Allen, M. (2003). Eight questions on teacher preparation: What does the research say? Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
2.
Cochran-Smith, M. (2001). Reforming teacher education: Competing agendas. Journal of Teacher Education, 52, 263-265.
3.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Sclan, E. (1996). Who teaches and why. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 67-101). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1998). Teaching in dangerous times: Culturally relevant approaches to teacher assessment. Journal of Negro Education, 67(3), 255-267.
6.
Mosteller, F., & Boruch, R. (2001). Evidence matters, randomized trials in education research. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
7.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (P.L. 107-110).
8.
Oakes, J., Franke, M., Quartz, K., & Rogers, J. (2002). Research for high-quality urban teaching: Defining it, developing it, assessing it. Journal of Teacher Education,53(3), 228-234.
9.
Paige, R. (2002). Secretary Paige releases state reports on teacher preparation. Retrieved May, 2002, from www.title2.org
10.
Rice, J. K. (2003). Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
11.
Sanders, W. (1998). Value-added assessment. The School Administrator, pp. 24-27.
12.
Sanders, W., & Horn, S. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(3), 247-256.
13.
Thiessen, D. (2000). Developing a knowledge for preparing teachers: Redefining the role of schools of education. Educational Policy, 14, 129-144.
14.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge, The Secretary’s annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education.
15.
U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge, The Secretary’s second annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education.
16.
Weiss, C. (2001). What to do until the random assigner comes. In F. Mosteller & R. Boruch (Eds.), Evidence matters, randomized trials in education research (pp. 198-224). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
17.
Whitehurst, G. (2001). Evidence-based education (EBE). Retrieved September 12, 2003, from www.ed.gov
18.
Whitehurst, G. (2002). Scientifically based research on teacher quality: Research on teacher preparation and professional development. Paper presented at the White House Conference on Preparing Tomorrow’s Teachers, Washington, DC.
19.
Wilson, S., Floden, R., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
20.
Zeichner, K., & Schulte, A. (2001). What we know and don’t know from peer-reviewed research about alternative teacher certification programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(4), 266-282.
