The major reform reports of the past decade have several com mon recommendations that require the attention of teacher educators. Those recommendations have been the subject of considerable debate. But they have not necessarily resulted in a specific set of implementation activities. The authors con ducted a survey of AACTE institutions to determine whether curriculum and program structure changes were occurring.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy. ( 1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century . New York: Carnegie Corporation.
2.
Education Commission of the States Teacher Education Project. (1986). Chart 1 (No. TE-86-C 1). Denver, CO: Author.
3.
Hall, G.E. (1986). Beyond the looking glass: Recommendations and critical warnings for teacher education practitioners, policymakers and researchers . Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, The Research and Development Center for Teacher Education .
4.
Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's Teachers: A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing, MI: Author.
5.
National Commission on Excellence in Teacher Education. (1985, March 6). A call for change in teacher education . The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. 13-22.
6.
Southern Regional Education Board. (1985). Improving teacher education: An agenda for higher education and the schools . Atlanta: Author .
7.
Stone, J.C. (1968). Breakthrough in teacher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8.
Tyler, R.W. (1971). In-service education of teachers: A look at the past and future. In L. L. Rubin (Ed.), Improving In-Service Education: Proposals and Procedures for Change (pp. 5-17). Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
