American Council on Education, Commission on Teacher Education.Bennington Planning Conference for the Cooperative Study of Teacher Education. Washington, D.C.: the Council, 1939.
2.
—. The Improvement of Teacher Education. Washington, D.C.: the Council, 1946.
3.
American Council on Education, Staff of the Division of Child Development and Teacher Personnel.Helping Teachers Understand Children. Washington, D.C.: the Council, 1945.
4.
American Institute for Research.Critical Requirements for Research Personnel. Pittsburgh, Pa.: the Institute, March 1949.
5.
—. Technical Appendices for Procedures for Evaluating Research Personnel Using a Performance Record of Critical Incidents. Pittsburgh, Pa.: the Institute, June 1950.
6.
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, National Education Association.Better Than Rating: New Approaches to Appraisal of Teaching Services. Washington, D. C.: the Association, 1950.
7.
—. Instructional Leadership in Small Schools. Washington, D.C.: the Association, 1951.
8.
Ayer, FredC. Fundamentals of InstructionalSupervision. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1954.
9.
Bail, P.M. "Do Teachers Receive the Kind of Supervision They Desire?" Journal of Educational Research40: 713-16; May 1947 .
10.
Farris, Ragene A. "A Critical Study of Curriculum Development of Coordination in Secondary Schools of Southern California." Unpublished doctor's thesis. University of California, Los Angeles, 1954.
11.
Fielstra, Clarence. "Supervision Today." The Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals34: 9-20; December 1950.
12.
Franseth, Jane.Learning To Supervise Schools: An Appraisal of the Georgia Program. U.S. Office of Education, Federal Security Agency, Circular No. 289. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1952.
13.
Hanson, Louise Trigg. "Needs of Teachers as a Basis for a Supervisory Program in Tom Green County, Texas." Unpublished master's thesis. The University of Texas, 1953.
14.
Higgins, Sister M. Xavier.Reducing the Variability of Supervisor's Judgments: An Experimental Study. Johns Hopkins University Studies in Education No. 23. Baltimore, Md.: the Johns Hopkins Press, 1936.
15.
Hill, George E. "Teachers' Instructional Difficulties—A Review of Research." Journal of Educational Research37: 602-15; April 1944.
16.
Hughes, James Monroe.The Attitudes and Preferences of Teachers and Administrators for School Supervision . Contributions to Education, School of Education Series No. 12. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University, 1939.
17.
Jensen, Alfred C. "Determining Critical Requirements for Teachers ." The Journal of Experimental Education20: 79-85; September 1951.
18.
Murray, Thomas , and Bradley, H.M. "Teachers Don't Fear Supervision When They Help To Define It." Nation's Schools46: 37-38; August 1950.
19.
Nossen, Robert. "Criticism, Encouragement, Growth." The Journal of Teacher Education5: 205-08; September 1954.
20.
Replogle, Vernon L. "What Help Do Teachers Want?" Educational Leadership7: 445-49: April 1950 .