevens, K.N. (1998). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

25.

Takata, Y. , & Nabelek, A.K. (1990). English consonant recognition in noise and in reverberation by Japanese and American listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 663-666.

26.

Wang, D.M. , & Bilger, R.C. (1973). Consonant confusionsin noise: A study of perceptual features. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 1248-1266.