Abdal-Haqq, I. (1996). Making time for teacher professional development . Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 400 259)
2.
Airasian, P., Gullickson, A., Hahn, L., & Farland, D. (1995). Teacher self-evaluation: The literature in perspective (Grant No. R117Q00047). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement .
3.
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1995). Expanding a teacher's knowledge base: A cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. In T. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practice (pp. 35-61). New York: Teachers College Press.
4.
Elbaz, F. (1988). Critical reflection on teaching: Insights from Freire. Journal of Education for Teaching, 14(2), 171-180.
5.
Fitzsimmons, S.J., & Kerpelman, L.C. (1994). Teacher enhancement for elementary and secondary science and mathematics: Status, issues, and problems (Contract No. BAC 9002179 & 91151765). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
6.
Frechtling, J., Sharp, L., Carey, N., & Vaden-Kiernan, N. (1995). Teacher enhancement programs: A perspective on the last four decades (Contract No. SED 92-55369). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation .
7.
Gore, J.M. (1987). Reflecting on reflective teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), 33-39.
8.
Joyce, B.R., Murphy, C., Showers, B., & Murphy, J. (1989). School renewal as cultural change. Educational Leadership, 47(3), 70-77.
9.
Joyce, B.R., & Showers, B. (1982). The coaching of teaching. Educational Leadership, 40(1), 4-10.
10.
Kremer-Hayon, L. (1993). Teacher self-evaluation: Teachers in their own mirrors. Boston: Kluwer Academic .
11.
McCutcheon, G., & Jung, B. (1990). Alternative perspectives on action research. Theory into Practice, 29(3), 144-151.
12.
Miller, P.M., Hersen, M., & Eisler, R.M. (1974). Relative effectiveness of instructions, agreements, and reinforcement in behavioral contracts with alcoholics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 548-553.
13.
Shavelson, R.J., Copelan, W.D., Baxter, G.P., Decker, D.L., & Ruiz-Primo, M.A. (1994). Inservice education models for enhancing the teaching of science. In S. J. Fitzsimmons & L. C. Kerpelman (Eds.), Teacher enhancement for elementary science and mathematics: Status issues, and problems (pp. 5-26). Washington, DC : Division of Research, Evaluation and Dissemination, National Science Foundation.
14.
Spiegel, A., & Dethlefs, T. (1995). Continuing the movement for change: 1995 PEERS academy workshops. Lincoln: Nebraska Math and Science Initiative.
15.
Wise, V.L., & Spiegel, A.N. (1996). Evaluation of participant experience in NMSI PEERS . Lincoln: Nebraska Math and Science Initiative.