The issue of the perception of lexical tone has been addressed mainly through studies of Southeast Asian languages which feature phonological contour tones as well as level tones. Little attention has been paid to African languages which have, almost exclusively, only level tones. This paper examines tone perception in Mambila, a Benue- Congo language with four levellexicaltones. A categorization experiment was run to determine some of the salient aspects of the perceptual nature of these tones. Since the four tones are well defined with respect to production, we sought to determine whether this characteristic carried over into perception, the expectation being that experimental stimuli, on the basis of pitch height alone, would fall into four reasonably well defined categories. Results showed interesting differences across the four tones, with indications that the two Mid tones, T2 and T3, are perceptually different than the High (T1) and Low(T4) tones.The experiment was run a second time,using a group of native English listeners, to assess to what extent results for the Mambila listeners were determined by the perceptual structure of the Mambila tone system. A Signal Detection analysis was used, which revealed important differences between the two groups of listeners. Results are discussed in light of what is known about universal tendencies of tone systems and the historical development of the Mambila system.
Abramson, A.S.( 1961). Identification and discrimination of phonemic tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33, 842 (abstract).
2.
Abramson, A.S. (1972). Tonal experiments with whispered Thai. In A. Valdman (Ed.), Papers in linguistics and phonetics to the memory of Pierre Delattre (pp.31-44). The Hague: Mouton.
3.
Abramson, A.S.( 1975).The tones of Central Thai: Some perceptual experiments . In J. G. Harris & J. Chamberlain, Studies in Thai linguistics (pp.1-16). Bangkok: Central Institute of English Language .
4.
Abramson, A.S. (1976). Static and dynamic acousticcuesin distinctivetones. Haskins Laboratories status report on speech research. SR-47, pp.121-127.
5.
Abramson, A.S. (1977). The noncategorical perception of tone categories in Thai. Presented to the 93rd meeting of theAcoustical Society of America, State College, Penn.
6.
Anderson, S.R.( 1978). Tone features. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Tone: A linguistic survey (pp.133- 175). New York: Academic Press.
7.
Blicher, D.L., Diehl, R.L., & Cohen, L.B.( 1990). Effects of syllableduration on the perception of the Mandarin Tone 2/Tone 3 distinction: Evidence of auditory enhancement . Journal of Phonetics, 18, 37-49.
8.
Braida, L.D., & Durlach, N.L. (1972). Intensity perception II: Resolution in one-interval paradigms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51(2.2), 483 - 502.
9.
Chan, S.W., Chuang, C.K., & Wang, S.-Y. (1975).Cross language study of categorical perception for lexical tone. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 58, 119 (abstract).
10.
Connell, B. (1998). A brief history of tone: Tonal development in Mambila.Paper presented to the 29th Annual Conference on African Linguistics,Yale University, March, 1998.
11.
Connell, B. (1999a). Four tones and downtrend: A preliminary report on pitchrealization in Mambila. In P. Kotey (Ed.), New dimensions in African linguistics and languages: Trends in African linguistics, Vol.3 (pp. 75-88).Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
12.
Connell, B. (1999b). Mid tone downtrends in Mambila. Paper presented to the 7th Manchester Phonology Meeting, May, 1999.
13.
Connell, B., Hogan, J.T., & Roszypal, A.J. (1983). Experimental evidence for interaction between tone and intonation in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Phonetics, 11(4), 337-351.
14.
Connell, B., & Ladd, D.R. (1990).Aspects of pitch realisation in Yoruba. Phonology, 7, 1-29
15.
Flanagan, J., & Saslow, M. (1958). Pitch discrimination of synthetic vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 1319-1328.
16.
Fox, R.A., & Unkefer, J. (1985). The effect of lexical status on the perception of tone. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 13, 69-90.
17.
Gandour, J.T. (1978). The perception of tone. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Tone: A linguistic survey (pp.41-76). New York: Academic Press.
