A framework for assessing practical competence in laboratory animal science (LAS): development of direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) by the ETPLAS Working Group

Abstract

German

Spanish

French

Assessment of practical skills is a key component in ensuring competence in laboratory animal science (LAS), particularly for practitioners performing functions A, C and D as defined in the Directive 2010/63/EU, namely those who carry out procedures on animals, care for them and perform humane killing, respectively. To address the need for a harmonised, objective and transparent approach to assessing practical competence, Working Group 4 (WG4) of the Education and Training Platform for Laboratory Animal Science (ETPLAS) has developed a set of Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) tools. These tools are tailored specifically to evaluate the intended learning outcomes of Modules 3.2, 6.2, 8 and 20–22 of the European Union (EU) Education and Training Framework. This report outlines the rationale, structure and guidance for implementing the DOPS tools. Based on Miller’s pyramid and established educational principles, DOPS tools are suitable for formative and summative assessments in simulated or real environments. They can be used both formatively to monitor progress during training and summatively to support end-of-training decisions about competence. Their implementation is crucial to supporting harmonised training, facilitating mutual recognition of competence and ultimately advancing both animal welfare and the quality of scientific research in the EU and beyond. The DOPS forms are available as supplemental material to this article and from the ETPLAS website.

Keywords

DOPS laboratory animal science practical skills competence assessment EU training modules

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2010.

European Commission. National competent authorities for the implementation of Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes: working document on the development of a common education and training framework to fulfil the requirements under the Directive. Brussels: European Commission, 2014.

Hansen

Sørensen

DB.

Strategies for the assessment of competence in laboratory animal science courses. Lab Anim (NY) 2014; 43(10): 359–363.

Gyger

Berdoy

Dontas

, et al. FELASA accreditation of education and training courses in laboratory animal science according to Directive 2010/63/EU. Lab Anim 2018; 53(2): 137–147.

Costa

Lamas

Correia

, et al. An Objective Structured Laboratory Animal Science Examination (OSLASE) to ensure researchers’ professional competence in laboratory animal science. Lab Anim 2023; 57(2): 149–159.

Frías

Let’s do it right: eight steps to competence in laboratory animal science in the European Union. Lab Anim 2023; 57(2): 112–116.

Frías

Flecknell

PA.

Education, training, and competence in laboratory animal science. In: J

Guillén

Galligioni

(eds) Practical management of research animal care and use programs. Laboratory animal science and medicine. Vol 3. Cham: Springer, 2024, pp.1–20.

Galichet

Ghirardello

O’Mahony

, et al. Building training and competence through collaboration: a case study of a centralised training framework in animal research. Anim Technol Welfare 2025; 24(2): 97–103.

Laboratory Animal Science Association (LASA). Guiding principles for supervision and assessment of competence under EU and UK legislation. London: LASA, 2016.

10.

Miller

GE.

The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 1990; 65(9): 63–67.

11.

Dreyfus

SE.

The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bull Sci Technol Soc 2004; 24: 177–181.

12.

Eraut

Concepts of competence. J Interprof Care 1998; 12(2): 127–139.

13.

Franco

Kerton

Lewis

DI.

Education in laboratory animal science and the 3Rs. Lab Anim 2023; 57(2): 109–111.

14.

Chlebus

Guillen

Prins

JB.

Directive 2010/63/EU: facilitating full and correct implementation. Lab Anim 2016; 50(2): 151.

15.

Biggs

Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. High Educ 1996; 32: 347–364.

16.

Norcini

Burch

Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach 2007; 29(9–10): 855–871.

17.

Magnier

Dale

Pead

MJ.

Workplace-based assessment instruments in the health sciences. J Vet Med Educ 2012; 39(4): 389–395.

18.

Farajpour

Amini

Pishbin

, et al. Using modified direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) to assess undergraduate medical students. J Adv Med Educ Prof 2018; 6(3): 130–136.

19.

