Students with emotional or behavioral disorders (EBD) present significant academic and behavior management challenges for educators. As such, educators are constantly seeking interventions that are effective in assisting students with EBD to manage their own behavior and achieve success in school. One behavioral management approach that educators frequently recommend is the level system. As a first step to better understand level systems, we conducted a large-scale survey to determine the extent of level system use, the characteristics of teacher and students who use level systems, level system characteristics and procedures, teacher perceptions of level system effectiveness, and teacher satisfaction with level systems. Analysis of data revealed extensive use of level systems, similarities and differences between level system users and nonusers, characteristics common to level systems, and inconsistencies in perceptions of effectiveness and satisfaction. Finally, we offer implications of our findings for educators and provide suggestions for further level system research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Algozzine, R. (1990). Problem behavior management: Educator's resource service.Rockville, MD: Aspen.
2.
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis.New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Bauer, A. M., Shea, T. M., & Keppler, R. (1986). Level systems: A framework for the individualization of behavior management. Behavioral Disorders, 12, 28–35.
4.
Beuchert-Klotz, M. E. B. (1987). Development of a behavior management level system: A comprehensive school-wide behavior management program for emotionally disturbed adolescents. The Pointer, 31(2), 5–11.
5.
Braaten, S., Kauffman, J. M., Braaten, B., Polsgrove, L., & Nelson, M. (1988). The Regular Education Initiative: Patent medicine for behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 55, 21–27.
6.
Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders. (1989). Position statement on the Regular Education Initiative. Behavioral Disorders, 14, 201–207.
7.
Council for Exceptional Children. (1993). CEC policy on inclusive schools and community settings.Reston, VA: Author.
8.
Crocker, L. M., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
9.
Downing, J. A., Simpson, R. L., & Myles, B. S. (1990). Regular and special educator perceptions of nonacademic skills needed by mainstreamed students with behavioral disorders and learning disabilities. Behavioral Disorders, 15, 217–226.
10.
Dwyer, K. P. (1990). Making the least restrictive environment work for children with serious emotional disturbance: Just say no to segregated placements. Preventing School Failure, 34, 14–21.
11.
Gable, R. A., Laycock, V. K., Maroney, S. A., & Smith, C. R. (1991). Preparing to integrate students with behavior disorders. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 333 658)
12.
Gresham, F. M., Elliot, S. N., & Black, F. L. (1987). Teacher-rated social skills of mainstreamed mildly handicapped and nonhandicapped children. School Psychology Review, 16, 77–88.
13.
Hewett, F. M. (1968). The emotionally disturbed child in the classroom: A developmental strategy for educating children with maladaptive behavior.Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq…
14.
Kauffman, J. M. (1993). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth.New York: Merrill.
15.
Kerr, M., & Nelson, C. M. (1989). Strategies for managing behavior problems in the classroom (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
16.
Kirigin, K. A., Braukmann, C. J., Atwater, J. D., & Wolf, M. M. (1982). An evaluation of teaching-family (Achievement Place) group homes for juvenile offenders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 1–16.
17.
Knitzer, J. (1982). Unclaimed children: The failure of public responsibility to children and adolescents in need of mental health services.Washington, DC: Children's Defense Fund.
18.
Landrum, T. J. (1992). Teachers as victims: An interactional analysis of the teacher's role in educating atypical learners. Behavioral Disorders, 17, 135–144.
19.
National Center for Education Statistics. (1993–1994). School and staffing survey: Public school questionnaire 1993–1994.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
20.
Nelson, C. M., & Pearson, C. A. (1991). Integrating services for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders.Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
21.
Peterson, R. L., Smith, C. R., White, M. A., & Zabel, R. (1980). Practices used in the reintegration of behavior disoidered children in three midwestern states. Paper presented at the National Topical Conference on Seriously Emotionally Disturbed, Council for Exceptional Children, Minneapolis. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 201–122)
22.
Pullis, M. (1992). An analysis of the occupational stress of teachers of the behaviorally disordered: Sources, effects, and strategies for coping. Behavioral Disorders, 17, 191–201.
23.
Scheuermann, B., Webber, J., Partin, M., & Knies, W. C. (1994). Level systems and the law: Are they compatible?Behavioral Disorders, 19, 205–220.
24.
Smith S. W., & Farrell, D. T. (1993). Level system use in special education: Classroom intervention with prima facie appeal. Behavioral Disorders, 18, 251–264.
25.
Stevens, J. (1990). Intermediate statistics: A modern approach.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
Taylor, F. D., Hewett, F. D., Artuso, A. A., Quay, H. C., Soloway, M. M., & Stillwell, R. J. (1972). A learning center plan for special education. Focus on Exceptional Children, 4(3), 1–7.
27.
U.S. Department of Education. (1996). Eighteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.Washington, DC: Author.
28.
Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (1990). Educational measurement and testing.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