18.
Gandour, J.T. (1981). Perceptual dimensions of tone: Evidence from Cantonese . Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 9, 20-36.
19.
Gandour, J.T. (1983). Tone perceptionin Far Eastern languages. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 149-175.
20.
Gårding, E., Kratochvil, J., Svantesson, O., & Zhang, J. (1986). Tone 4 and Tone 3 discrimination in Modern Standard Chinese. Language and Speech, 29, 281-293.
21.
Gottfried, T.L., & Suiter, T.L. (1997). Effect of linguistic experience on the identification of Mandarin Chinese vowels and tones. Journal of Phonetics25, 207-231.
22.
Green, D.M., & Swets, J.A.( 1974).S ignal detection theory and psychophysics. Huntington NY: Krieger.
23.
Hombert, J.-M. (1976). Perception of tones of bisyllabicnouns in Yoruba. Studies in African Linguistics Supplement, pp. 109 - 121.
24.
Hombert, J.-M. (1988). Tonper,un test de perception pour langues tonales: Application au bulu. Pholia, 3, 169-182.
25.
Jaeger, J., & Wan, I.-P. ( 1998).Speech errors and there presentation of tone in Mandarin Chinese. Phonology , 15(3), 417-461.
26.
Laniran, Y.( 1992). Intonation in atone language: The phonetic implementation of tone in Yoruba. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell.
27.
Lavelle, C.R. (1974).An experimental study of Yorubatone. Studies in African Linguistics Suppl. 5, pp. 185 - 194.
28.
Liberman, M., Schultz, J.M., Hong, S., & Okeke, V. (1993). The phonetic interpretation of tone in Igbo. Phonetica, 50, 147-160.
29.
MacMillan, N.A. (1987). Beyond the categorical/continuous distinction: A psychophysical approach to processing modes. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception: The ground work of cognition (pp. 53-85). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
30.
MacMillan, N.A., & Creelman, C.D. (1989). Detection theory: A user' sguide .Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Maddieson, I. (1978). The frequency of tones. UCLA working papers in phonetics, 41, 43-52.
32.
Massaro, D.W.,Cohen, M.M., & Tseng, C. (1985).The evaluation and integration of pitch height and pitch contour in lexical tone perception in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 13, 267-290.
33.
Moore, B.C.J.( 1997). Aspects of auditory processing related to speech perception . In W.J. Hardcastle & J. Laver (Eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences (pp.539-565). Oxford: Blackwell .
34.
Mouh, M., & Perrin, M. (1995). Lexique mambila-français. Yaoundé: SIL.
35.
Myers, S. (1996). Boundary tones and the phonetic implementation of tone in Chichewa. Studies in African Linguistics, 25(1), 29-60.
36.
Omozuwa, V.E.( 1991).Acousticcues for the perception of tones of disyllabic nouns in Edo. Studies in African Linguistics, 22(2), 135-156.
37.
Peng, S.-H. (1997). Production and perception of Taiwanese tones in different tonal and prosodic contexts. Journal of Phonetics ,25,371-400.
38.
Perrin, M. (1974). Mambila. In J. Bendor-Samuel(Ed.), Ten Nigerian tone systems (pp.93-108). Jos : Institute of Linguistics.
39.
Perrin, M.(n.d.). The tone system in Mambila: Some further comments. Unpublished ms. Yaoundé: SIL.
40.
Rose, P.( 1988). On the nonequivalence of fundamental frequency and pitch in tonal description. In D. Bradley , E.J.A. Henderson, & M. Mazaudon(Eds.), Prosodic analysis and Asian linguistics: To honor R. K. Sprigg (pp.55-82). Pacific Linguistics , C.-104.
41.
Schönemann, P.H., & Tucker, L.R.( 1967). A maximum likelihood solution for the method of successive intervals allowing for unequal stimulus dispersions. Psychometrika , 32,403-417.