Weijs

Coe

Hecker

KG.

Final-year students’ and clinical instructors’ experience of workplace-based assessments used in a small-animal primary-veterinary-care clinical rotation. J Vet Med Educ 2015; 42(4): 382–392.

20.

Bell

Hammond

Directly observed procedural skills: what do the assessors think?

Med Teach 2018; 40(6): 599–604.

21.

Ten Cate

Chen

Hoff

, et al. Curriculum development for the workplace using entrustable professional activities (EPAs): AMEE Guide No. 99. Med Teach 2015; 37: 983–1002.

22.

Tiebosch

Whitfield

Favier

Introducing entrustable professional activities and competency-based development into workplace-based training within laboratory animal sciences. Lab Anim 2025; 59(6): 645–651.

23.

Christensen

Kang

, et al. Development of an international glossary for clinical guidelines collaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2023; 158: 84–91. Erratum in: J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 175: 111514. PMID: 37019344.

24.

Costa

Lamas

Costa

, et al. The assessment of researchers’ competence in experimental procedures with laboratory animals: a three-step methodology to develop a global rating scale. Lab Anim 2021; 55(5): 463–471.

25.

Wragg

Wade

Fuller

, et al. Assessing the performance of specialist registrars. Clin Med 2003; 3(2): 131–134.

26.

Naeem

Validity, reliability, feasibility, acceptability and educational impact of direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS). J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2013; 23(1): 77–82.

27.

Erfani Khanghahi

Ebadi Fard Azar

. Direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) evaluation method: systematic review of evidence. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2018; 32: 45.

28.

Taras

Summative and formative assessment. Active Learn High Educ 2008; 9: 172–192.

29.

Valero

Cárdenas

Formative and summative assessment in veterinary pathology and other courses at a Mexican veterinary college. J Vet Med Educ 2017; 44(2): 331–337.

30.

van der Vleuten

Schuwirth

Driessen

, et al. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Med Teach 2012; 34(3): 205–214.

31.

Mohr

Magagula

Lewis

DI.

Learning outcomes for the education and training of laboratory animal caretakers in South Africa. J S Afr Vet Assoc 2023; 94: 520.

32.

Ten Cate

Taylor

. The recommended description of an entrustable professional activity: AMEE Guide No. 140. Med Teach 2021; 43(10): 1106–1114.

33.

Epstein

RM.

Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 387–396.

34.

Keszei

Novak

Streiner

DL.

Introduction to health measurement scales. J Psychosom Res 2010; 68(4): 319–323.

35.

Souza

Alexandre

NMC

Guirardello

EB.

Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiol Serv Saude 2017; 26(3): 649–659.

36.

Wilkinson

Crossley

JGM

Wragg

, et al. Implementing workplace-based assessment across the medical specialties in the United Kingdom. Med Educ 2008; 42: 364–373.

37.

Siau

Crossley

Dunckley

, et al. Direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) assessment in diagnostic gastroscopy: nationwide evidence of validity and competency development during training. Surg Endosc 2020; 34: 105–114.

38.

Abelson

Chambers

De La Cueva

, et al. Harmonisation of education, training and continuing professional development for laboratory animal caretakers, technicians and technologists: report of the FELASA–EFAT working group. Lab Anim 2023; 57(6): 599–610.

39.

European Commission. ALURES: statistics on the use of animals for scientific purposes in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission, 2022.

40.

Cobb

Brown

Jaarsma

, et al. The educational impact of assessment: a comparison of DOPS and MCQs. Med Teach 2013; 35(11): e1598–e1607.

41.

Smith

Aiding mutual recognition of laboratory animal science courses through the ETPLAS initiative, the Education & Training Platform for Laboratory Animal Science. Lab Anim 2016; 50: 223–224.

42.

Education and Training Platform for Laboratory Animal Science (ETPLAS). https://www.etplas.eu. Accessed November 2025.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.06 MB

0.02 MB

0.00 MB